Cargando…

Do group ensemble statistics bias visual working memory for individual items? A registered replication of Brady and Alvarez (2011)

We performed a registered and precise replication of Experiment 1 reported in Brady and Alvarez (Psychological Science, 22, 384–392, 2011). The original experiment found that participants, who were asked to memorize the size of differently colored circles, reported the size of a probed circle biased...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papenmeier, Frank, Timm, J. David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8049913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33269441
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02209-6
_version_ 1783679508864303104
author Papenmeier, Frank
Timm, J. David
author_facet Papenmeier, Frank
Timm, J. David
author_sort Papenmeier, Frank
collection PubMed
description We performed a registered and precise replication of Experiment 1 reported in Brady and Alvarez (Psychological Science, 22, 384–392, 2011). The original experiment found that participants, who were asked to memorize the size of differently colored circles, reported the size of a probed circle biased toward the mean size of the same-colored group. Because our previous three unpublished replication attempts failed to find this effect, we powered the present registered replication using a Bayes Factor Design Analysis such that it provided compelling evidence regarding the presence or absence of the reported bias with a high probability, even under the assumption of smaller effect sizes. Thus, we recruited 663 participants through Amazon Mechanical Turk. We observed both a significant bias and strong Bayesian evidence in favor of the existence of a bias over the null hypothesis. Thus, our results can be considered a successful replication of the original findings, although with a considerably smaller effect size. We discuss the role of data quality when recruiting participants with Amazon Mechanical Turk. The present findings corroborate the idea that memory representations of individual objects are influenced by summary statistics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8049913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80499132021-04-29 Do group ensemble statistics bias visual working memory for individual items? A registered replication of Brady and Alvarez (2011) Papenmeier, Frank Timm, J. David Atten Percept Psychophys Article We performed a registered and precise replication of Experiment 1 reported in Brady and Alvarez (Psychological Science, 22, 384–392, 2011). The original experiment found that participants, who were asked to memorize the size of differently colored circles, reported the size of a probed circle biased toward the mean size of the same-colored group. Because our previous three unpublished replication attempts failed to find this effect, we powered the present registered replication using a Bayes Factor Design Analysis such that it provided compelling evidence regarding the presence or absence of the reported bias with a high probability, even under the assumption of smaller effect sizes. Thus, we recruited 663 participants through Amazon Mechanical Turk. We observed both a significant bias and strong Bayesian evidence in favor of the existence of a bias over the null hypothesis. Thus, our results can be considered a successful replication of the original findings, although with a considerably smaller effect size. We discuss the role of data quality when recruiting participants with Amazon Mechanical Turk. The present findings corroborate the idea that memory representations of individual objects are influenced by summary statistics. Springer US 2020-12-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8049913/ /pubmed/33269441 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02209-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Papenmeier, Frank
Timm, J. David
Do group ensemble statistics bias visual working memory for individual items? A registered replication of Brady and Alvarez (2011)
title Do group ensemble statistics bias visual working memory for individual items? A registered replication of Brady and Alvarez (2011)
title_full Do group ensemble statistics bias visual working memory for individual items? A registered replication of Brady and Alvarez (2011)
title_fullStr Do group ensemble statistics bias visual working memory for individual items? A registered replication of Brady and Alvarez (2011)
title_full_unstemmed Do group ensemble statistics bias visual working memory for individual items? A registered replication of Brady and Alvarez (2011)
title_short Do group ensemble statistics bias visual working memory for individual items? A registered replication of Brady and Alvarez (2011)
title_sort do group ensemble statistics bias visual working memory for individual items? a registered replication of brady and alvarez (2011)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8049913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33269441
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02209-6
work_keys_str_mv AT papenmeierfrank dogroupensemblestatisticsbiasvisualworkingmemoryforindividualitemsaregisteredreplicationofbradyandalvarez2011
AT timmjdavid dogroupensemblestatisticsbiasvisualworkingmemoryforindividualitemsaregisteredreplicationofbradyandalvarez2011