Cargando…
Overcontrolled, undercontrolled, and resilient personality styles among patients with eating disorders
BACKGROUND: Personality has been suggested to be an important factor in understanding onset, maintenance, and recovery from eating disorders (ED). The objective of the current study was to evaluate personality style in different ED diagnostic groups as classified in the Diagnostic and Statistical Ma...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8052746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33863394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-021-00400-0 |
_version_ | 1783679985472503808 |
---|---|
author | Isaksson, Martina Ghaderi, Ata Wolf-Arehult, Martina Ramklint, Mia |
author_facet | Isaksson, Martina Ghaderi, Ata Wolf-Arehult, Martina Ramklint, Mia |
author_sort | Isaksson, Martina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Personality has been suggested to be an important factor in understanding onset, maintenance, and recovery from eating disorders (ED). The objective of the current study was to evaluate personality style in different ED diagnostic groups as classified in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth edition (DSM-5). METHODS: The overcontrolled, undercontrolled, and resilient personality styles were compared in four groups of patients with EDs: anorexia nervosa restricting (ANr) (n = 34), anorexia nervosa binge eating/purging (ANbp) (n = 31), atypical anorexia nervosa (AAN) (n = 29), and bulimia nervosa (BN) (n = 76). These groups were compared with a group of patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) (n = 108), and a non-clinical group (NC) (n = 444). Patient data were collected at two outpatient clinics in Uppsala, Sweden. NC control data were collected through convenience sampling. Participants filled out questionnaires assessing personality style. RESULTS: The main findings were more pronounced overcontrol reported by the ANr and AAN groups compared with the BN, BPD, and NC groups, and no significant difference in resilience between the ED and the NC groups. Considerable variability of over- and undercontrol was also found within each group. CONCLUSIONS: The results replicate previous findings when EDs are classified according to current diagnostic criteria (DSM-5). Taking personality styles into account may improve our understanding of certain characteristics in EDs, such as social deficits and rigidity that are attributed to poor treatment outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8052746 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80527462021-04-19 Overcontrolled, undercontrolled, and resilient personality styles among patients with eating disorders Isaksson, Martina Ghaderi, Ata Wolf-Arehult, Martina Ramklint, Mia J Eat Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Personality has been suggested to be an important factor in understanding onset, maintenance, and recovery from eating disorders (ED). The objective of the current study was to evaluate personality style in different ED diagnostic groups as classified in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth edition (DSM-5). METHODS: The overcontrolled, undercontrolled, and resilient personality styles were compared in four groups of patients with EDs: anorexia nervosa restricting (ANr) (n = 34), anorexia nervosa binge eating/purging (ANbp) (n = 31), atypical anorexia nervosa (AAN) (n = 29), and bulimia nervosa (BN) (n = 76). These groups were compared with a group of patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) (n = 108), and a non-clinical group (NC) (n = 444). Patient data were collected at two outpatient clinics in Uppsala, Sweden. NC control data were collected through convenience sampling. Participants filled out questionnaires assessing personality style. RESULTS: The main findings were more pronounced overcontrol reported by the ANr and AAN groups compared with the BN, BPD, and NC groups, and no significant difference in resilience between the ED and the NC groups. Considerable variability of over- and undercontrol was also found within each group. CONCLUSIONS: The results replicate previous findings when EDs are classified according to current diagnostic criteria (DSM-5). Taking personality styles into account may improve our understanding of certain characteristics in EDs, such as social deficits and rigidity that are attributed to poor treatment outcome. BioMed Central 2021-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8052746/ /pubmed/33863394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-021-00400-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Isaksson, Martina Ghaderi, Ata Wolf-Arehult, Martina Ramklint, Mia Overcontrolled, undercontrolled, and resilient personality styles among patients with eating disorders |
title | Overcontrolled, undercontrolled, and resilient personality styles among patients with eating disorders |
title_full | Overcontrolled, undercontrolled, and resilient personality styles among patients with eating disorders |
title_fullStr | Overcontrolled, undercontrolled, and resilient personality styles among patients with eating disorders |
title_full_unstemmed | Overcontrolled, undercontrolled, and resilient personality styles among patients with eating disorders |
title_short | Overcontrolled, undercontrolled, and resilient personality styles among patients with eating disorders |
title_sort | overcontrolled, undercontrolled, and resilient personality styles among patients with eating disorders |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8052746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33863394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-021-00400-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT isakssonmartina overcontrolledundercontrolledandresilientpersonalitystylesamongpatientswitheatingdisorders AT ghaderiata overcontrolledundercontrolledandresilientpersonalitystylesamongpatientswitheatingdisorders AT wolfarehultmartina overcontrolledundercontrolledandresilientpersonalitystylesamongpatientswitheatingdisorders AT ramklintmia overcontrolledundercontrolledandresilientpersonalitystylesamongpatientswitheatingdisorders |