Cargando…
Setting up a rapid diagnostic clinic for patients with vague symptoms of cancer: a mixed method process evaluation study
BACKGROUND: The study sought to evaluate the impact of a Rapid Diagnostic Clinic (RDC) service designed to improve general practitioner (GP) referral processes for patients who do not meet existing referral criteria yet present with vague - but potentially concerning - symptoms of cancer. We sought...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8052708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33865373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06360-0 |
_version_ | 1783679977102770176 |
---|---|
author | Vasilakis, Christos Forte, Paul |
author_facet | Vasilakis, Christos Forte, Paul |
author_sort | Vasilakis, Christos |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The study sought to evaluate the impact of a Rapid Diagnostic Clinic (RDC) service designed to improve general practitioner (GP) referral processes for patients who do not meet existing referral criteria yet present with vague - but potentially concerning - symptoms of cancer. We sought to investigate how well the RDC has performed in the views of local GPs and patients, and through analysis of its activity and performance in the first two years of operation. METHODS: The study setting was a single, hospital-based RDC clinic in a University Health Board in South Wales. We used a mixed-method process evaluation study, including routinely collected activity and diagnosis data. All GPs were invited to participate in an online survey (34/165 responded), and a smaller group (n = 8) were interviewed individually. Two focus groups with patients and their carers (n = 7) provided in-depth personal accounts of their experiences. RESULTS: The focus groups revealed high rates of patient satisfaction with the RDC. GPs were also overwhelmingly positive about the value of the RDC to their practice. There were 574 clinic attendances between July 2017 and March 2019; the mean age of attendees was 68, 57% were female, and approximately 30% had three or more vague symptoms. Of those attending, we estimated between 42 to 71 (7.3 and 12.3%) received preliminary cancer diagnoses. Median time from GP referral to RDC appointment was 12 days; from GP referral to cancer diagnosis was 34 days. Overall, 73% of RDC patients received either a new diagnosis (suspected cancer 23.2%, non-cancer 35.9%) or an onward referral to secondary care for further investigation with no new diagnosis (13.9%), and 27% were referred to primary care with no new diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The RDC appears to enable a good patient experience in cancer diagnosis. Patients are seen in timely fashion, and the service is highly regarded by them, their carers, and referring GPs. Although too early to draw conclusions about long-term patient outcomes, there are strong indications to suggest that this model of service provision can set higher standards for a strongly patient-centred service. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06360-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8052708 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80527082021-04-19 Setting up a rapid diagnostic clinic for patients with vague symptoms of cancer: a mixed method process evaluation study Vasilakis, Christos Forte, Paul BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The study sought to evaluate the impact of a Rapid Diagnostic Clinic (RDC) service designed to improve general practitioner (GP) referral processes for patients who do not meet existing referral criteria yet present with vague - but potentially concerning - symptoms of cancer. We sought to investigate how well the RDC has performed in the views of local GPs and patients, and through analysis of its activity and performance in the first two years of operation. METHODS: The study setting was a single, hospital-based RDC clinic in a University Health Board in South Wales. We used a mixed-method process evaluation study, including routinely collected activity and diagnosis data. All GPs were invited to participate in an online survey (34/165 responded), and a smaller group (n = 8) were interviewed individually. Two focus groups with patients and their carers (n = 7) provided in-depth personal accounts of their experiences. RESULTS: The focus groups revealed high rates of patient satisfaction with the RDC. GPs were also overwhelmingly positive about the value of the RDC to their practice. There were 574 clinic attendances between July 2017 and March 2019; the mean age of attendees was 68, 57% were female, and approximately 30% had three or more vague symptoms. Of those attending, we estimated between 42 to 71 (7.3 and 12.3%) received preliminary cancer diagnoses. Median time from GP referral to RDC appointment was 12 days; from GP referral to cancer diagnosis was 34 days. Overall, 73% of RDC patients received either a new diagnosis (suspected cancer 23.2%, non-cancer 35.9%) or an onward referral to secondary care for further investigation with no new diagnosis (13.9%), and 27% were referred to primary care with no new diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The RDC appears to enable a good patient experience in cancer diagnosis. Patients are seen in timely fashion, and the service is highly regarded by them, their carers, and referring GPs. Although too early to draw conclusions about long-term patient outcomes, there are strong indications to suggest that this model of service provision can set higher standards for a strongly patient-centred service. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06360-0. BioMed Central 2021-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8052708/ /pubmed/33865373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06360-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vasilakis, Christos Forte, Paul Setting up a rapid diagnostic clinic for patients with vague symptoms of cancer: a mixed method process evaluation study |
title | Setting up a rapid diagnostic clinic for patients with vague symptoms of cancer: a mixed method process evaluation study |
title_full | Setting up a rapid diagnostic clinic for patients with vague symptoms of cancer: a mixed method process evaluation study |
title_fullStr | Setting up a rapid diagnostic clinic for patients with vague symptoms of cancer: a mixed method process evaluation study |
title_full_unstemmed | Setting up a rapid diagnostic clinic for patients with vague symptoms of cancer: a mixed method process evaluation study |
title_short | Setting up a rapid diagnostic clinic for patients with vague symptoms of cancer: a mixed method process evaluation study |
title_sort | setting up a rapid diagnostic clinic for patients with vague symptoms of cancer: a mixed method process evaluation study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8052708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33865373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06360-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vasilakischristos settinguparapiddiagnosticclinicforpatientswithvaguesymptomsofcanceramixedmethodprocessevaluationstudy AT fortepaul settinguparapiddiagnosticclinicforpatientswithvaguesymptomsofcanceramixedmethodprocessevaluationstudy |