Cargando…

The pleasure of multiple images

How many pleasures can you track? In a previous study, we showed that people can simultaneously track the pleasure they experience from two images. Here, we push further, probing the individual and combined pleasures felt from seeing four images in one glimpse. Participants (N = 25) viewed 36 images...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brielmann, Aenne A., Pelli, Denis G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8049891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33205370
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02175-z
_version_ 1783679504428826624
author Brielmann, Aenne A.
Pelli, Denis G.
author_facet Brielmann, Aenne A.
Pelli, Denis G.
author_sort Brielmann, Aenne A.
collection PubMed
description How many pleasures can you track? In a previous study, we showed that people can simultaneously track the pleasure they experience from two images. Here, we push further, probing the individual and combined pleasures felt from seeing four images in one glimpse. Participants (N = 25) viewed 36 images spanning the entire range of pleasure. Each trial presented an array of four images, one in each quadrant of the screen, for 200 ms. On 80% of the trials, a central line cue pointed, randomly, at some screen corner either before (precue) or after (postcue) the images were shown. The cue indicated which image (the target) to rate while ignoring the others (distractors). On the other 20% of trials, an X cue requested a rating of the combined pleasure of all four images. Later, for baseline reference, we obtained a single-pleasure rating for each image shown alone. When precued, participants faithfully reported the pleasure of the target. When postcued, however, the mean ratings of images that are intensely pleasurable when seen alone (pleasure >4.5 on a 1–9 scale) dropped below baseline. Regardless of cue timing, the rating of the combined pleasure of four images was a linear transform of the average baseline pleasures of all four images. Thus, while people can faithfully track two pleasures, they cannot track four. Instead, the pleasure of otherwise above-medium-pleasure images is diminished, mimicking the effect of a distracting task. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13414-020-02175-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8049891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80498912021-04-29 The pleasure of multiple images Brielmann, Aenne A. Pelli, Denis G. Atten Percept Psychophys Article How many pleasures can you track? In a previous study, we showed that people can simultaneously track the pleasure they experience from two images. Here, we push further, probing the individual and combined pleasures felt from seeing four images in one glimpse. Participants (N = 25) viewed 36 images spanning the entire range of pleasure. Each trial presented an array of four images, one in each quadrant of the screen, for 200 ms. On 80% of the trials, a central line cue pointed, randomly, at some screen corner either before (precue) or after (postcue) the images were shown. The cue indicated which image (the target) to rate while ignoring the others (distractors). On the other 20% of trials, an X cue requested a rating of the combined pleasure of all four images. Later, for baseline reference, we obtained a single-pleasure rating for each image shown alone. When precued, participants faithfully reported the pleasure of the target. When postcued, however, the mean ratings of images that are intensely pleasurable when seen alone (pleasure >4.5 on a 1–9 scale) dropped below baseline. Regardless of cue timing, the rating of the combined pleasure of four images was a linear transform of the average baseline pleasures of all four images. Thus, while people can faithfully track two pleasures, they cannot track four. Instead, the pleasure of otherwise above-medium-pleasure images is diminished, mimicking the effect of a distracting task. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13414-020-02175-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-11-17 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8049891/ /pubmed/33205370 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02175-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Brielmann, Aenne A.
Pelli, Denis G.
The pleasure of multiple images
title The pleasure of multiple images
title_full The pleasure of multiple images
title_fullStr The pleasure of multiple images
title_full_unstemmed The pleasure of multiple images
title_short The pleasure of multiple images
title_sort pleasure of multiple images
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8049891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33205370
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02175-z
work_keys_str_mv AT brielmannaennea thepleasureofmultipleimages
AT pellidenisg thepleasureofmultipleimages
AT brielmannaennea pleasureofmultipleimages
AT pellidenisg pleasureofmultipleimages