Cargando…
The assembly effect: the connectedness between populations is a double‐edged sword for public health interventions
BACKGROUND: Many public health interventions lead to disruption or decrease of transmission, providing a beneficial effect for people in the population regardless of whether or not they individually participate in the intervention. This protective benefit has been referred to as a herd or community...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8052750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33865392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03726-x |
_version_ | 1783679986395250688 |
---|---|
author | Tun, Sai Thein Than Parker, Daniel M. Aguas, Ricardo White, Lisa J. |
author_facet | Tun, Sai Thein Than Parker, Daniel M. Aguas, Ricardo White, Lisa J. |
author_sort | Tun, Sai Thein Than |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Many public health interventions lead to disruption or decrease of transmission, providing a beneficial effect for people in the population regardless of whether or not they individually participate in the intervention. This protective benefit has been referred to as a herd or community effect and is dependent on sufficient population participation. In practice, public health interventions are implemented at different spatial scales (i.e., at the village, district, or provincial level). Populations, however defined (i.e., neighbourhoods, villages, districts) are frequently connected to other populations through human movement or travel, and this connectedness can influence potential herd effects. METHODS: The impact of a public health intervention (mass drug administration for malaria) was modelled, for different levels of connectedness between populations that have similar disease epidemiology (e.g., two nearby villages which have similar baseline malaria incidences and similar malaria intervention measures), or between populations of varying disease epidemiology (e.g., two nearby villages which have different baseline malaria incidences and/or malaria intervention measures). RESULTS: The overall impact of the interventions deployed could be influenced either positively (adding value to the intervention) or negatively (reducing the impact of the intervention) by how much the intervention units are connected with each other (e.g., how frequent people go to the other village or town) and how different the disease intensity between them are. This phenomenon is termed the “assembly effect”, and it is a meta-population version of the more commonly understood “herd effect”. CONCLUSIONS: The connectedness of intervention units or populations is an important factor to be considered to achieve success in public health interventions that could provide herd effects. Appreciating the assembly effect can improve the cost-effective strategies for global disease elimination projects. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-021-03726-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8052750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80527502021-04-19 The assembly effect: the connectedness between populations is a double‐edged sword for public health interventions Tun, Sai Thein Than Parker, Daniel M. Aguas, Ricardo White, Lisa J. Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Many public health interventions lead to disruption or decrease of transmission, providing a beneficial effect for people in the population regardless of whether or not they individually participate in the intervention. This protective benefit has been referred to as a herd or community effect and is dependent on sufficient population participation. In practice, public health interventions are implemented at different spatial scales (i.e., at the village, district, or provincial level). Populations, however defined (i.e., neighbourhoods, villages, districts) are frequently connected to other populations through human movement or travel, and this connectedness can influence potential herd effects. METHODS: The impact of a public health intervention (mass drug administration for malaria) was modelled, for different levels of connectedness between populations that have similar disease epidemiology (e.g., two nearby villages which have similar baseline malaria incidences and similar malaria intervention measures), or between populations of varying disease epidemiology (e.g., two nearby villages which have different baseline malaria incidences and/or malaria intervention measures). RESULTS: The overall impact of the interventions deployed could be influenced either positively (adding value to the intervention) or negatively (reducing the impact of the intervention) by how much the intervention units are connected with each other (e.g., how frequent people go to the other village or town) and how different the disease intensity between them are. This phenomenon is termed the “assembly effect”, and it is a meta-population version of the more commonly understood “herd effect”. CONCLUSIONS: The connectedness of intervention units or populations is an important factor to be considered to achieve success in public health interventions that could provide herd effects. Appreciating the assembly effect can improve the cost-effective strategies for global disease elimination projects. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-021-03726-x. BioMed Central 2021-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8052750/ /pubmed/33865392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03726-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Tun, Sai Thein Than Parker, Daniel M. Aguas, Ricardo White, Lisa J. The assembly effect: the connectedness between populations is a double‐edged sword for public health interventions |
title | The assembly effect: the connectedness between populations is a double‐edged sword for public health interventions |
title_full | The assembly effect: the connectedness between populations is a double‐edged sword for public health interventions |
title_fullStr | The assembly effect: the connectedness between populations is a double‐edged sword for public health interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | The assembly effect: the connectedness between populations is a double‐edged sword for public health interventions |
title_short | The assembly effect: the connectedness between populations is a double‐edged sword for public health interventions |
title_sort | assembly effect: the connectedness between populations is a double‐edged sword for public health interventions |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8052750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33865392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03726-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tunsaitheinthan theassemblyeffecttheconnectednessbetweenpopulationsisadoubleedgedswordforpublichealthinterventions AT parkerdanielm theassemblyeffecttheconnectednessbetweenpopulationsisadoubleedgedswordforpublichealthinterventions AT aguasricardo theassemblyeffecttheconnectednessbetweenpopulationsisadoubleedgedswordforpublichealthinterventions AT whitelisaj theassemblyeffecttheconnectednessbetweenpopulationsisadoubleedgedswordforpublichealthinterventions AT tunsaitheinthan assemblyeffecttheconnectednessbetweenpopulationsisadoubleedgedswordforpublichealthinterventions AT parkerdanielm assemblyeffecttheconnectednessbetweenpopulationsisadoubleedgedswordforpublichealthinterventions AT aguasricardo assemblyeffecttheconnectednessbetweenpopulationsisadoubleedgedswordforpublichealthinterventions AT whitelisaj assemblyeffecttheconnectednessbetweenpopulationsisadoubleedgedswordforpublichealthinterventions |