Cargando…

A maturity grid assessment tool for learning networks

BACKGROUND: The vision of learning healthcare systems (LHSs) is attractive as a more effective model for health care services, but achieving the vision is complex. There is limited literature describing the processes needed to construct such multicomponent systems or to assess development. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lannon, Carole, Schuler, Christine L., Seid, Michael, Provost, Lloyd P., Fuller, Sandra, Purcell, David, Forrest, Christopher B., Margolis, Peter A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10232
_version_ 1783679729682874368
author Lannon, Carole
Schuler, Christine L.
Seid, Michael
Provost, Lloyd P.
Fuller, Sandra
Purcell, David
Forrest, Christopher B.
Margolis, Peter A.
author_facet Lannon, Carole
Schuler, Christine L.
Seid, Michael
Provost, Lloyd P.
Fuller, Sandra
Purcell, David
Forrest, Christopher B.
Margolis, Peter A.
author_sort Lannon, Carole
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The vision of learning healthcare systems (LHSs) is attractive as a more effective model for health care services, but achieving the vision is complex. There is limited literature describing the processes needed to construct such multicomponent systems or to assess development. METHODS: We used the concept of a capability maturity matrix to describe the maturation of necessary infrastructure and processes to create learning networks (LNs), multisite collaborative LHSs that use an actor‐oriented network organizational architecture. We developed a network maturity grid (NMG) assessment tool by incorporating information from literature review, content theory from existing networks, and expert opinion to establish domains and components. We refined the maturity grid in response to feedback from network leadership teams. We followed NMG scores over time for nine LNs and plotted scores for each domain component with respect to SD for one participating network. We sought subjective feedback on the experience of applying the NMG to individual networks. RESULTS: LN leaders evaluated the scope, depth, and applicability of the NMG to their networks. Qualitative feedback from network leaders indicated that changes in NMG scores over time aligned with leaders' reports about growth in specific domains; changes in scores were consistent with network efforts to improve in various areas. Scores over time showed differences in maturation in the individual domains of each network. Scoring patterns, and SD for domain component scores, indicated consistency among LN leaders in some but not all aspects of network maturity. A case example from a participating network highlighted the value of the NMG in prompting strategic discussions about network development and demonstrated that the process of using the tool was itself valuable. CONCLUSIONS: The capability maturity grid proposed here provides a framework to help those interested in creating Learning Health Networks plan and develop them over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8051339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80513392021-04-21 A maturity grid assessment tool for learning networks Lannon, Carole Schuler, Christine L. Seid, Michael Provost, Lloyd P. Fuller, Sandra Purcell, David Forrest, Christopher B. Margolis, Peter A. Learn Health Syst Research Reports BACKGROUND: The vision of learning healthcare systems (LHSs) is attractive as a more effective model for health care services, but achieving the vision is complex. There is limited literature describing the processes needed to construct such multicomponent systems or to assess development. METHODS: We used the concept of a capability maturity matrix to describe the maturation of necessary infrastructure and processes to create learning networks (LNs), multisite collaborative LHSs that use an actor‐oriented network organizational architecture. We developed a network maturity grid (NMG) assessment tool by incorporating information from literature review, content theory from existing networks, and expert opinion to establish domains and components. We refined the maturity grid in response to feedback from network leadership teams. We followed NMG scores over time for nine LNs and plotted scores for each domain component with respect to SD for one participating network. We sought subjective feedback on the experience of applying the NMG to individual networks. RESULTS: LN leaders evaluated the scope, depth, and applicability of the NMG to their networks. Qualitative feedback from network leaders indicated that changes in NMG scores over time aligned with leaders' reports about growth in specific domains; changes in scores were consistent with network efforts to improve in various areas. Scores over time showed differences in maturation in the individual domains of each network. Scoring patterns, and SD for domain component scores, indicated consistency among LN leaders in some but not all aspects of network maturity. A case example from a participating network highlighted the value of the NMG in prompting strategic discussions about network development and demonstrated that the process of using the tool was itself valuable. CONCLUSIONS: The capability maturity grid proposed here provides a framework to help those interested in creating Learning Health Networks plan and develop them over time. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8051339/ /pubmed/33889737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10232 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Learning Health Systems published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the University of Michigan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Reports
Lannon, Carole
Schuler, Christine L.
Seid, Michael
Provost, Lloyd P.
Fuller, Sandra
Purcell, David
Forrest, Christopher B.
Margolis, Peter A.
A maturity grid assessment tool for learning networks
title A maturity grid assessment tool for learning networks
title_full A maturity grid assessment tool for learning networks
title_fullStr A maturity grid assessment tool for learning networks
title_full_unstemmed A maturity grid assessment tool for learning networks
title_short A maturity grid assessment tool for learning networks
title_sort maturity grid assessment tool for learning networks
topic Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10232
work_keys_str_mv AT lannoncarole amaturitygridassessmenttoolforlearningnetworks
AT schulerchristinel amaturitygridassessmenttoolforlearningnetworks
AT seidmichael amaturitygridassessmenttoolforlearningnetworks
AT provostlloydp amaturitygridassessmenttoolforlearningnetworks
AT fullersandra amaturitygridassessmenttoolforlearningnetworks
AT purcelldavid amaturitygridassessmenttoolforlearningnetworks
AT forrestchristopherb amaturitygridassessmenttoolforlearningnetworks
AT margolispetera amaturitygridassessmenttoolforlearningnetworks
AT lannoncarole maturitygridassessmenttoolforlearningnetworks
AT schulerchristinel maturitygridassessmenttoolforlearningnetworks
AT seidmichael maturitygridassessmenttoolforlearningnetworks
AT provostlloydp maturitygridassessmenttoolforlearningnetworks
AT fullersandra maturitygridassessmenttoolforlearningnetworks
AT purcelldavid maturitygridassessmenttoolforlearningnetworks
AT forrestchristopherb maturitygridassessmenttoolforlearningnetworks
AT margolispetera maturitygridassessmenttoolforlearningnetworks