Cargando…

Respiratory supports of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to describe the respiratory supports and determine their association with clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A systemic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, MedRxiv and BioRxiv database from December 2019 to 2 July 2020....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ouyang, Lichen, Yu, Muqing, Zhu, Yan, Gong, Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06813
_version_ 1783679815903084544
author Ouyang, Lichen
Yu, Muqing
Zhu, Yan
Gong, Jie
author_facet Ouyang, Lichen
Yu, Muqing
Zhu, Yan
Gong, Jie
author_sort Ouyang, Lichen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We aimed to describe the respiratory supports and determine their association with clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A systemic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, MedRxiv and BioRxiv database from December 2019 to 2 July 2020. Studies reporting the application of respiratory supports in COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU were included. RESULTS: Forty studies with 15320 COVID-19 patients were included in this systematic review. The proportion of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) application in ICU patients with COVID-19 was 73.8%. Further analysis elucidated that the use rate of IMV in Asia, Europe and North America was 47%, 76.2% and 80.2%, respectively. The proportion of patients treated with prone positioning and IMV was 29.4%. 25.5% of COVID-19 patients requiring IMV developed ventilator-associated pneumonia. The mortality of patients treated with IMV was 51.1%, while only 17.5% of critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with non-IMV respiratory support died. Additionally, the utilization rate of IMV in non-survival patients was shown 17.26-folds (95%CI 2.89–103.24, p = 0.002) higher than that in survival patients, while the use rate of ECMO was no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight respiratory supports of COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU in different continents. IMV is a life-saving strategy for critically ill COVID-19 patients with ARDS, yet the mortality remains very high.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8051865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80518652021-04-19 Respiratory supports of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: A systematic review Ouyang, Lichen Yu, Muqing Zhu, Yan Gong, Jie Heliyon Research Article INTRODUCTION: We aimed to describe the respiratory supports and determine their association with clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A systemic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, MedRxiv and BioRxiv database from December 2019 to 2 July 2020. Studies reporting the application of respiratory supports in COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU were included. RESULTS: Forty studies with 15320 COVID-19 patients were included in this systematic review. The proportion of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) application in ICU patients with COVID-19 was 73.8%. Further analysis elucidated that the use rate of IMV in Asia, Europe and North America was 47%, 76.2% and 80.2%, respectively. The proportion of patients treated with prone positioning and IMV was 29.4%. 25.5% of COVID-19 patients requiring IMV developed ventilator-associated pneumonia. The mortality of patients treated with IMV was 51.1%, while only 17.5% of critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with non-IMV respiratory support died. Additionally, the utilization rate of IMV in non-survival patients was shown 17.26-folds (95%CI 2.89–103.24, p = 0.002) higher than that in survival patients, while the use rate of ECMO was no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight respiratory supports of COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU in different continents. IMV is a life-saving strategy for critically ill COVID-19 patients with ARDS, yet the mortality remains very high. Elsevier 2021-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8051865/ /pubmed/33898856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06813 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Ouyang, Lichen
Yu, Muqing
Zhu, Yan
Gong, Jie
Respiratory supports of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: A systematic review
title Respiratory supports of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: A systematic review
title_full Respiratory supports of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: A systematic review
title_fullStr Respiratory supports of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Respiratory supports of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: A systematic review
title_short Respiratory supports of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: A systematic review
title_sort respiratory supports of covid-19 patients in intensive care unit: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06813
work_keys_str_mv AT ouyanglichen respiratorysupportsofcovid19patientsinintensivecareunitasystematicreview
AT yumuqing respiratorysupportsofcovid19patientsinintensivecareunitasystematicreview
AT zhuyan respiratorysupportsofcovid19patientsinintensivecareunitasystematicreview
AT gongjie respiratorysupportsofcovid19patientsinintensivecareunitasystematicreview