Cargando…

Machine learning enables noninvasive prediction of atrial fibrillation driver location and acute pulmonary vein ablation success using the 12-lead ECG

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common supraventricular arrhythmia, characterized by disorganized atrial electrical activity, maintained by localized arrhythmogenic atrial drivers. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) allows to exclude PV-related drivers. However, PVI is less effective in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luongo, Giorgio, Azzolin, Luca, Schuler, Steffen, Rivolta, Massimo W., Almeida, Tiago P., Martínez, Juan P., Soriano, Diogo C., Luik, Armin, Müller-Edenborn, Björn, Jadidi, Amir, Dössel, Olaf, Sassi, Roberto, Laguna, Pablo, Loewe, Axel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8053175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33899043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2021.03.002
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common supraventricular arrhythmia, characterized by disorganized atrial electrical activity, maintained by localized arrhythmogenic atrial drivers. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) allows to exclude PV-related drivers. However, PVI is less effective in patients with additional extra-PV arrhythmogenic drivers. OBJECTIVES: To discriminate whether AF drivers are located near the PVs vs extra-PV regions using the noninvasive 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) in a computational and clinical framework, and to computationally predict the acute success of PVI in these cohorts of data. METHODS: AF drivers were induced in 2 computerized atrial models and combined with 8 torso models, resulting in 1128 12-lead ECGs (80 ECGs with AF drivers located in the PVs and 1048 in extra-PV areas). A total of 103 features were extracted from the signals. Binary decision tree classifier was trained on the simulated data and evaluated using hold-out cross-validation. The PVs were subsequently isolated in the models to assess PVI success. Finally, the classifier was tested on a clinical dataset (46 patients: 23 PV-dependent AF and 23 with additional extra-PV sources). RESULTS: The classifier yielded 82.6% specificity and 73.9% sensitivity for detecting PV drivers on the clinical data. Consistency analysis on the 46 patients resulted in 93.5% results match. Applying PVI on the simulated AF cases terminated AF in 100% of the cases in the PV class. CONCLUSION: Machine learning–based classification of 12-lead-ECG allows discrimination between patients with PV drivers vs those with extra-PV drivers of AF. The novel algorithm may aid to identify patients with high acute success rates to PVI.