Cargando…

A pilot study to assess the learning environment and use of reliability enhancing work practices in VHA cardiac catheterization laboratories

INTRODUCTION: A learning health system (LHS) harnesses data and analytics to learn from clinical encounters to implement the best care with high reliability. The 81 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) cardiac catheterization laboratories (cath lab) are a model LHS. The quality and safety of coronar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gilmartin, Heather M., Hess, Edward, Mueller, Candice, Plomondon, Mary E., Waldo, Stephen W., Battaglia, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10227
_version_ 1783679731582894080
author Gilmartin, Heather M.
Hess, Edward
Mueller, Candice
Plomondon, Mary E.
Waldo, Stephen W.
Battaglia, Catherine
author_facet Gilmartin, Heather M.
Hess, Edward
Mueller, Candice
Plomondon, Mary E.
Waldo, Stephen W.
Battaglia, Catherine
author_sort Gilmartin, Heather M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A learning health system (LHS) harnesses data and analytics to learn from clinical encounters to implement the best care with high reliability. The 81 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) cardiac catheterization laboratories (cath lab) are a model LHS. The quality and safety of coronary procedures are monitored and reported by the Clinical Assessment, Reporting and Tracking (CART) Program, which has identified variation in care across cath labs. This variation may be due to underappreciated aspects of LHSs, the learning environment and reliability enhancing work practices (REWPs). Learning environments are the educational approaches, context, and settings in which learning occurs. REWPs are the organizational practices found in high reliability organizations. High learning environments and use of REWPs are associated with improved outcomes. This study assessed the learning environments and use of REWPs in VHA cath labs to examine factors supportive of learning and high reliability. METHODS: In 2018, the learning organization survey‐27 and the REWP survey were administered to 732 cath lab staff. Factor analysis and linear models were computed. Unit‐level analyses and site ranking (high, low) were conducted on cath labs with >40% response rate using Bayesian methods. RESULTS: Surveys from 40% of cath lab staff (n = 294) at 84% of cath labs (n = 68) were included. Learning environment and REWP strengths across cath labs include the presence of training programs, openness to new ideas, and respectful interaction. Learning environment and REWP gaps include lack of structured knowledge transfer (eg, checklists) and low use of forums for improvement. Survey dimensions matched established factor structures and demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach's alpha >.76). Unit‐level analyses were conducted for 29 cath labs. One ranked as high and four as low learning environments. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates an approach to assess local learning environments and use of REWPs, providing insights for systems working to become a LHS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8051348
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80513482021-04-21 A pilot study to assess the learning environment and use of reliability enhancing work practices in VHA cardiac catheterization laboratories Gilmartin, Heather M. Hess, Edward Mueller, Candice Plomondon, Mary E. Waldo, Stephen W. Battaglia, Catherine Learn Health Syst Briefs INTRODUCTION: A learning health system (LHS) harnesses data and analytics to learn from clinical encounters to implement the best care with high reliability. The 81 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) cardiac catheterization laboratories (cath lab) are a model LHS. The quality and safety of coronary procedures are monitored and reported by the Clinical Assessment, Reporting and Tracking (CART) Program, which has identified variation in care across cath labs. This variation may be due to underappreciated aspects of LHSs, the learning environment and reliability enhancing work practices (REWPs). Learning environments are the educational approaches, context, and settings in which learning occurs. REWPs are the organizational practices found in high reliability organizations. High learning environments and use of REWPs are associated with improved outcomes. This study assessed the learning environments and use of REWPs in VHA cath labs to examine factors supportive of learning and high reliability. METHODS: In 2018, the learning organization survey‐27 and the REWP survey were administered to 732 cath lab staff. Factor analysis and linear models were computed. Unit‐level analyses and site ranking (high, low) were conducted on cath labs with >40% response rate using Bayesian methods. RESULTS: Surveys from 40% of cath lab staff (n = 294) at 84% of cath labs (n = 68) were included. Learning environment and REWP strengths across cath labs include the presence of training programs, openness to new ideas, and respectful interaction. Learning environment and REWP gaps include lack of structured knowledge transfer (eg, checklists) and low use of forums for improvement. Survey dimensions matched established factor structures and demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach's alpha >.76). Unit‐level analyses were conducted for 29 cath labs. One ranked as high and four as low learning environments. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates an approach to assess local learning environments and use of REWPs, providing insights for systems working to become a LHS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8051348/ /pubmed/33889736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10227 Text en Published 2020. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Learning Health Systems published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of University of Michigan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Briefs
Gilmartin, Heather M.
Hess, Edward
Mueller, Candice
Plomondon, Mary E.
Waldo, Stephen W.
Battaglia, Catherine
A pilot study to assess the learning environment and use of reliability enhancing work practices in VHA cardiac catheterization laboratories
title A pilot study to assess the learning environment and use of reliability enhancing work practices in VHA cardiac catheterization laboratories
title_full A pilot study to assess the learning environment and use of reliability enhancing work practices in VHA cardiac catheterization laboratories
title_fullStr A pilot study to assess the learning environment and use of reliability enhancing work practices in VHA cardiac catheterization laboratories
title_full_unstemmed A pilot study to assess the learning environment and use of reliability enhancing work practices in VHA cardiac catheterization laboratories
title_short A pilot study to assess the learning environment and use of reliability enhancing work practices in VHA cardiac catheterization laboratories
title_sort pilot study to assess the learning environment and use of reliability enhancing work practices in vha cardiac catheterization laboratories
topic Briefs
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10227
work_keys_str_mv AT gilmartinheatherm apilotstudytoassessthelearningenvironmentanduseofreliabilityenhancingworkpracticesinvhacardiaccatheterizationlaboratories
AT hessedward apilotstudytoassessthelearningenvironmentanduseofreliabilityenhancingworkpracticesinvhacardiaccatheterizationlaboratories
AT muellercandice apilotstudytoassessthelearningenvironmentanduseofreliabilityenhancingworkpracticesinvhacardiaccatheterizationlaboratories
AT plomondonmarye apilotstudytoassessthelearningenvironmentanduseofreliabilityenhancingworkpracticesinvhacardiaccatheterizationlaboratories
AT waldostephenw apilotstudytoassessthelearningenvironmentanduseofreliabilityenhancingworkpracticesinvhacardiaccatheterizationlaboratories
AT battagliacatherine apilotstudytoassessthelearningenvironmentanduseofreliabilityenhancingworkpracticesinvhacardiaccatheterizationlaboratories
AT gilmartinheatherm pilotstudytoassessthelearningenvironmentanduseofreliabilityenhancingworkpracticesinvhacardiaccatheterizationlaboratories
AT hessedward pilotstudytoassessthelearningenvironmentanduseofreliabilityenhancingworkpracticesinvhacardiaccatheterizationlaboratories
AT muellercandice pilotstudytoassessthelearningenvironmentanduseofreliabilityenhancingworkpracticesinvhacardiaccatheterizationlaboratories
AT plomondonmarye pilotstudytoassessthelearningenvironmentanduseofreliabilityenhancingworkpracticesinvhacardiaccatheterizationlaboratories
AT waldostephenw pilotstudytoassessthelearningenvironmentanduseofreliabilityenhancingworkpracticesinvhacardiaccatheterizationlaboratories
AT battagliacatherine pilotstudytoassessthelearningenvironmentanduseofreliabilityenhancingworkpracticesinvhacardiaccatheterizationlaboratories