Cargando…
Protocol for a scoping review exploring the use of patient-reported outcomes in adult social care
INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are measures of a person’s own views of their health, functioning and quality of life. They are typically assessed using validated, self-completed questionnaires known as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PROMs are used in healthcare settings t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045206 |
_version_ | 1783679737863864320 |
---|---|
author | Hughes, Sarah E Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee Lasserson, Daniel S Collis, Philip Cruz Rivera, Samantha McMullan, Christel Turner, Grace M Glasby, Jon Calvert, Melanie |
author_facet | Hughes, Sarah E Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee Lasserson, Daniel S Collis, Philip Cruz Rivera, Samantha McMullan, Christel Turner, Grace M Glasby, Jon Calvert, Melanie |
author_sort | Hughes, Sarah E |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are measures of a person’s own views of their health, functioning and quality of life. They are typically assessed using validated, self-completed questionnaires known as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PROMs are used in healthcare settings to support care planning, clinical decision-making, patient–practitioner communication and quality improvement. PROMs have a potential role in the delivery of social care where people often have multiple and complex long-term health conditions. However, the use of PROMs in this context is currently unclear. The objective of this scoping review is to explore the evidence relating to the use of PROMs in adult social care. METHODS AND ANALYSES: The electronic databases Medline (Ovid), PsychInfo (Ovid), ASSIA (ProQuest), Social Care Online (SCIE), Web of Science and EMBASE (Ovid) were searched on 29 September 2020 to identify eligible studies and other publically available documents published since 2010. A grey literature search and hand searching of citations and reference lists of the included studies will also be undertaken. No restrictions on study design or language of publication will be applied. Screening and data extraction will be completed independently by two reviewers. Quality appraisal of the included documents will use the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme and AACODS (Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Objectivity, Date, Significance) checklists. A customised data charting table will be used for data extraction, with analysis of qualitative data using the framework method. The review findings will be presented as tables and in a narrative summary. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical review is not required as scoping reviews are a form of secondary data analysis that synthesise data from publically available sources. Review findings will be shared with service users and other relevant stakeholders and disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. This protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework (www.osf.io). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8051391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80513912021-04-26 Protocol for a scoping review exploring the use of patient-reported outcomes in adult social care Hughes, Sarah E Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee Lasserson, Daniel S Collis, Philip Cruz Rivera, Samantha McMullan, Christel Turner, Grace M Glasby, Jon Calvert, Melanie BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are measures of a person’s own views of their health, functioning and quality of life. They are typically assessed using validated, self-completed questionnaires known as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PROMs are used in healthcare settings to support care planning, clinical decision-making, patient–practitioner communication and quality improvement. PROMs have a potential role in the delivery of social care where people often have multiple and complex long-term health conditions. However, the use of PROMs in this context is currently unclear. The objective of this scoping review is to explore the evidence relating to the use of PROMs in adult social care. METHODS AND ANALYSES: The electronic databases Medline (Ovid), PsychInfo (Ovid), ASSIA (ProQuest), Social Care Online (SCIE), Web of Science and EMBASE (Ovid) were searched on 29 September 2020 to identify eligible studies and other publically available documents published since 2010. A grey literature search and hand searching of citations and reference lists of the included studies will also be undertaken. No restrictions on study design or language of publication will be applied. Screening and data extraction will be completed independently by two reviewers. Quality appraisal of the included documents will use the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme and AACODS (Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Objectivity, Date, Significance) checklists. A customised data charting table will be used for data extraction, with analysis of qualitative data using the framework method. The review findings will be presented as tables and in a narrative summary. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical review is not required as scoping reviews are a form of secondary data analysis that synthesise data from publically available sources. Review findings will be shared with service users and other relevant stakeholders and disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. This protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework (www.osf.io). BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8051391/ /pubmed/33849854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045206 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Patient-Centred Medicine Hughes, Sarah E Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee Lasserson, Daniel S Collis, Philip Cruz Rivera, Samantha McMullan, Christel Turner, Grace M Glasby, Jon Calvert, Melanie Protocol for a scoping review exploring the use of patient-reported outcomes in adult social care |
title | Protocol for a scoping review exploring the use of patient-reported outcomes in adult social care |
title_full | Protocol for a scoping review exploring the use of patient-reported outcomes in adult social care |
title_fullStr | Protocol for a scoping review exploring the use of patient-reported outcomes in adult social care |
title_full_unstemmed | Protocol for a scoping review exploring the use of patient-reported outcomes in adult social care |
title_short | Protocol for a scoping review exploring the use of patient-reported outcomes in adult social care |
title_sort | protocol for a scoping review exploring the use of patient-reported outcomes in adult social care |
topic | Patient-Centred Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045206 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hughessarahe protocolforascopingreviewexploringtheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinadultsocialcare AT aiyegbusiolalekanlee protocolforascopingreviewexploringtheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinadultsocialcare AT lassersondaniels protocolforascopingreviewexploringtheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinadultsocialcare AT collisphilip protocolforascopingreviewexploringtheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinadultsocialcare AT cruzriverasamantha protocolforascopingreviewexploringtheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinadultsocialcare AT mcmullanchristel protocolforascopingreviewexploringtheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinadultsocialcare AT turnergracem protocolforascopingreviewexploringtheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinadultsocialcare AT glasbyjon protocolforascopingreviewexploringtheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinadultsocialcare AT calvertmelanie protocolforascopingreviewexploringtheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinadultsocialcare |