Cargando…

Differences in spatial distribution between WHO 2016 low-grade glioma molecular subgroups

BACKGROUND: Several studies reported a correlation between anatomic location and genetic background of low-grade gliomas (LGGs). As such, tumor location may contribute to presurgical clinical decision-making. Our purpose was to visualize and compare the spatial distribution of different WHO 2016 gli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wijnenga, Maarten M J, van der Voort, Sebastian R, French, Pim J, Klein, Stefan, Dubbink, Hendrikus J, Dinjens, Winand N M, Atmodimedjo, Peggy N, de Groot, Marius, Kros, Johan M, Schouten, Joost W, Dirven, Clemens M F, Vincent, Arnaud J P E, Smits, Marion, van den Bent, Martin J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz001
_version_ 1783679745794244608
author Wijnenga, Maarten M J
van der Voort, Sebastian R
French, Pim J
Klein, Stefan
Dubbink, Hendrikus J
Dinjens, Winand N M
Atmodimedjo, Peggy N
de Groot, Marius
Kros, Johan M
Schouten, Joost W
Dirven, Clemens M F
Vincent, Arnaud J P E
Smits, Marion
van den Bent, Martin J
author_facet Wijnenga, Maarten M J
van der Voort, Sebastian R
French, Pim J
Klein, Stefan
Dubbink, Hendrikus J
Dinjens, Winand N M
Atmodimedjo, Peggy N
de Groot, Marius
Kros, Johan M
Schouten, Joost W
Dirven, Clemens M F
Vincent, Arnaud J P E
Smits, Marion
van den Bent, Martin J
author_sort Wijnenga, Maarten M J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several studies reported a correlation between anatomic location and genetic background of low-grade gliomas (LGGs). As such, tumor location may contribute to presurgical clinical decision-making. Our purpose was to visualize and compare the spatial distribution of different WHO 2016 gliomas, frequently aberrated single genes and DNA copy number alterations within subgroups, and groups of postoperative tumor volume. METHODS: Adult grade II glioma patients (WHO 2016 classified) diagnosed between 2003 and 2016 were included. Tumor volume and location were assessed with semi-automatic software. All volumes of interest were mapped to a standard reference brain. Location heatmaps were created for each WHO 2016 glioma subgroup, frequently aberrated single genes and copy numbers (CNVs), as well as heatmaps according to groups of postoperative tumor volume. Differences between subgroups were determined using voxelwise permutation testing. RESULTS: A total of 110 IDH mutated astrocytoma patients, 92 IDH mutated and 1p19q co-deleted oligodendroglioma patients, and 22 IDH wild-type astrocytoma patients were included. We identified small regions in which specific molecular subtypes occurred more frequently. IDH-mutated LGGs were more frequently located in the frontal lobes and IDH wild-type tumors more frequently in the basal ganglia of the right hemisphere. We found no localizations of significant difference for single genes/CNVs in subgroups, except for loss of 9p in oligodendrogliomas with a predilection for the left parietal lobes. More extensive resections in LGG were associated with frontal locations. CONCLUSIONS: WHO low-grade glioma subgroups show differences in spatial distribution. Our data may contribute to presurgical clinical decision-making in LGG patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8051437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80514372021-04-21 Differences in spatial distribution between WHO 2016 low-grade glioma molecular subgroups Wijnenga, Maarten M J van der Voort, Sebastian R French, Pim J Klein, Stefan Dubbink, Hendrikus J Dinjens, Winand N M Atmodimedjo, Peggy N de Groot, Marius Kros, Johan M Schouten, Joost W Dirven, Clemens M F Vincent, Arnaud J P E Smits, Marion van den Bent, Martin J Neurooncol Adv Clinical Investigation BACKGROUND: Several studies reported a correlation between anatomic location and genetic background of low-grade gliomas (LGGs). As such, tumor location may contribute to presurgical clinical decision-making. Our purpose was to visualize and compare the spatial distribution of different WHO 2016 gliomas, frequently aberrated single genes and DNA copy number alterations within subgroups, and groups of postoperative tumor volume. METHODS: Adult grade II glioma patients (WHO 2016 classified) diagnosed between 2003 and 2016 were included. Tumor volume and location were assessed with semi-automatic software. All volumes of interest were mapped to a standard reference brain. Location heatmaps were created for each WHO 2016 glioma subgroup, frequently aberrated single genes and copy numbers (CNVs), as well as heatmaps according to groups of postoperative tumor volume. Differences between subgroups were determined using voxelwise permutation testing. RESULTS: A total of 110 IDH mutated astrocytoma patients, 92 IDH mutated and 1p19q co-deleted oligodendroglioma patients, and 22 IDH wild-type astrocytoma patients were included. We identified small regions in which specific molecular subtypes occurred more frequently. IDH-mutated LGGs were more frequently located in the frontal lobes and IDH wild-type tumors more frequently in the basal ganglia of the right hemisphere. We found no localizations of significant difference for single genes/CNVs in subgroups, except for loss of 9p in oligodendrogliomas with a predilection for the left parietal lobes. More extensive resections in LGG were associated with frontal locations. CONCLUSIONS: WHO low-grade glioma subgroups show differences in spatial distribution. Our data may contribute to presurgical clinical decision-making in LGG patients. Oxford University Press 2019-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8051437/ /pubmed/33889844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz001 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Wijnenga, Maarten M J
van der Voort, Sebastian R
French, Pim J
Klein, Stefan
Dubbink, Hendrikus J
Dinjens, Winand N M
Atmodimedjo, Peggy N
de Groot, Marius
Kros, Johan M
Schouten, Joost W
Dirven, Clemens M F
Vincent, Arnaud J P E
Smits, Marion
van den Bent, Martin J
Differences in spatial distribution between WHO 2016 low-grade glioma molecular subgroups
title Differences in spatial distribution between WHO 2016 low-grade glioma molecular subgroups
title_full Differences in spatial distribution between WHO 2016 low-grade glioma molecular subgroups
title_fullStr Differences in spatial distribution between WHO 2016 low-grade glioma molecular subgroups
title_full_unstemmed Differences in spatial distribution between WHO 2016 low-grade glioma molecular subgroups
title_short Differences in spatial distribution between WHO 2016 low-grade glioma molecular subgroups
title_sort differences in spatial distribution between who 2016 low-grade glioma molecular subgroups
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz001
work_keys_str_mv AT wijnengamaartenmj differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups
AT vandervoortsebastianr differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups
AT frenchpimj differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups
AT kleinstefan differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups
AT dubbinkhendrikusj differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups
AT dinjenswinandnm differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups
AT atmodimedjopeggyn differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups
AT degrootmarius differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups
AT krosjohanm differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups
AT schoutenjoostw differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups
AT dirvenclemensmf differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups
AT vincentarnaudjpe differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups
AT smitsmarion differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups
AT vandenbentmartinj differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups