Cargando…

An evaluation of the implementation of quality improvement (QI) in primary care dentistry: a multi-method approach

OBJECTIVES: Ensuring that healthcare is patient-centred, safe and harm free is the cornerstone of the NHS. The Scottish Patient Safety Programme (SPSP) is a national initiative to support the provision of safe, high-quality care. SPSP promotes a coordinated approach to quality improvement (QI) in pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cassie, Heather, Mistry, Vinay, Beaton, Laura, Black, Irene, Clarkson, Janet E, Young, Linda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000839
_version_ 1783679734386786304
author Cassie, Heather
Mistry, Vinay
Beaton, Laura
Black, Irene
Clarkson, Janet E
Young, Linda
author_facet Cassie, Heather
Mistry, Vinay
Beaton, Laura
Black, Irene
Clarkson, Janet E
Young, Linda
author_sort Cassie, Heather
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Ensuring that healthcare is patient-centred, safe and harm free is the cornerstone of the NHS. The Scottish Patient Safety Programme (SPSP) is a national initiative to support the provision of safe, high-quality care. SPSP promotes a coordinated approach to quality improvement (QI) in primary care by providing evidence-based methods, such as the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s Breakthrough Series Collaborative methodology. These methods are relatively untested within dentistry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact to inform the development and implementation of improvement collaboratives as a means for QI in primary care dentistry. DESIGN: A multimethod study underpinned by the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Kirkpatrick model. Quantitative data were collected using baseline and follow-up questionnaires, designed to explore beliefs and behaviours towards improving quality in practice. Qualitative data were gathered using interviews with dental team members and practice-based case studies. RESULTS: One hundred and eleven dental team members completed the baseline questionnaire. Follow-up questionnaires were returned by 79 team members. Twelve practices, including two case studies, participated in evaluation interviews. Findings identified positive beliefs and increased knowledge and skills towards QI, as well as increased confidence about using QI methodologies in practice. Barriers included time, poor patient and team engagement, communication and leadership. Facilitators included team working, clear roles, strong leadership, training, peer support and visible benefits. Participants’ knowledge and skills were identified as an area for improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrate increased knowledge, skills and confidence in relation to QI methodology and highlight areas for improvement. This is an example of partnership working between the Scottish Government and NHSScotland towards a shared ambition to provide safe care to every patient. More work is required to evaluate the sustainability and transferability of improvement collaboratives as a means for QI in dentistry and wider primary care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8051365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80513652021-04-26 An evaluation of the implementation of quality improvement (QI) in primary care dentistry: a multi-method approach Cassie, Heather Mistry, Vinay Beaton, Laura Black, Irene Clarkson, Janet E Young, Linda BMJ Open Qual Original Research OBJECTIVES: Ensuring that healthcare is patient-centred, safe and harm free is the cornerstone of the NHS. The Scottish Patient Safety Programme (SPSP) is a national initiative to support the provision of safe, high-quality care. SPSP promotes a coordinated approach to quality improvement (QI) in primary care by providing evidence-based methods, such as the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s Breakthrough Series Collaborative methodology. These methods are relatively untested within dentistry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact to inform the development and implementation of improvement collaboratives as a means for QI in primary care dentistry. DESIGN: A multimethod study underpinned by the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Kirkpatrick model. Quantitative data were collected using baseline and follow-up questionnaires, designed to explore beliefs and behaviours towards improving quality in practice. Qualitative data were gathered using interviews with dental team members and practice-based case studies. RESULTS: One hundred and eleven dental team members completed the baseline questionnaire. Follow-up questionnaires were returned by 79 team members. Twelve practices, including two case studies, participated in evaluation interviews. Findings identified positive beliefs and increased knowledge and skills towards QI, as well as increased confidence about using QI methodologies in practice. Barriers included time, poor patient and team engagement, communication and leadership. Facilitators included team working, clear roles, strong leadership, training, peer support and visible benefits. Participants’ knowledge and skills were identified as an area for improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrate increased knowledge, skills and confidence in relation to QI methodology and highlight areas for improvement. This is an example of partnership working between the Scottish Government and NHSScotland towards a shared ambition to provide safe care to every patient. More work is required to evaluate the sustainability and transferability of improvement collaboratives as a means for QI in dentistry and wider primary care. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8051365/ /pubmed/33849904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000839 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Cassie, Heather
Mistry, Vinay
Beaton, Laura
Black, Irene
Clarkson, Janet E
Young, Linda
An evaluation of the implementation of quality improvement (QI) in primary care dentistry: a multi-method approach
title An evaluation of the implementation of quality improvement (QI) in primary care dentistry: a multi-method approach
title_full An evaluation of the implementation of quality improvement (QI) in primary care dentistry: a multi-method approach
title_fullStr An evaluation of the implementation of quality improvement (QI) in primary care dentistry: a multi-method approach
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the implementation of quality improvement (QI) in primary care dentistry: a multi-method approach
title_short An evaluation of the implementation of quality improvement (QI) in primary care dentistry: a multi-method approach
title_sort evaluation of the implementation of quality improvement (qi) in primary care dentistry: a multi-method approach
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000839
work_keys_str_mv AT cassieheather anevaluationoftheimplementationofqualityimprovementqiinprimarycaredentistryamultimethodapproach
AT mistryvinay anevaluationoftheimplementationofqualityimprovementqiinprimarycaredentistryamultimethodapproach
AT beatonlaura anevaluationoftheimplementationofqualityimprovementqiinprimarycaredentistryamultimethodapproach
AT blackirene anevaluationoftheimplementationofqualityimprovementqiinprimarycaredentistryamultimethodapproach
AT clarksonjanete anevaluationoftheimplementationofqualityimprovementqiinprimarycaredentistryamultimethodapproach
AT younglinda anevaluationoftheimplementationofqualityimprovementqiinprimarycaredentistryamultimethodapproach
AT cassieheather evaluationoftheimplementationofqualityimprovementqiinprimarycaredentistryamultimethodapproach
AT mistryvinay evaluationoftheimplementationofqualityimprovementqiinprimarycaredentistryamultimethodapproach
AT beatonlaura evaluationoftheimplementationofqualityimprovementqiinprimarycaredentistryamultimethodapproach
AT blackirene evaluationoftheimplementationofqualityimprovementqiinprimarycaredentistryamultimethodapproach
AT clarksonjanete evaluationoftheimplementationofqualityimprovementqiinprimarycaredentistryamultimethodapproach
AT younglinda evaluationoftheimplementationofqualityimprovementqiinprimarycaredentistryamultimethodapproach