Cargando…

Adjuvant tegafur-uracil (UFT) or S-1 monotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: a single center experience

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil (S-1) is commonly used for gastric cancer in Asia, and tegafur-uracil (UFT) is another oral fluoropyrimidine when S-1 is unavailable. The real-world data of adjuvant UFT has less been investigated. METHODS: Patients with pathological stage II-IIIB (exc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yen, Hung-Hsuan, Chen, Chiung-Nien, Yeh, Chi-Chuan, Lai, I-Rue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8053033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33865416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02233-2
_version_ 1783680037843632128
author Yen, Hung-Hsuan
Chen, Chiung-Nien
Yeh, Chi-Chuan
Lai, I-Rue
author_facet Yen, Hung-Hsuan
Chen, Chiung-Nien
Yeh, Chi-Chuan
Lai, I-Rue
author_sort Yen, Hung-Hsuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adjuvant tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil (S-1) is commonly used for gastric cancer in Asia, and tegafur-uracil (UFT) is another oral fluoropyrimidine when S-1 is unavailable. The real-world data of adjuvant UFT has less been investigated. METHODS: Patients with pathological stage II-IIIB (except T1) gastric cancer receiving adjuvant UFT or S-1 monotherapy after D2 gastrectomy were included. Usage of UFT or S-1 was based on reimbursement policy of the Taiwanese healthcare system. The characteristics, chemotherapy completion rates, and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), were compared between these two groups. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2016, 86 eligible patients were included. Most tumor characteristics were similar between the UFT group (n = 37; age 59.1 ± 13.9 years) and S-1 group (n = 49; age 56.3 ± 10.7 years), except there were significantly more Borrmann type III/IV (86.5% versus 67.3%; p = 0.047) and T4 (56.8% versus 10.2%; p < 0.001) lesions in the UFT group than in the S-1 group. The chemotherapy complete rates were similar in the two groups. The 5-year RFS was 56.1% in the UFT group and 59.6% in the S-1 group (p = 0.71), and the 5-year OS was 78.3% in the UFT group and 73.1% in the S-1 group (p = 0.48). The hazard ratio of adjuvant chemotherapy (S-1 versus UFT) on RFS was 1.25 (95% confidence interval = 0.53-2.94) when Borrmann type and T and N stages were adjusted. CONCLUSIONS: This small cohort study showed adjuvant UFT, and S-1 monotherapy had a comparable long-term outcome for pathological stage II-IIIB gastric cancer following D2 gastrectomy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02233-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8053033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80530332021-04-19 Adjuvant tegafur-uracil (UFT) or S-1 monotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: a single center experience Yen, Hung-Hsuan Chen, Chiung-Nien Yeh, Chi-Chuan Lai, I-Rue World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Adjuvant tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil (S-1) is commonly used for gastric cancer in Asia, and tegafur-uracil (UFT) is another oral fluoropyrimidine when S-1 is unavailable. The real-world data of adjuvant UFT has less been investigated. METHODS: Patients with pathological stage II-IIIB (except T1) gastric cancer receiving adjuvant UFT or S-1 monotherapy after D2 gastrectomy were included. Usage of UFT or S-1 was based on reimbursement policy of the Taiwanese healthcare system. The characteristics, chemotherapy completion rates, and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), were compared between these two groups. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2016, 86 eligible patients were included. Most tumor characteristics were similar between the UFT group (n = 37; age 59.1 ± 13.9 years) and S-1 group (n = 49; age 56.3 ± 10.7 years), except there were significantly more Borrmann type III/IV (86.5% versus 67.3%; p = 0.047) and T4 (56.8% versus 10.2%; p < 0.001) lesions in the UFT group than in the S-1 group. The chemotherapy complete rates were similar in the two groups. The 5-year RFS was 56.1% in the UFT group and 59.6% in the S-1 group (p = 0.71), and the 5-year OS was 78.3% in the UFT group and 73.1% in the S-1 group (p = 0.48). The hazard ratio of adjuvant chemotherapy (S-1 versus UFT) on RFS was 1.25 (95% confidence interval = 0.53-2.94) when Borrmann type and T and N stages were adjusted. CONCLUSIONS: This small cohort study showed adjuvant UFT, and S-1 monotherapy had a comparable long-term outcome for pathological stage II-IIIB gastric cancer following D2 gastrectomy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02233-2. BioMed Central 2021-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8053033/ /pubmed/33865416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02233-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Yen, Hung-Hsuan
Chen, Chiung-Nien
Yeh, Chi-Chuan
Lai, I-Rue
Adjuvant tegafur-uracil (UFT) or S-1 monotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: a single center experience
title Adjuvant tegafur-uracil (UFT) or S-1 monotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: a single center experience
title_full Adjuvant tegafur-uracil (UFT) or S-1 monotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: a single center experience
title_fullStr Adjuvant tegafur-uracil (UFT) or S-1 monotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: a single center experience
title_full_unstemmed Adjuvant tegafur-uracil (UFT) or S-1 monotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: a single center experience
title_short Adjuvant tegafur-uracil (UFT) or S-1 monotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: a single center experience
title_sort adjuvant tegafur-uracil (uft) or s-1 monotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: a single center experience
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8053033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33865416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02233-2
work_keys_str_mv AT yenhunghsuan adjuvanttegafururaciluftors1monotherapyforadvancedgastriccancerasinglecenterexperience
AT chenchiungnien adjuvanttegafururaciluftors1monotherapyforadvancedgastriccancerasinglecenterexperience
AT yehchichuan adjuvanttegafururaciluftors1monotherapyforadvancedgastriccancerasinglecenterexperience
AT laiirue adjuvanttegafururaciluftors1monotherapyforadvancedgastriccancerasinglecenterexperience