Cargando…
A computed tomography cadaveric study of the radiological anatomy of the patella: the size of the patella correlates with bone bridge between tunnels and R angles are introduced for safe tunnel drilling during MPFL reconstruction
PURPOSE: To measure the safe range of angles during tunnel drilling and map ideal patella tunnel placement with the use of preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan and compare results after medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction using a hardware-free patellar fixation technique with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8052390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33864169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00348-9 |
_version_ | 1783679909264097280 |
---|---|
author | Raoulis, Vasileios Tsifountoudis, Ioannis Fyllos, Apostolos Hantes, Michael Malahias, Michael-Alexander Karantanas, Apostolos Zibis, Aristeidis |
author_facet | Raoulis, Vasileios Tsifountoudis, Ioannis Fyllos, Apostolos Hantes, Michael Malahias, Michael-Alexander Karantanas, Apostolos Zibis, Aristeidis |
author_sort | Raoulis, Vasileios |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To measure the safe range of angles during tunnel drilling and map ideal patella tunnel placement with the use of preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan and compare results after medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction using a hardware-free patellar fixation technique with two semi-patellar tunnels between a) a free-hand technique, and b) its modification with the use of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tibia aiming device. METHODS: CT scan was performed on 30 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees a) prior to any intervention and b) after MPFL reconstruction. For MPFL reconstruction, specimens were randomly allocated to 1) Group A, which consisted of knees operated with free-hand, hardware-free patellar fixation technique with two semi-patellar tunnels and 2) Group B, which consisted of knees operated on with a technique modification with the ACL tibia device. PATELLAR MEASUREMENTS: L1 was the maximal patellar length. L2 was the minimum possible distance of placement for the upper tunnel from the proximal pole of the patella. The maximum bone bridge between tunnels was calculated as half of L1 minus the L2 distance (L1/2-L2). We also measured R1 and R2 angles at the proximal and distal tunnel that represent safe angles at the entry point during tunnel drilling (without breaching the anterior cortex or articular cartilage). RESULTS: Preoperatively, mean L1 was 3.45 cm (range 3.05–4.52). Mean L2 was 0.62 cm (range 0.49–0.89). The mean maximum possible bone bridge between tunnels (L1/2-L2) was 1.1 cm (range 0.77–1.58). R1 was 6.05(0) (range 4.78–7.44), R2 was 6.64(0) (range 4.57–9.03), and their difference reached statistical significance (p = 0.03). Postoperatively, in group A, in 4 out of 15 patellas, multiple attempts were made during tunnel drilling in order to avoid anterior cortex or cartilage breaching. In group B, all tunnels were correctly drilled with the first attempt. Bone bridge between tunnels was significantly shorter postoperatively (0.93 cm, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Small-size patellae correlate with short maximum bone bridge between tunnels, which makes anatomic, double-bundle, hardware-free patella fixation, with two semi-patellar tunnels MPFL reconstruction challenging. Furthermore, R angles create a narrow window to avoid intraoperative breaching, rendering the use of the ACL tibia device an extremely useful instrument. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8052390 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80523902021-05-05 A computed tomography cadaveric study of the radiological anatomy of the patella: the size of the patella correlates with bone bridge between tunnels and R angles are introduced for safe tunnel drilling during MPFL reconstruction Raoulis, Vasileios Tsifountoudis, Ioannis Fyllos, Apostolos Hantes, Michael Malahias, Michael-Alexander Karantanas, Apostolos Zibis, Aristeidis J Exp Orthop Original Paper PURPOSE: To measure the safe range of angles during tunnel drilling and map ideal patella tunnel placement with the use of preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan and compare results after medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction using a hardware-free patellar fixation technique with two semi-patellar tunnels between a) a free-hand technique, and b) its modification with the use of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tibia aiming device. METHODS: CT scan was performed on 30 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees a) prior to any intervention and b) after MPFL reconstruction. For MPFL reconstruction, specimens were randomly allocated to 1) Group A, which consisted of knees operated with free-hand, hardware-free patellar fixation technique with two semi-patellar tunnels and 2) Group B, which consisted of knees operated on with a technique modification with the ACL tibia device. PATELLAR MEASUREMENTS: L1 was the maximal patellar length. L2 was the minimum possible distance of placement for the upper tunnel from the proximal pole of the patella. The maximum bone bridge between tunnels was calculated as half of L1 minus the L2 distance (L1/2-L2). We also measured R1 and R2 angles at the proximal and distal tunnel that represent safe angles at the entry point during tunnel drilling (without breaching the anterior cortex or articular cartilage). RESULTS: Preoperatively, mean L1 was 3.45 cm (range 3.05–4.52). Mean L2 was 0.62 cm (range 0.49–0.89). The mean maximum possible bone bridge between tunnels (L1/2-L2) was 1.1 cm (range 0.77–1.58). R1 was 6.05(0) (range 4.78–7.44), R2 was 6.64(0) (range 4.57–9.03), and their difference reached statistical significance (p = 0.03). Postoperatively, in group A, in 4 out of 15 patellas, multiple attempts were made during tunnel drilling in order to avoid anterior cortex or cartilage breaching. In group B, all tunnels were correctly drilled with the first attempt. Bone bridge between tunnels was significantly shorter postoperatively (0.93 cm, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Small-size patellae correlate with short maximum bone bridge between tunnels, which makes anatomic, double-bundle, hardware-free patella fixation, with two semi-patellar tunnels MPFL reconstruction challenging. Furthermore, R angles create a narrow window to avoid intraoperative breaching, rendering the use of the ACL tibia device an extremely useful instrument. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8052390/ /pubmed/33864169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00348-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Raoulis, Vasileios Tsifountoudis, Ioannis Fyllos, Apostolos Hantes, Michael Malahias, Michael-Alexander Karantanas, Apostolos Zibis, Aristeidis A computed tomography cadaveric study of the radiological anatomy of the patella: the size of the patella correlates with bone bridge between tunnels and R angles are introduced for safe tunnel drilling during MPFL reconstruction |
title | A computed tomography cadaveric study of the radiological anatomy of the patella: the size of the patella correlates with bone bridge between tunnels and R angles are introduced for safe tunnel drilling during MPFL reconstruction |
title_full | A computed tomography cadaveric study of the radiological anatomy of the patella: the size of the patella correlates with bone bridge between tunnels and R angles are introduced for safe tunnel drilling during MPFL reconstruction |
title_fullStr | A computed tomography cadaveric study of the radiological anatomy of the patella: the size of the patella correlates with bone bridge between tunnels and R angles are introduced for safe tunnel drilling during MPFL reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | A computed tomography cadaveric study of the radiological anatomy of the patella: the size of the patella correlates with bone bridge between tunnels and R angles are introduced for safe tunnel drilling during MPFL reconstruction |
title_short | A computed tomography cadaveric study of the radiological anatomy of the patella: the size of the patella correlates with bone bridge between tunnels and R angles are introduced for safe tunnel drilling during MPFL reconstruction |
title_sort | computed tomography cadaveric study of the radiological anatomy of the patella: the size of the patella correlates with bone bridge between tunnels and r angles are introduced for safe tunnel drilling during mpfl reconstruction |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8052390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33864169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00348-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raoulisvasileios acomputedtomographycadavericstudyoftheradiologicalanatomyofthepatellathesizeofthepatellacorrelateswithbonebridgebetweentunnelsandranglesareintroducedforsafetunneldrillingduringmpflreconstruction AT tsifountoudisioannis acomputedtomographycadavericstudyoftheradiologicalanatomyofthepatellathesizeofthepatellacorrelateswithbonebridgebetweentunnelsandranglesareintroducedforsafetunneldrillingduringmpflreconstruction AT fyllosapostolos acomputedtomographycadavericstudyoftheradiologicalanatomyofthepatellathesizeofthepatellacorrelateswithbonebridgebetweentunnelsandranglesareintroducedforsafetunneldrillingduringmpflreconstruction AT hantesmichael acomputedtomographycadavericstudyoftheradiologicalanatomyofthepatellathesizeofthepatellacorrelateswithbonebridgebetweentunnelsandranglesareintroducedforsafetunneldrillingduringmpflreconstruction AT malahiasmichaelalexander acomputedtomographycadavericstudyoftheradiologicalanatomyofthepatellathesizeofthepatellacorrelateswithbonebridgebetweentunnelsandranglesareintroducedforsafetunneldrillingduringmpflreconstruction AT karantanasapostolos acomputedtomographycadavericstudyoftheradiologicalanatomyofthepatellathesizeofthepatellacorrelateswithbonebridgebetweentunnelsandranglesareintroducedforsafetunneldrillingduringmpflreconstruction AT zibisaristeidis acomputedtomographycadavericstudyoftheradiologicalanatomyofthepatellathesizeofthepatellacorrelateswithbonebridgebetweentunnelsandranglesareintroducedforsafetunneldrillingduringmpflreconstruction AT raoulisvasileios computedtomographycadavericstudyoftheradiologicalanatomyofthepatellathesizeofthepatellacorrelateswithbonebridgebetweentunnelsandranglesareintroducedforsafetunneldrillingduringmpflreconstruction AT tsifountoudisioannis computedtomographycadavericstudyoftheradiologicalanatomyofthepatellathesizeofthepatellacorrelateswithbonebridgebetweentunnelsandranglesareintroducedforsafetunneldrillingduringmpflreconstruction AT fyllosapostolos computedtomographycadavericstudyoftheradiologicalanatomyofthepatellathesizeofthepatellacorrelateswithbonebridgebetweentunnelsandranglesareintroducedforsafetunneldrillingduringmpflreconstruction AT hantesmichael computedtomographycadavericstudyoftheradiologicalanatomyofthepatellathesizeofthepatellacorrelateswithbonebridgebetweentunnelsandranglesareintroducedforsafetunneldrillingduringmpflreconstruction AT malahiasmichaelalexander computedtomographycadavericstudyoftheradiologicalanatomyofthepatellathesizeofthepatellacorrelateswithbonebridgebetweentunnelsandranglesareintroducedforsafetunneldrillingduringmpflreconstruction AT karantanasapostolos computedtomographycadavericstudyoftheradiologicalanatomyofthepatellathesizeofthepatellacorrelateswithbonebridgebetweentunnelsandranglesareintroducedforsafetunneldrillingduringmpflreconstruction AT zibisaristeidis computedtomographycadavericstudyoftheradiologicalanatomyofthepatellathesizeofthepatellacorrelateswithbonebridgebetweentunnelsandranglesareintroducedforsafetunneldrillingduringmpflreconstruction |