Cargando…
The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence
BACKGROUND: Investigations of transparency, reproducibility and replicability in science have been directed largely at individual studies. It is just as critical to explore these issues in syntheses of studies, such as systematic reviews, given their influence on decision-making and future research....
Autores principales: | Page, Matthew J., Moher, David, Fidler, Fiona M., Higgins, Julian P. T., Brennan, Sue E., Haddaway, Neal R., Hamilton, Daniel G., Kanukula, Raju, Karunananthan, Sathya, Maxwell, Lara J., McDonald, Steve, Nakagawa, Shinichi, Nunan, David, Tugwell, Peter, Welch, Vivian A., McKenzie, Joanne E. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8052676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33863381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01670-0 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Changing patterns in reporting and sharing of review data in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of the effects of interventions: cross sectional meta-research study
por: Nguyen, Phi-Yen, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
“One more time”: why replicating some syntheses of evidence relevant to COVID-19 makes sense
por: Page, Matthew J., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
When is systematic review replication useful, and when is it wasteful?
por: Karunananthan, Sathya, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Testing reprise
por: Watt, J.
Publicado: (2020) -
Regeneration review reprise
por: Whited, Jessica L, et al.
Publicado: (2010)