Cargando…
Choice of fluorophore affects dynamic DNA nanostructures
The ability to dynamically remodel DNA origami structures or functional nanodevices is highly desired in the field of DNA nanotechnology. Concomitantly, the use of fluorophores to track and validate the dynamics of such DNA-based architectures is commonplace and often unavoidable. It is therefore cr...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8053122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33784399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab201 |
_version_ | 1783680056878432256 |
---|---|
author | Jahnke, Kevin Grubmüller, Helmut Igaev, Maxim Göpfrich, Kerstin |
author_facet | Jahnke, Kevin Grubmüller, Helmut Igaev, Maxim Göpfrich, Kerstin |
author_sort | Jahnke, Kevin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ability to dynamically remodel DNA origami structures or functional nanodevices is highly desired in the field of DNA nanotechnology. Concomitantly, the use of fluorophores to track and validate the dynamics of such DNA-based architectures is commonplace and often unavoidable. It is therefore crucial to be aware of the side effects of popular fluorophores, which are often exchanged without considering the potential impact on the system. Here, we show that the choice of fluorophore can strongly affect the reconfiguration of DNA nanostructures. To this end, we encapsulate a triple-stranded DNA (tsDNA) into water-in-oil compartments and functionalize their periphery with a single-stranded DNA handle (ssDNA). Thus, the tsDNA can bind and unbind from the periphery by reversible opening of the triplex and subsequent strand displacement. Using a combination of experiments, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and reaction-diffusion modelling, we demonstrate for 12 different fluorophore combinations that it is possible to alter or even inhibit the DNA nanostructure formation—without changing the DNA sequence. Besides its immediate importance for the design of pH-responsive switches and fluorophore labelling, our work presents a strategy to precisely tune the energy landscape of dynamic DNA nanodevices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8053122 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80531222021-04-21 Choice of fluorophore affects dynamic DNA nanostructures Jahnke, Kevin Grubmüller, Helmut Igaev, Maxim Göpfrich, Kerstin Nucleic Acids Res Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering The ability to dynamically remodel DNA origami structures or functional nanodevices is highly desired in the field of DNA nanotechnology. Concomitantly, the use of fluorophores to track and validate the dynamics of such DNA-based architectures is commonplace and often unavoidable. It is therefore crucial to be aware of the side effects of popular fluorophores, which are often exchanged without considering the potential impact on the system. Here, we show that the choice of fluorophore can strongly affect the reconfiguration of DNA nanostructures. To this end, we encapsulate a triple-stranded DNA (tsDNA) into water-in-oil compartments and functionalize their periphery with a single-stranded DNA handle (ssDNA). Thus, the tsDNA can bind and unbind from the periphery by reversible opening of the triplex and subsequent strand displacement. Using a combination of experiments, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and reaction-diffusion modelling, we demonstrate for 12 different fluorophore combinations that it is possible to alter or even inhibit the DNA nanostructure formation—without changing the DNA sequence. Besides its immediate importance for the design of pH-responsive switches and fluorophore labelling, our work presents a strategy to precisely tune the energy landscape of dynamic DNA nanodevices. Oxford University Press 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8053122/ /pubmed/33784399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab201 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering Jahnke, Kevin Grubmüller, Helmut Igaev, Maxim Göpfrich, Kerstin Choice of fluorophore affects dynamic DNA nanostructures |
title | Choice of fluorophore affects dynamic DNA nanostructures |
title_full | Choice of fluorophore affects dynamic DNA nanostructures |
title_fullStr | Choice of fluorophore affects dynamic DNA nanostructures |
title_full_unstemmed | Choice of fluorophore affects dynamic DNA nanostructures |
title_short | Choice of fluorophore affects dynamic DNA nanostructures |
title_sort | choice of fluorophore affects dynamic dna nanostructures |
topic | Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8053122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33784399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab201 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jahnkekevin choiceoffluorophoreaffectsdynamicdnananostructures AT grubmullerhelmut choiceoffluorophoreaffectsdynamicdnananostructures AT igaevmaxim choiceoffluorophoreaffectsdynamicdnananostructures AT gopfrichkerstin choiceoffluorophoreaffectsdynamicdnananostructures |