Cargando…
Differences in spatial distribution between WHO 2016 low-grade glioma molecular subgroups
BACKGROUND: Several studies reported a correlation between anatomic location and genetic background of low-grade gliomas (LGGs). As such, tumor location may contribute to presurgical clinical decision-making. Our purpose was to visualize and compare the spatial distribution of different WHO 2016 gli...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz001 |
_version_ | 1783679745794244608 |
---|---|
author | Wijnenga, Maarten M J van der Voort, Sebastian R French, Pim J Klein, Stefan Dubbink, Hendrikus J Dinjens, Winand N M Atmodimedjo, Peggy N de Groot, Marius Kros, Johan M Schouten, Joost W Dirven, Clemens M F Vincent, Arnaud J P E Smits, Marion van den Bent, Martin J |
author_facet | Wijnenga, Maarten M J van der Voort, Sebastian R French, Pim J Klein, Stefan Dubbink, Hendrikus J Dinjens, Winand N M Atmodimedjo, Peggy N de Groot, Marius Kros, Johan M Schouten, Joost W Dirven, Clemens M F Vincent, Arnaud J P E Smits, Marion van den Bent, Martin J |
author_sort | Wijnenga, Maarten M J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several studies reported a correlation between anatomic location and genetic background of low-grade gliomas (LGGs). As such, tumor location may contribute to presurgical clinical decision-making. Our purpose was to visualize and compare the spatial distribution of different WHO 2016 gliomas, frequently aberrated single genes and DNA copy number alterations within subgroups, and groups of postoperative tumor volume. METHODS: Adult grade II glioma patients (WHO 2016 classified) diagnosed between 2003 and 2016 were included. Tumor volume and location were assessed with semi-automatic software. All volumes of interest were mapped to a standard reference brain. Location heatmaps were created for each WHO 2016 glioma subgroup, frequently aberrated single genes and copy numbers (CNVs), as well as heatmaps according to groups of postoperative tumor volume. Differences between subgroups were determined using voxelwise permutation testing. RESULTS: A total of 110 IDH mutated astrocytoma patients, 92 IDH mutated and 1p19q co-deleted oligodendroglioma patients, and 22 IDH wild-type astrocytoma patients were included. We identified small regions in which specific molecular subtypes occurred more frequently. IDH-mutated LGGs were more frequently located in the frontal lobes and IDH wild-type tumors more frequently in the basal ganglia of the right hemisphere. We found no localizations of significant difference for single genes/CNVs in subgroups, except for loss of 9p in oligodendrogliomas with a predilection for the left parietal lobes. More extensive resections in LGG were associated with frontal locations. CONCLUSIONS: WHO low-grade glioma subgroups show differences in spatial distribution. Our data may contribute to presurgical clinical decision-making in LGG patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8051437 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80514372021-04-21 Differences in spatial distribution between WHO 2016 low-grade glioma molecular subgroups Wijnenga, Maarten M J van der Voort, Sebastian R French, Pim J Klein, Stefan Dubbink, Hendrikus J Dinjens, Winand N M Atmodimedjo, Peggy N de Groot, Marius Kros, Johan M Schouten, Joost W Dirven, Clemens M F Vincent, Arnaud J P E Smits, Marion van den Bent, Martin J Neurooncol Adv Clinical Investigation BACKGROUND: Several studies reported a correlation between anatomic location and genetic background of low-grade gliomas (LGGs). As such, tumor location may contribute to presurgical clinical decision-making. Our purpose was to visualize and compare the spatial distribution of different WHO 2016 gliomas, frequently aberrated single genes and DNA copy number alterations within subgroups, and groups of postoperative tumor volume. METHODS: Adult grade II glioma patients (WHO 2016 classified) diagnosed between 2003 and 2016 were included. Tumor volume and location were assessed with semi-automatic software. All volumes of interest were mapped to a standard reference brain. Location heatmaps were created for each WHO 2016 glioma subgroup, frequently aberrated single genes and copy numbers (CNVs), as well as heatmaps according to groups of postoperative tumor volume. Differences between subgroups were determined using voxelwise permutation testing. RESULTS: A total of 110 IDH mutated astrocytoma patients, 92 IDH mutated and 1p19q co-deleted oligodendroglioma patients, and 22 IDH wild-type astrocytoma patients were included. We identified small regions in which specific molecular subtypes occurred more frequently. IDH-mutated LGGs were more frequently located in the frontal lobes and IDH wild-type tumors more frequently in the basal ganglia of the right hemisphere. We found no localizations of significant difference for single genes/CNVs in subgroups, except for loss of 9p in oligodendrogliomas with a predilection for the left parietal lobes. More extensive resections in LGG were associated with frontal locations. CONCLUSIONS: WHO low-grade glioma subgroups show differences in spatial distribution. Our data may contribute to presurgical clinical decision-making in LGG patients. Oxford University Press 2019-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8051437/ /pubmed/33889844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz001 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigation Wijnenga, Maarten M J van der Voort, Sebastian R French, Pim J Klein, Stefan Dubbink, Hendrikus J Dinjens, Winand N M Atmodimedjo, Peggy N de Groot, Marius Kros, Johan M Schouten, Joost W Dirven, Clemens M F Vincent, Arnaud J P E Smits, Marion van den Bent, Martin J Differences in spatial distribution between WHO 2016 low-grade glioma molecular subgroups |
title | Differences in spatial distribution between WHO 2016 low-grade glioma molecular subgroups |
title_full | Differences in spatial distribution between WHO 2016 low-grade glioma molecular subgroups |
title_fullStr | Differences in spatial distribution between WHO 2016 low-grade glioma molecular subgroups |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in spatial distribution between WHO 2016 low-grade glioma molecular subgroups |
title_short | Differences in spatial distribution between WHO 2016 low-grade glioma molecular subgroups |
title_sort | differences in spatial distribution between who 2016 low-grade glioma molecular subgroups |
topic | Clinical Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wijnengamaartenmj differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups AT vandervoortsebastianr differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups AT frenchpimj differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups AT kleinstefan differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups AT dubbinkhendrikusj differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups AT dinjenswinandnm differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups AT atmodimedjopeggyn differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups AT degrootmarius differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups AT krosjohanm differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups AT schoutenjoostw differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups AT dirvenclemensmf differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups AT vincentarnaudjpe differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups AT smitsmarion differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups AT vandenbentmartinj differencesinspatialdistributionbetweenwho2016lowgradegliomamolecularsubgroups |