Cargando…

Adherence to Adalimumab Was Not Improved by a Reminder-Based Intervention with an Electronic Needle Container

BACKGROUND: Adherence to adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is reported to be below par. Non-adherence may result in loss-of-response and increased hospitalization. We analyzed the effect of an electronic needle container (ENC) on adherence to adalimumab. METHODS: In this multic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schultheiss, Johannes P. D., Altena, Sandra, Clevers, Max R., Baas, Dominique, Jharap, Bindia, Fidder, Herma H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8053164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32556818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06395-z
_version_ 1783680066329247744
author Schultheiss, Johannes P. D.
Altena, Sandra
Clevers, Max R.
Baas, Dominique
Jharap, Bindia
Fidder, Herma H.
author_facet Schultheiss, Johannes P. D.
Altena, Sandra
Clevers, Max R.
Baas, Dominique
Jharap, Bindia
Fidder, Herma H.
author_sort Schultheiss, Johannes P. D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adherence to adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is reported to be below par. Non-adherence may result in loss-of-response and increased hospitalization. We analyzed the effect of an electronic needle container (ENC) on adherence to adalimumab. METHODS: In this multicenter, 12-months observational study, we included adalimumab treated IBD patients. All patients were invited to receive an ENC. Patients who declined or did not complete the registration for an ENC served as controls. Primary endpoint was whether an ENC increased adherence, calculated from pharmacy refills as proportion of days covered (PDC). Secondary endpoints were clinical outcomes, including loss-of-response, identification of predictors of adherence and correlation between different modalities for measuring adherence. Loss-of-response was defined as a disease flare, dose-escalation or IBD-related hospitalization or surgery. RESULTS: The pharmacies’ records identified 198 eligible patients, of whom 32 were excluded. The ENC was supplied to 69 patients, the remaining 97 patient formed the control group. Median baseline PDC (98.4% vs. 96.1%, p = 0.047) and the proportion of adherent (PDC ≥ 86%) patients (87.0% vs. 74.2%, p = 0.045) was higher for the ENC group. The ENC did not improve the adherence of patients during follow-up (odds ratio 1.26, 95% CI 0.55–2.86). During follow-up, five (7.2%) patients in the ENC group and 13 (13.4%) in the control group discontinued adalimumab (log-rank p = 0.22). Loss-of-response occurred in 12 (17.4%) and 14 (14.4%) patients, respectively (log-rank p = 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show no beneficial effect of a reminder-based intervention on adherence or treatment outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8053164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80531642021-04-29 Adherence to Adalimumab Was Not Improved by a Reminder-Based Intervention with an Electronic Needle Container Schultheiss, Johannes P. D. Altena, Sandra Clevers, Max R. Baas, Dominique Jharap, Bindia Fidder, Herma H. Dig Dis Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Adherence to adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is reported to be below par. Non-adherence may result in loss-of-response and increased hospitalization. We analyzed the effect of an electronic needle container (ENC) on adherence to adalimumab. METHODS: In this multicenter, 12-months observational study, we included adalimumab treated IBD patients. All patients were invited to receive an ENC. Patients who declined or did not complete the registration for an ENC served as controls. Primary endpoint was whether an ENC increased adherence, calculated from pharmacy refills as proportion of days covered (PDC). Secondary endpoints were clinical outcomes, including loss-of-response, identification of predictors of adherence and correlation between different modalities for measuring adherence. Loss-of-response was defined as a disease flare, dose-escalation or IBD-related hospitalization or surgery. RESULTS: The pharmacies’ records identified 198 eligible patients, of whom 32 were excluded. The ENC was supplied to 69 patients, the remaining 97 patient formed the control group. Median baseline PDC (98.4% vs. 96.1%, p = 0.047) and the proportion of adherent (PDC ≥ 86%) patients (87.0% vs. 74.2%, p = 0.045) was higher for the ENC group. The ENC did not improve the adherence of patients during follow-up (odds ratio 1.26, 95% CI 0.55–2.86). During follow-up, five (7.2%) patients in the ENC group and 13 (13.4%) in the control group discontinued adalimumab (log-rank p = 0.22). Loss-of-response occurred in 12 (17.4%) and 14 (14.4%) patients, respectively (log-rank p = 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show no beneficial effect of a reminder-based intervention on adherence or treatment outcomes. Springer US 2020-06-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8053164/ /pubmed/32556818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06395-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Schultheiss, Johannes P. D.
Altena, Sandra
Clevers, Max R.
Baas, Dominique
Jharap, Bindia
Fidder, Herma H.
Adherence to Adalimumab Was Not Improved by a Reminder-Based Intervention with an Electronic Needle Container
title Adherence to Adalimumab Was Not Improved by a Reminder-Based Intervention with an Electronic Needle Container
title_full Adherence to Adalimumab Was Not Improved by a Reminder-Based Intervention with an Electronic Needle Container
title_fullStr Adherence to Adalimumab Was Not Improved by a Reminder-Based Intervention with an Electronic Needle Container
title_full_unstemmed Adherence to Adalimumab Was Not Improved by a Reminder-Based Intervention with an Electronic Needle Container
title_short Adherence to Adalimumab Was Not Improved by a Reminder-Based Intervention with an Electronic Needle Container
title_sort adherence to adalimumab was not improved by a reminder-based intervention with an electronic needle container
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8053164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32556818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06395-z
work_keys_str_mv AT schultheissjohannespd adherencetoadalimumabwasnotimprovedbyareminderbasedinterventionwithanelectronicneedlecontainer
AT altenasandra adherencetoadalimumabwasnotimprovedbyareminderbasedinterventionwithanelectronicneedlecontainer
AT cleversmaxr adherencetoadalimumabwasnotimprovedbyareminderbasedinterventionwithanelectronicneedlecontainer
AT baasdominique adherencetoadalimumabwasnotimprovedbyareminderbasedinterventionwithanelectronicneedlecontainer
AT jharapbindia adherencetoadalimumabwasnotimprovedbyareminderbasedinterventionwithanelectronicneedlecontainer
AT fidderhermah adherencetoadalimumabwasnotimprovedbyareminderbasedinterventionwithanelectronicneedlecontainer