On evidence fiascos and judgments in COVID-19 policy

Calls for evidence-based approaches to COVID-19 have sparked up discussions on the use of evidence for policy. In this note, we expand these discussions: while the debate has mostly focused on the types of evidence to be used for policy, we argue that the assessment of judgments involved in data pra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jukola, Saana, Canali, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Notes & Comments
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33864168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40656-021-00410-w
_version_ 1783679751605452800
author Jukola, Saana
Canali, Stefano
author_facet Jukola, Saana
Canali, Stefano
author_sort Jukola, Saana
collection PubMed
description Calls for evidence-based approaches to COVID-19 have sparked up discussions on the use of evidence for policy. In this note, we expand these discussions: while the debate has mostly focused on the types of evidence to be used for policy, we argue that the assessment of judgments involved in data practices and evidence production should play a central role in evaluating policy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8051544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80515442021-04-16 On evidence fiascos and judgments in COVID-19 policy Jukola, Saana Canali, Stefano Hist Philos Life Sci Notes & Comments Calls for evidence-based approaches to COVID-19 have sparked up discussions on the use of evidence for policy. In this note, we expand these discussions: while the debate has mostly focused on the types of evidence to be used for policy, we argue that the assessment of judgments involved in data practices and evidence production should play a central role in evaluating policy. Springer International Publishing 2021-04-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8051544/ /pubmed/33864168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40656-021-00410-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Notes & Comments
Jukola, Saana
Canali, Stefano
On evidence fiascos and judgments in COVID-19 policy
title On evidence fiascos and judgments in COVID-19 policy
title_full On evidence fiascos and judgments in COVID-19 policy
title_fullStr On evidence fiascos and judgments in COVID-19 policy
title_full_unstemmed On evidence fiascos and judgments in COVID-19 policy
title_short On evidence fiascos and judgments in COVID-19 policy
title_sort on evidence fiascos and judgments in covid-19 policy
topic Notes & Comments
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33864168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40656-021-00410-w
work_keys_str_mv AT jukolasaana onevidencefiascosandjudgmentsincovid19policy
AT canalistefano onevidencefiascosandjudgmentsincovid19policy

Ejemplares similares