Cargando…

Safety and Efficacy of Ivermectin and Doxycycline Monotherapy and in Combination in the Treatment of COVID-19: A Scoping Review

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Ivermectin (IVM) and doxycycline (DOXY) have demonstrated in-vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2, and have a reasonable safety profile. The objective of this systematic review was to explore the evidence in the literature on the safety and efficacy of their use as monothera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhowmick, Subhrojyoti, Dang, Amit, Vallish, B. N., Dang, Sumit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33864232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-021-01066-y
_version_ 1783679752544976896
author Bhowmick, Subhrojyoti
Dang, Amit
Vallish, B. N.
Dang, Sumit
author_facet Bhowmick, Subhrojyoti
Dang, Amit
Vallish, B. N.
Dang, Sumit
author_sort Bhowmick, Subhrojyoti
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Ivermectin (IVM) and doxycycline (DOXY) have demonstrated in-vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2, and have a reasonable safety profile. The objective of this systematic review was to explore the evidence in the literature on the safety and efficacy of their use as monotherapy and combination therapy in COVID-19 management. METHODS: After prospectively registering the study protocol with the Open Science Framework, we searched PubMed, Google Scholar, clinicaltrials.gov, various pre-print servers and reference lists for relevant records published until 16 February, 2021 using appropriate search strategies. Baseline features and data pertaining to efficacy and safety outcomes were extracted separately for IVM monotherapy, DOXY monotherapy, and IVM + DOXY combination therapy. Methodological quality was assessed based on the study design. RESULTS: Out of 200 articles screened, 19 studies (six retrospective cohort studies, seven randomised controlled trials, five non-randomised trials, one case series) with 8754 unique patients with multiple stages of COVID-19 were included; four were pre-prints and one was an unpublished clinicaltrials.gov document. The comparator was standard care and ‘hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin’ in seven and three studies respectively, and two studies were placebo controlled; six studies did not have a comparator. IVM monotherapy, DOXY monotherapy and IVM + DOXY were explored in eight, five and five studies, respectively; one study compared IVM monotherapy and IVM + DOXY with placebo. While all studies described efficacy, the safety profile was described in only six studies. Efficacy outcomes were mixed with some studies concluding in favour of the intervention and some studies displaying no significant benefit; barring one study that described 9/183 patients with erosive esophagitis and non-ulcer dyspepsia with IVM + DOXY (without causality assessment details), there were no new safety signals of concern with any of the three interventions considered. The quality of studies varied widely, with five studies having a ‘good’ methodological quality. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence is not sufficiently strong to either promote or refute the efficacy of IVM, DOXY, or their combination in COVID-19 management. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL REGISTRATION DETAILS: Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/n7r2j. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40264-021-01066-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8051548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80515482021-04-16 Safety and Efficacy of Ivermectin and Doxycycline Monotherapy and in Combination in the Treatment of COVID-19: A Scoping Review Bhowmick, Subhrojyoti Dang, Amit Vallish, B. N. Dang, Sumit Drug Saf Systematic Review INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Ivermectin (IVM) and doxycycline (DOXY) have demonstrated in-vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2, and have a reasonable safety profile. The objective of this systematic review was to explore the evidence in the literature on the safety and efficacy of their use as monotherapy and combination therapy in COVID-19 management. METHODS: After prospectively registering the study protocol with the Open Science Framework, we searched PubMed, Google Scholar, clinicaltrials.gov, various pre-print servers and reference lists for relevant records published until 16 February, 2021 using appropriate search strategies. Baseline features and data pertaining to efficacy and safety outcomes were extracted separately for IVM monotherapy, DOXY monotherapy, and IVM + DOXY combination therapy. Methodological quality was assessed based on the study design. RESULTS: Out of 200 articles screened, 19 studies (six retrospective cohort studies, seven randomised controlled trials, five non-randomised trials, one case series) with 8754 unique patients with multiple stages of COVID-19 were included; four were pre-prints and one was an unpublished clinicaltrials.gov document. The comparator was standard care and ‘hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin’ in seven and three studies respectively, and two studies were placebo controlled; six studies did not have a comparator. IVM monotherapy, DOXY monotherapy and IVM + DOXY were explored in eight, five and five studies, respectively; one study compared IVM monotherapy and IVM + DOXY with placebo. While all studies described efficacy, the safety profile was described in only six studies. Efficacy outcomes were mixed with some studies concluding in favour of the intervention and some studies displaying no significant benefit; barring one study that described 9/183 patients with erosive esophagitis and non-ulcer dyspepsia with IVM + DOXY (without causality assessment details), there were no new safety signals of concern with any of the three interventions considered. The quality of studies varied widely, with five studies having a ‘good’ methodological quality. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence is not sufficiently strong to either promote or refute the efficacy of IVM, DOXY, or their combination in COVID-19 management. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL REGISTRATION DETAILS: Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/n7r2j. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40264-021-01066-y. Springer International Publishing 2021-04-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8051548/ /pubmed/33864232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-021-01066-y Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Bhowmick, Subhrojyoti
Dang, Amit
Vallish, B. N.
Dang, Sumit
Safety and Efficacy of Ivermectin and Doxycycline Monotherapy and in Combination in the Treatment of COVID-19: A Scoping Review
title Safety and Efficacy of Ivermectin and Doxycycline Monotherapy and in Combination in the Treatment of COVID-19: A Scoping Review
title_full Safety and Efficacy of Ivermectin and Doxycycline Monotherapy and in Combination in the Treatment of COVID-19: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Safety and Efficacy of Ivermectin and Doxycycline Monotherapy and in Combination in the Treatment of COVID-19: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Efficacy of Ivermectin and Doxycycline Monotherapy and in Combination in the Treatment of COVID-19: A Scoping Review
title_short Safety and Efficacy of Ivermectin and Doxycycline Monotherapy and in Combination in the Treatment of COVID-19: A Scoping Review
title_sort safety and efficacy of ivermectin and doxycycline monotherapy and in combination in the treatment of covid-19: a scoping review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33864232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-021-01066-y
work_keys_str_mv AT bhowmicksubhrojyoti safetyandefficacyofivermectinanddoxycyclinemonotherapyandincombinationinthetreatmentofcovid19ascopingreview
AT dangamit safetyandefficacyofivermectinanddoxycyclinemonotherapyandincombinationinthetreatmentofcovid19ascopingreview
AT vallishbn safetyandefficacyofivermectinanddoxycyclinemonotherapyandincombinationinthetreatmentofcovid19ascopingreview
AT dangsumit safetyandefficacyofivermectinanddoxycyclinemonotherapyandincombinationinthetreatmentofcovid19ascopingreview