Cargando…
New results with regard to the Flora bust controversy: radiocarbon dating suggests nineteenth century origin
Many works of art have been attributed to Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519), the great artist-scientist-engineer of the Italian Renaissance; however, art historians have struggled to find definitive proof to connect Leonardo to these art pieces. The Flora wax bust in the Bode Museum, Berlin, was attribu...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8050239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33859211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85505-x |
_version_ | 1783679558334021632 |
---|---|
author | Reiche, Ina Beck, Lucile Caffy, Ingrid |
author_facet | Reiche, Ina Beck, Lucile Caffy, Ingrid |
author_sort | Reiche, Ina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many works of art have been attributed to Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519), the great artist-scientist-engineer of the Italian Renaissance; however, art historians have struggled to find definitive proof to connect Leonardo to these art pieces. The Flora wax bust in the Bode Museum, Berlin, was attributed to Leonardo because her face resembles several Leonardo portraits, but this attribution has the subject of intense debate since the bust’s acquisition in 1909. Using new chemical analyses and absolute (14)C dating, we are able to resolve the question of authenticity. We show that the Flora wax bust is made primarily of spermaceti which was extracted from sperm whales. Therefore, (14)C dating must consider the Marine Reservoir Effect. We have generated a new calibration method and dated the bust to the 19th c. This proves that the bust was not produced during the Renaissance, and thus cannot be attributed to da Vinci, and illustrates that (14)C dating can be applied to unusual materials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8050239 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80502392021-04-16 New results with regard to the Flora bust controversy: radiocarbon dating suggests nineteenth century origin Reiche, Ina Beck, Lucile Caffy, Ingrid Sci Rep Article Many works of art have been attributed to Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519), the great artist-scientist-engineer of the Italian Renaissance; however, art historians have struggled to find definitive proof to connect Leonardo to these art pieces. The Flora wax bust in the Bode Museum, Berlin, was attributed to Leonardo because her face resembles several Leonardo portraits, but this attribution has the subject of intense debate since the bust’s acquisition in 1909. Using new chemical analyses and absolute (14)C dating, we are able to resolve the question of authenticity. We show that the Flora wax bust is made primarily of spermaceti which was extracted from sperm whales. Therefore, (14)C dating must consider the Marine Reservoir Effect. We have generated a new calibration method and dated the bust to the 19th c. This proves that the bust was not produced during the Renaissance, and thus cannot be attributed to da Vinci, and illustrates that (14)C dating can be applied to unusual materials. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8050239/ /pubmed/33859211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85505-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Reiche, Ina Beck, Lucile Caffy, Ingrid New results with regard to the Flora bust controversy: radiocarbon dating suggests nineteenth century origin |
title | New results with regard to the Flora bust controversy: radiocarbon dating suggests nineteenth century origin |
title_full | New results with regard to the Flora bust controversy: radiocarbon dating suggests nineteenth century origin |
title_fullStr | New results with regard to the Flora bust controversy: radiocarbon dating suggests nineteenth century origin |
title_full_unstemmed | New results with regard to the Flora bust controversy: radiocarbon dating suggests nineteenth century origin |
title_short | New results with regard to the Flora bust controversy: radiocarbon dating suggests nineteenth century origin |
title_sort | new results with regard to the flora bust controversy: radiocarbon dating suggests nineteenth century origin |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8050239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33859211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85505-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reicheina newresultswithregardtotheflorabustcontroversyradiocarbondatingsuggestsnineteenthcenturyorigin AT becklucile newresultswithregardtotheflorabustcontroversyradiocarbondatingsuggestsnineteenthcenturyorigin AT caffyingrid newresultswithregardtotheflorabustcontroversyradiocarbondatingsuggestsnineteenthcenturyorigin |