Cargando…

3D-printed individualized tooth-borne tissue retraction devices compared to conventional dental splints for head and neck cancer radiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Despite modern treatment techniques, radiotherapy (RT) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) may be associated with high rates of acute and late treatment-related toxicity. The most effective approach to reduce sequelae after RT is to avoid as best as possible healthy tissues and o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Held, Thomas, Herpel, Christopher, Schwindling, Franz Sebastian, Christ, Leo, Lang, Kristin, Regnery, Sebastian, Eichkorn, Tanja, Hommertgen, Adriane, Jaekel, Cornelia, Krisam, Johannes, Moratin, Julius, Mrosek, Jan, Metzger, Karl, Zaoui, Karim, Moutsis, Tracy, Harrabi, Semi, Herfarth, Klaus, Freudlsperger, Christian, Rammelsberg, Peter, Debus, Jürgen, Adeberg, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8052727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33865401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01803-8
_version_ 1783679980960481280
author Held, Thomas
Herpel, Christopher
Schwindling, Franz Sebastian
Christ, Leo
Lang, Kristin
Regnery, Sebastian
Eichkorn, Tanja
Hommertgen, Adriane
Jaekel, Cornelia
Krisam, Johannes
Moratin, Julius
Mrosek, Jan
Metzger, Karl
Zaoui, Karim
Moutsis, Tracy
Harrabi, Semi
Herfarth, Klaus
Freudlsperger, Christian
Rammelsberg, Peter
Debus, Jürgen
Adeberg, Sebastian
author_facet Held, Thomas
Herpel, Christopher
Schwindling, Franz Sebastian
Christ, Leo
Lang, Kristin
Regnery, Sebastian
Eichkorn, Tanja
Hommertgen, Adriane
Jaekel, Cornelia
Krisam, Johannes
Moratin, Julius
Mrosek, Jan
Metzger, Karl
Zaoui, Karim
Moutsis, Tracy
Harrabi, Semi
Herfarth, Klaus
Freudlsperger, Christian
Rammelsberg, Peter
Debus, Jürgen
Adeberg, Sebastian
author_sort Held, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite modern treatment techniques, radiotherapy (RT) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) may be associated with high rates of acute and late treatment-related toxicity. The most effective approach to reduce sequelae after RT is to avoid as best as possible healthy tissues and organs at risk from the radiation target volume. Even small geometric changes can lead to a significant dose reduction in normal tissue and better treatment tolerability. The major objective of the current study is to investigate 3D printed, tooth-borne tissue retraction devices (TRDs) compared to conventional dental splints for head and neck RT. METHODS: In the current two-arm randomized controlled phase II trial, a maximum of 34 patients with HNC will be enrolled. Patients will receive either TRDs or conventional dental splints (randomization ratio 1:1) for the RT. The definition of the target volume, modality, total dose, fractionation, and imaging guidance is not study-specific. The primary endpoint of the study is the rate of acute radiation-induced oral mucositis after RT. The quality of life, local control and overall survival 12 months after RT are the secondary endpoints. Also, patient-reported outcomes and dental status, as well as RT plan comparisons and robustness analyzes, will be assessed as exploratory endpoints. Finally, mesenchymal stem cells, derived from the patients’ gingiva, will be tested in vitro for regenerative and radioprotective properties. DISCUSSION: The preliminary clinical application of TRD showed a high potential for reducing acute and late toxicity of RT in patients with HNC. The current randomized study is the first to prospectively investigate the clinical tolerability and efficacy of TRDs for radiation treatment of head and neck tumors. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04454697; July 1(st) 2020; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT04454697.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8052727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80527272021-04-19 3D-printed individualized tooth-borne tissue retraction devices compared to conventional dental splints for head and neck cancer radiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial Held, Thomas Herpel, Christopher Schwindling, Franz Sebastian Christ, Leo Lang, Kristin Regnery, Sebastian Eichkorn, Tanja Hommertgen, Adriane Jaekel, Cornelia Krisam, Johannes Moratin, Julius Mrosek, Jan Metzger, Karl Zaoui, Karim Moutsis, Tracy Harrabi, Semi Herfarth, Klaus Freudlsperger, Christian Rammelsberg, Peter Debus, Jürgen Adeberg, Sebastian Radiat Oncol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Despite modern treatment techniques, radiotherapy (RT) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) may be associated with high rates of acute and late treatment-related toxicity. The most effective approach to reduce sequelae after RT is to avoid as best as possible healthy tissues and organs at risk from the radiation target volume. Even small geometric changes can lead to a significant dose reduction in normal tissue and better treatment tolerability. The major objective of the current study is to investigate 3D printed, tooth-borne tissue retraction devices (TRDs) compared to conventional dental splints for head and neck RT. METHODS: In the current two-arm randomized controlled phase II trial, a maximum of 34 patients with HNC will be enrolled. Patients will receive either TRDs or conventional dental splints (randomization ratio 1:1) for the RT. The definition of the target volume, modality, total dose, fractionation, and imaging guidance is not study-specific. The primary endpoint of the study is the rate of acute radiation-induced oral mucositis after RT. The quality of life, local control and overall survival 12 months after RT are the secondary endpoints. Also, patient-reported outcomes and dental status, as well as RT plan comparisons and robustness analyzes, will be assessed as exploratory endpoints. Finally, mesenchymal stem cells, derived from the patients’ gingiva, will be tested in vitro for regenerative and radioprotective properties. DISCUSSION: The preliminary clinical application of TRD showed a high potential for reducing acute and late toxicity of RT in patients with HNC. The current randomized study is the first to prospectively investigate the clinical tolerability and efficacy of TRDs for radiation treatment of head and neck tumors. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04454697; July 1(st) 2020; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT04454697. BioMed Central 2021-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8052727/ /pubmed/33865401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01803-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Held, Thomas
Herpel, Christopher
Schwindling, Franz Sebastian
Christ, Leo
Lang, Kristin
Regnery, Sebastian
Eichkorn, Tanja
Hommertgen, Adriane
Jaekel, Cornelia
Krisam, Johannes
Moratin, Julius
Mrosek, Jan
Metzger, Karl
Zaoui, Karim
Moutsis, Tracy
Harrabi, Semi
Herfarth, Klaus
Freudlsperger, Christian
Rammelsberg, Peter
Debus, Jürgen
Adeberg, Sebastian
3D-printed individualized tooth-borne tissue retraction devices compared to conventional dental splints for head and neck cancer radiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial
title 3D-printed individualized tooth-borne tissue retraction devices compared to conventional dental splints for head and neck cancer radiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial
title_full 3D-printed individualized tooth-borne tissue retraction devices compared to conventional dental splints for head and neck cancer radiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr 3D-printed individualized tooth-borne tissue retraction devices compared to conventional dental splints for head and neck cancer radiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed 3D-printed individualized tooth-borne tissue retraction devices compared to conventional dental splints for head and neck cancer radiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial
title_short 3D-printed individualized tooth-borne tissue retraction devices compared to conventional dental splints for head and neck cancer radiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort 3d-printed individualized tooth-borne tissue retraction devices compared to conventional dental splints for head and neck cancer radiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8052727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33865401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01803-8
work_keys_str_mv AT heldthomas 3dprintedindividualizedtoothbornetissueretractiondevicescomparedtoconventionaldentalsplintsforheadandneckcancerradiotherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT herpelchristopher 3dprintedindividualizedtoothbornetissueretractiondevicescomparedtoconventionaldentalsplintsforheadandneckcancerradiotherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schwindlingfranzsebastian 3dprintedindividualizedtoothbornetissueretractiondevicescomparedtoconventionaldentalsplintsforheadandneckcancerradiotherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT christleo 3dprintedindividualizedtoothbornetissueretractiondevicescomparedtoconventionaldentalsplintsforheadandneckcancerradiotherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT langkristin 3dprintedindividualizedtoothbornetissueretractiondevicescomparedtoconventionaldentalsplintsforheadandneckcancerradiotherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT regnerysebastian 3dprintedindividualizedtoothbornetissueretractiondevicescomparedtoconventionaldentalsplintsforheadandneckcancerradiotherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT eichkorntanja 3dprintedindividualizedtoothbornetissueretractiondevicescomparedtoconventionaldentalsplintsforheadandneckcancerradiotherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hommertgenadriane 3dprintedindividualizedtoothbornetissueretractiondevicescomparedtoconventionaldentalsplintsforheadandneckcancerradiotherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jaekelcornelia 3dprintedindividualizedtoothbornetissueretractiondevicescomparedtoconventionaldentalsplintsforheadandneckcancerradiotherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT krisamjohannes 3dprintedindividualizedtoothbornetissueretractiondevicescomparedtoconventionaldentalsplintsforheadandneckcancerradiotherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT moratinjulius 3dprintedindividualizedtoothbornetissueretractiondevicescomparedtoconventionaldentalsplintsforheadandneckcancerradiotherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mrosekjan 3dprintedindividualizedtoothbornetissueretractiondevicescomparedtoconventionaldentalsplintsforheadandneckcancerradiotherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT metzgerkarl 3dprintedindividualizedtoothbornetissueretractiondevicescomparedtoconventionaldentalsplintsforheadandneckcancerradiotherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zaouikarim 3dprintedindividualizedtoothbornetissueretractiondevicescomparedtoconventionaldentalsplintsforheadandneckcancerradiotherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT moutsistracy 3dprintedindividualizedtoothbornetissueretractiondevicescomparedtoconventionaldentalsplintsforheadandneckcancerradiotherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT harrabisemi 3dprintedindividualizedtoothbornetissueretractiondevicescomparedtoconventionaldentalsplintsforheadandneckcancerradiotherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT herfarthklaus 3dprintedindividualizedtoothbornetissueretractiondevicescomparedtoconventionaldentalsplintsforheadandneckcancerradiotherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT freudlspergerchristian 3dprintedindividualizedtoothbornetissueretractiondevicescomparedtoconventionaldentalsplintsforheadandneckcancerradiotherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rammelsbergpeter 3dprintedindividualizedtoothbornetissueretractiondevicescomparedtoconventionaldentalsplintsforheadandneckcancerradiotherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT debusjurgen 3dprintedindividualizedtoothbornetissueretractiondevicescomparedtoconventionaldentalsplintsforheadandneckcancerradiotherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT adebergsebastian 3dprintedindividualizedtoothbornetissueretractiondevicescomparedtoconventionaldentalsplintsforheadandneckcancerradiotherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial