Cargando…
The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence
BACKGROUND: Investigations of transparency, reproducibility and replicability in science have been directed largely at individual studies. It is just as critical to explore these issues in syntheses of studies, such as systematic reviews, given their influence on decision-making and future research....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8052676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33863381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01670-0 |
_version_ | 1783679970526101504 |
---|---|
author | Page, Matthew J. Moher, David Fidler, Fiona M. Higgins, Julian P. T. Brennan, Sue E. Haddaway, Neal R. Hamilton, Daniel G. Kanukula, Raju Karunananthan, Sathya Maxwell, Lara J. McDonald, Steve Nakagawa, Shinichi Nunan, David Tugwell, Peter Welch, Vivian A. McKenzie, Joanne E. |
author_facet | Page, Matthew J. Moher, David Fidler, Fiona M. Higgins, Julian P. T. Brennan, Sue E. Haddaway, Neal R. Hamilton, Daniel G. Kanukula, Raju Karunananthan, Sathya Maxwell, Lara J. McDonald, Steve Nakagawa, Shinichi Nunan, David Tugwell, Peter Welch, Vivian A. McKenzie, Joanne E. |
author_sort | Page, Matthew J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Investigations of transparency, reproducibility and replicability in science have been directed largely at individual studies. It is just as critical to explore these issues in syntheses of studies, such as systematic reviews, given their influence on decision-making and future research. We aim to explore various aspects relating to the transparency, reproducibility and replicability of several components of systematic reviews with meta-analysis of the effects of health, social, behavioural and educational interventions. METHODS: The REPRISE (REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence) project consists of four studies. We will evaluate the completeness of reporting and sharing of review data, analytic code and other materials in a random sample of 300 systematic reviews of interventions published in 2020 (Study 1). We will survey authors of systematic reviews to explore their views on sharing review data, analytic code and other materials and their understanding of and opinions about replication of systematic reviews (Study 2). We will then evaluate the extent of variation in results when we (a) independently reproduce meta-analyses using the same computational steps and analytic code (if available) as used in the original review (Study 3), and (b) crowdsource teams of systematic reviewers to independently replicate a subset of methods (searches for studies, selection of studies for inclusion, collection of outcome data, and synthesis of results) in a sample of the original reviews; 30 reviews will be replicated by 1 team each and 2 reviews will be replicated by 15 teams (Study 4). DISCUSSION: The REPRISE project takes a systematic approach to determine how reliable systematic reviews of interventions are. We anticipate that results of the REPRISE project will inform strategies to improve the conduct and reporting of future systematic reviews. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01670-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8052676 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80526762021-04-19 The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence Page, Matthew J. Moher, David Fidler, Fiona M. Higgins, Julian P. T. Brennan, Sue E. Haddaway, Neal R. Hamilton, Daniel G. Kanukula, Raju Karunananthan, Sathya Maxwell, Lara J. McDonald, Steve Nakagawa, Shinichi Nunan, David Tugwell, Peter Welch, Vivian A. McKenzie, Joanne E. Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Investigations of transparency, reproducibility and replicability in science have been directed largely at individual studies. It is just as critical to explore these issues in syntheses of studies, such as systematic reviews, given their influence on decision-making and future research. We aim to explore various aspects relating to the transparency, reproducibility and replicability of several components of systematic reviews with meta-analysis of the effects of health, social, behavioural and educational interventions. METHODS: The REPRISE (REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence) project consists of four studies. We will evaluate the completeness of reporting and sharing of review data, analytic code and other materials in a random sample of 300 systematic reviews of interventions published in 2020 (Study 1). We will survey authors of systematic reviews to explore their views on sharing review data, analytic code and other materials and their understanding of and opinions about replication of systematic reviews (Study 2). We will then evaluate the extent of variation in results when we (a) independently reproduce meta-analyses using the same computational steps and analytic code (if available) as used in the original review (Study 3), and (b) crowdsource teams of systematic reviewers to independently replicate a subset of methods (searches for studies, selection of studies for inclusion, collection of outcome data, and synthesis of results) in a sample of the original reviews; 30 reviews will be replicated by 1 team each and 2 reviews will be replicated by 15 teams (Study 4). DISCUSSION: The REPRISE project takes a systematic approach to determine how reliable systematic reviews of interventions are. We anticipate that results of the REPRISE project will inform strategies to improve the conduct and reporting of future systematic reviews. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01670-0. BioMed Central 2021-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8052676/ /pubmed/33863381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01670-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Page, Matthew J. Moher, David Fidler, Fiona M. Higgins, Julian P. T. Brennan, Sue E. Haddaway, Neal R. Hamilton, Daniel G. Kanukula, Raju Karunananthan, Sathya Maxwell, Lara J. McDonald, Steve Nakagawa, Shinichi Nunan, David Tugwell, Peter Welch, Vivian A. McKenzie, Joanne E. The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence |
title | The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence |
title_full | The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence |
title_fullStr | The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence |
title_short | The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence |
title_sort | reprise project: protocol for an evaluation of reproducibility and replicability in syntheses of evidence |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8052676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33863381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01670-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pagematthewj therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT moherdavid therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT fidlerfionam therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT higginsjulianpt therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT brennansuee therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT haddawaynealr therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT hamiltondanielg therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT kanukularaju therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT karunananthansathya therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT maxwelllaraj therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT mcdonaldsteve therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT nakagawashinichi therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT nunandavid therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT tugwellpeter therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT welchviviana therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT mckenziejoannee therepriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT pagematthewj repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT moherdavid repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT fidlerfionam repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT higginsjulianpt repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT brennansuee repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT haddawaynealr repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT hamiltondanielg repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT kanukularaju repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT karunananthansathya repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT maxwelllaraj repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT mcdonaldsteve repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT nakagawashinichi repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT nunandavid repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT tugwellpeter repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT welchviviana repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence AT mckenziejoannee repriseprojectprotocolforanevaluationofreproducibilityandreplicabilityinsynthesesofevidence |