Cargando…

Frequency following responses and rate change complexes in cochlear implant users

The upper limit of rate-based pitch perception and rate discrimination can differ substantially across cochlear implant (CI) users. One potential reason for this difference is the presence of a biological limitation on temporal encoding in the electrically-stimulated auditory pathway, which can be i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gransier, Robin, Guérit, Franҫois, Carlyon, Robert P., Wouters, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8052190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33647574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2021.108200
_version_ 1783679878050086912
author Gransier, Robin
Guérit, Franҫois
Carlyon, Robert P.
Wouters, Jan
author_facet Gransier, Robin
Guérit, Franҫois
Carlyon, Robert P.
Wouters, Jan
author_sort Gransier, Robin
collection PubMed
description The upper limit of rate-based pitch perception and rate discrimination can differ substantially across cochlear implant (CI) users. One potential reason for this difference is the presence of a biological limitation on temporal encoding in the electrically-stimulated auditory pathway, which can be inherent to the electrical stimulation itself and/or to the degenerative processes associated with hearing loss. Electrophysiological measures, like the electrically-evoked frequency following response (eFFR) and auditory change complex (eACC), could potentially provide valuable insights in the temporal processing limitations at the level of the brainstem and cortex in the electrically-stimulated auditory pathway. Obtaining these neural responses, free from stimulation artifacts, is challenging, especially when the neural response is phase-locked to the stimulation rate, as is the case for the eFFR. In this study we investigated the feasibility of measuring eFFRs, free from stimulation artifacts, to stimulation rates ranging from 94 to 196 pulses per second (pps) and eACCs to pulse rate changes ranging from 36 to 108%, when stimulating in a monopolar configuration. A high-sampling rate EEG system was used to measure the electrophysiological responses in five CI users, and linear interpolation was applied to remove the stimulation artifacts from the EEG. With this approach, we were able to measure eFFRs for pulse rates up to 162 pps and eACCs to the different rate changes. Our results show that it is feasible to measure electrophysiological responses, free from stimulation artifacts, that could potentially be used as neural correlates for rate and pitch processing in CI users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8052190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80521902021-05-01 Frequency following responses and rate change complexes in cochlear implant users Gransier, Robin Guérit, Franҫois Carlyon, Robert P. Wouters, Jan Hear Res Technical Note The upper limit of rate-based pitch perception and rate discrimination can differ substantially across cochlear implant (CI) users. One potential reason for this difference is the presence of a biological limitation on temporal encoding in the electrically-stimulated auditory pathway, which can be inherent to the electrical stimulation itself and/or to the degenerative processes associated with hearing loss. Electrophysiological measures, like the electrically-evoked frequency following response (eFFR) and auditory change complex (eACC), could potentially provide valuable insights in the temporal processing limitations at the level of the brainstem and cortex in the electrically-stimulated auditory pathway. Obtaining these neural responses, free from stimulation artifacts, is challenging, especially when the neural response is phase-locked to the stimulation rate, as is the case for the eFFR. In this study we investigated the feasibility of measuring eFFRs, free from stimulation artifacts, to stimulation rates ranging from 94 to 196 pulses per second (pps) and eACCs to pulse rate changes ranging from 36 to 108%, when stimulating in a monopolar configuration. A high-sampling rate EEG system was used to measure the electrophysiological responses in five CI users, and linear interpolation was applied to remove the stimulation artifacts from the EEG. With this approach, we were able to measure eFFRs for pulse rates up to 162 pps and eACCs to the different rate changes. Our results show that it is feasible to measure electrophysiological responses, free from stimulation artifacts, that could potentially be used as neural correlates for rate and pitch processing in CI users. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8052190/ /pubmed/33647574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2021.108200 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Technical Note
Gransier, Robin
Guérit, Franҫois
Carlyon, Robert P.
Wouters, Jan
Frequency following responses and rate change complexes in cochlear implant users
title Frequency following responses and rate change complexes in cochlear implant users
title_full Frequency following responses and rate change complexes in cochlear implant users
title_fullStr Frequency following responses and rate change complexes in cochlear implant users
title_full_unstemmed Frequency following responses and rate change complexes in cochlear implant users
title_short Frequency following responses and rate change complexes in cochlear implant users
title_sort frequency following responses and rate change complexes in cochlear implant users
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8052190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33647574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2021.108200
work_keys_str_mv AT gransierrobin frequencyfollowingresponsesandratechangecomplexesincochlearimplantusers
AT gueritfranҫois frequencyfollowingresponsesandratechangecomplexesincochlearimplantusers
AT carlyonrobertp frequencyfollowingresponsesandratechangecomplexesincochlearimplantusers
AT woutersjan frequencyfollowingresponsesandratechangecomplexesincochlearimplantusers