Cargando…

The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence

BACKGROUND: Investigations of transparency, reproducibility and replicability in science have been directed largely at individual studies. It is just as critical to explore these issues in syntheses of studies, such as systematic reviews, given their influence on decision-making and future research....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Page, Matthew J., Moher, David, Fidler, Fiona M., Higgins, Julian P. T., Brennan, Sue E., Haddaway, Neal R., Hamilton, Daniel G., Kanukula, Raju, Karunananthan, Sathya, Maxwell, Lara J., McDonald, Steve, Nakagawa, Shinichi, Nunan, David, Tugwell, Peter, Welch, Vivian A., McKenzie, Joanne E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8052676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33863381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01670-0
_version_ 1783679970526101504
author Page, Matthew J.
Moher, David
Fidler, Fiona M.
Higgins, Julian P. T.
Brennan, Sue E.
Haddaway, Neal R.
Hamilton, Daniel G.
Kanukula, Raju
Karunananthan, Sathya
Maxwell, Lara J.
McDonald, Steve
Nakagawa, Shinichi
Nunan, David
Tugwell, Peter
Welch, Vivian A.
McKenzie, Joanne E.
author_facet Page, Matthew J.
Moher, David
Fidler, Fiona M.
Higgins, Julian P. T.
Brennan, Sue E.
Haddaway, Neal R.
Hamilton, Daniel G.
Kanukula, Raju
Karunananthan, Sathya
Maxwell, Lara J.
McDonald, Steve
Nakagawa, Shinichi
Nunan, David
Tugwell, Peter
Welch, Vivian A.
McKenzie, Joanne E.
author_sort Page, Matthew J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Investigations of transparency, reproducibility and replicability in science have been directed largely at individual studies. It is just as critical to explore these issues in syntheses of studies, such as systematic reviews, given their influence on decision-making and future research. We aim to explore various aspects relating to the transparency, reproducibility and replicability of several components of systematic reviews with meta-analysis of the effects of health, social, behavioural and educational interventions. METHODS: The REPRISE (REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence) project consists of four studies. We will evaluate the completeness of reporting and sharing of review data, analytic code and other materials in a random sample of 300 systematic reviews of interventions published in 2020 (Study 1). We will survey authors of systematic reviews to explore their views on sharing review data, analytic code and other materials and their understanding of and opinions about replication of systematic reviews (Study 2). We will then evaluate the extent of variation in results when we (a) independently reproduce meta-analyses using the same computational steps and analytic code (if available) as used in the original review (Study 3), and (b) crowdsource teams of systematic reviewers to independently replicate a subset of methods (searches for studies, selection of studies for inclusion, collection of outcome data, and synthesis of results) in a sample of the original reviews; 30 reviews will be replicated by 1 team each and 2 reviews will be replicated by 15 teams (Study 4). DISCUSSION: The REPRISE project takes a systematic approach to determine how reliable systematic reviews of interventions are. We anticipate that results of the REPRISE project will inform strategies to improve the conduct and reporting of future systematic reviews. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01670-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8052676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80526762021-04-19 The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence Page, Matthew J. Moher, David Fidler, Fiona M. Higgins, Julian P. T. Brennan, Sue E. Haddaway, Neal R. Hamilton, Daniel G. Kanukula, Raju Karunananthan, Sathya Maxwell, Lara J. McDonald, Steve Nakagawa, Shinichi Nunan, David Tugwell, Peter Welch, Vivian A. McKenzie, Joanne E. Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Investigations of transparency, reproducibility and replicability in science have been directed largely at individual studies. It is just as critical to explore these issues in syntheses of studies, such as systematic reviews, given their influence on decision-making and future research. We aim to explore various aspects relating to the transparency, reproducibility and replicability of several components of systematic reviews with meta-analysis of the effects of health, social, behavioural and educational interventions. METHODS: The REPRISE (REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence) project consists of four studies. We will evaluate the completeness of reporting and sharing of review data, analytic code and other materials in a random sample of 300 systematic reviews of interventions published in 2020 (Study 1). We will survey authors of systematic reviews to explore their views on sharing review data, analytic code and other materials and their understanding of and opinions about replication of systematic reviews (Study 2). We will then evaluate the extent of variation in results when we (a) independently reproduce meta-analyses using the same computational steps and analytic code (if available) as used in the original review (Study 3), and (b) crowdsource teams of systematic reviewers to independently replicate a subset of methods (searches for studies, selection of studies for inclusion, collection of outcome data, and synthesis of results) in a sample of the original reviews; 30 reviews will be replicated by 1 team each and 2 reviews will be replicated by 15 teams (Study 4). DISCUSSION: The REPRISE project takes a systematic approach to determine how reliable systematic reviews of interventions are. We anticipate that results of the REPRISE project will inform strategies to improve the conduct and reporting of future systematic reviews. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01670-0. BioMed Central 2021-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8052676/ /pubmed/33863381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01670-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Protocol
Page, Matthew J.
Moher, David
Fidler, Fiona M.
Higgins, Julian P. T.
Brennan, Sue E.
Haddaway, Neal R.
Hamilton, Daniel G.
Kanukula, Raju
Karunananthan, Sathya
Maxwell, Lara J.
McDonald, Steve
Nakagawa, Shinichi
Nunan, David
Tugwell, Peter
Welch, Vivian A.
McKenzie, Joanne E.
The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence
title The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence
title_full The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence
title_fullStr The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence
title_full_unstemmed The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence
title_short The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence
title_sort reprise project: protocol for an evaluation of reproducibility and replicability in syntheses of evidence
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8052676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33863381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01670-0
work_keys_str_mv AT pagematthewj therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT moherdavid therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT fidlerfionam therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT higginsjulianpt therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT brennansuee therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT haddawaynealr therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT hamiltondanielg therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT kanukularaju therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT karunananthansathya therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT maxwelllaraj therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT mcdonaldsteve therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT nakagawashinichi therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT nunandavid therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT tugwellpeter therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT welchviviana therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT mckenziejoannee therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT pagematthewj repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT moherdavid repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT fidlerfionam repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT higginsjulianpt repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT brennansuee repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT haddawaynealr repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT hamiltondanielg repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT kanukularaju repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT karunananthansathya repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT maxwelllaraj repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT mcdonaldsteve repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT nakagawashinichi repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT nunandavid repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT tugwellpeter repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT welchviviana repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence
AT mckenziejoannee repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence