Cargando…
Respiratory supports of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: A systematic review
INTRODUCTION: We aimed to describe the respiratory supports and determine their association with clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A systemic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, MedRxiv and BioRxiv database from December 2019 to 2 July 2020....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06813 |
_version_ | 1783679815903084544 |
---|---|
author | Ouyang, Lichen Yu, Muqing Zhu, Yan Gong, Jie |
author_facet | Ouyang, Lichen Yu, Muqing Zhu, Yan Gong, Jie |
author_sort | Ouyang, Lichen |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: We aimed to describe the respiratory supports and determine their association with clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A systemic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, MedRxiv and BioRxiv database from December 2019 to 2 July 2020. Studies reporting the application of respiratory supports in COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU were included. RESULTS: Forty studies with 15320 COVID-19 patients were included in this systematic review. The proportion of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) application in ICU patients with COVID-19 was 73.8%. Further analysis elucidated that the use rate of IMV in Asia, Europe and North America was 47%, 76.2% and 80.2%, respectively. The proportion of patients treated with prone positioning and IMV was 29.4%. 25.5% of COVID-19 patients requiring IMV developed ventilator-associated pneumonia. The mortality of patients treated with IMV was 51.1%, while only 17.5% of critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with non-IMV respiratory support died. Additionally, the utilization rate of IMV in non-survival patients was shown 17.26-folds (95%CI 2.89–103.24, p = 0.002) higher than that in survival patients, while the use rate of ECMO was no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight respiratory supports of COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU in different continents. IMV is a life-saving strategy for critically ill COVID-19 patients with ARDS, yet the mortality remains very high. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8051865 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80518652021-04-19 Respiratory supports of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: A systematic review Ouyang, Lichen Yu, Muqing Zhu, Yan Gong, Jie Heliyon Research Article INTRODUCTION: We aimed to describe the respiratory supports and determine their association with clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A systemic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, MedRxiv and BioRxiv database from December 2019 to 2 July 2020. Studies reporting the application of respiratory supports in COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU were included. RESULTS: Forty studies with 15320 COVID-19 patients were included in this systematic review. The proportion of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) application in ICU patients with COVID-19 was 73.8%. Further analysis elucidated that the use rate of IMV in Asia, Europe and North America was 47%, 76.2% and 80.2%, respectively. The proportion of patients treated with prone positioning and IMV was 29.4%. 25.5% of COVID-19 patients requiring IMV developed ventilator-associated pneumonia. The mortality of patients treated with IMV was 51.1%, while only 17.5% of critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with non-IMV respiratory support died. Additionally, the utilization rate of IMV in non-survival patients was shown 17.26-folds (95%CI 2.89–103.24, p = 0.002) higher than that in survival patients, while the use rate of ECMO was no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight respiratory supports of COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU in different continents. IMV is a life-saving strategy for critically ill COVID-19 patients with ARDS, yet the mortality remains very high. Elsevier 2021-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8051865/ /pubmed/33898856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06813 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ouyang, Lichen Yu, Muqing Zhu, Yan Gong, Jie Respiratory supports of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: A systematic review |
title | Respiratory supports of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: A systematic review |
title_full | Respiratory supports of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Respiratory supports of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Respiratory supports of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: A systematic review |
title_short | Respiratory supports of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: A systematic review |
title_sort | respiratory supports of covid-19 patients in intensive care unit: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06813 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ouyanglichen respiratorysupportsofcovid19patientsinintensivecareunitasystematicreview AT yumuqing respiratorysupportsofcovid19patientsinintensivecareunitasystematicreview AT zhuyan respiratorysupportsofcovid19patientsinintensivecareunitasystematicreview AT gongjie respiratorysupportsofcovid19patientsinintensivecareunitasystematicreview |