Cargando…

Sex-Specific Differences in Running Injuries: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression

BACKGROUND: Running is a popular sport with high injury rates. Although risk factors have intensively been investigated, synthesized knowledge about the differences in injury rates of female and male runners is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To systematically investigate the differences in injury rates and char...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hollander, Karsten, Rahlf, Anna Lina, Wilke, Jan, Edler, Christopher, Steib, Simon, Junge, Astrid, Zech, Astrid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8053184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33433864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01412-7
_version_ 1783680070949273600
author Hollander, Karsten
Rahlf, Anna Lina
Wilke, Jan
Edler, Christopher
Steib, Simon
Junge, Astrid
Zech, Astrid
author_facet Hollander, Karsten
Rahlf, Anna Lina
Wilke, Jan
Edler, Christopher
Steib, Simon
Junge, Astrid
Zech, Astrid
author_sort Hollander, Karsten
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Running is a popular sport with high injury rates. Although risk factors have intensively been investigated, synthesized knowledge about the differences in injury rates of female and male runners is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To systematically investigate the differences in injury rates and characteristics between female and male runners. METHODS: Database searches (PubMed, Web of Science, PEDro, SPORTDiscus) were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using the keywords “running AND injur*”. Prospective studies reporting running related injury rates for both sexes were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the risk ratios (RR) for the occurrence of injuries in female vs. male runners. Potential moderators (effect modifiers) were analysed using meta-regression. RESULTS: After removal of duplicates, 12,215 articles were screened. Thirty-eight studies were included and the OR of 31 could be pooled in the quantitative analysis. The overall injury rate was 20.8 (95% CI 19.9–21.7) injuries per 100 female runners and 20.4 (95% CI 19.7–21.1) injuries per 100 male runners. Meta-analysis revealed no differences between sexes for overall injuries reported per 100 runners (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.90–1.10, n = 24) and per hours or athlete exposure (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69–1.27, n = 6). Female sex was associated with a more frequent occurrence of bone stress injury (RR (for males) 0.52, 95% CI 0.36–0.76, n = 5) while male runners had higher risk for Achilles tendinopathies (RR 1. 86, 95% CI 1.25–2.79, n = 2). Meta-regression showed an association between a higher injury risk and competition distances of 10 km and shorter in female runners (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.00–1.69). CONCLUSION: Differences between female and male runners in specific injury diagnoses should be considered in the development of individualised and sex-specific prevention and rehabilitation strategies to manage running-related injuries. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40279-020-01412-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8053184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80531842021-05-05 Sex-Specific Differences in Running Injuries: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression Hollander, Karsten Rahlf, Anna Lina Wilke, Jan Edler, Christopher Steib, Simon Junge, Astrid Zech, Astrid Sports Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Running is a popular sport with high injury rates. Although risk factors have intensively been investigated, synthesized knowledge about the differences in injury rates of female and male runners is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To systematically investigate the differences in injury rates and characteristics between female and male runners. METHODS: Database searches (PubMed, Web of Science, PEDro, SPORTDiscus) were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using the keywords “running AND injur*”. Prospective studies reporting running related injury rates for both sexes were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the risk ratios (RR) for the occurrence of injuries in female vs. male runners. Potential moderators (effect modifiers) were analysed using meta-regression. RESULTS: After removal of duplicates, 12,215 articles were screened. Thirty-eight studies were included and the OR of 31 could be pooled in the quantitative analysis. The overall injury rate was 20.8 (95% CI 19.9–21.7) injuries per 100 female runners and 20.4 (95% CI 19.7–21.1) injuries per 100 male runners. Meta-analysis revealed no differences between sexes for overall injuries reported per 100 runners (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.90–1.10, n = 24) and per hours or athlete exposure (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69–1.27, n = 6). Female sex was associated with a more frequent occurrence of bone stress injury (RR (for males) 0.52, 95% CI 0.36–0.76, n = 5) while male runners had higher risk for Achilles tendinopathies (RR 1. 86, 95% CI 1.25–2.79, n = 2). Meta-regression showed an association between a higher injury risk and competition distances of 10 km and shorter in female runners (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.00–1.69). CONCLUSION: Differences between female and male runners in specific injury diagnoses should be considered in the development of individualised and sex-specific prevention and rehabilitation strategies to manage running-related injuries. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40279-020-01412-7. Springer International Publishing 2021-01-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8053184/ /pubmed/33433864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01412-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Hollander, Karsten
Rahlf, Anna Lina
Wilke, Jan
Edler, Christopher
Steib, Simon
Junge, Astrid
Zech, Astrid
Sex-Specific Differences in Running Injuries: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression
title Sex-Specific Differences in Running Injuries: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression
title_full Sex-Specific Differences in Running Injuries: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression
title_fullStr Sex-Specific Differences in Running Injuries: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression
title_full_unstemmed Sex-Specific Differences in Running Injuries: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression
title_short Sex-Specific Differences in Running Injuries: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression
title_sort sex-specific differences in running injuries: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8053184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33433864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01412-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hollanderkarsten sexspecificdifferencesinrunninginjuriesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandmetaregression
AT rahlfannalina sexspecificdifferencesinrunninginjuriesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandmetaregression
AT wilkejan sexspecificdifferencesinrunninginjuriesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandmetaregression
AT edlerchristopher sexspecificdifferencesinrunninginjuriesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandmetaregression
AT steibsimon sexspecificdifferencesinrunninginjuriesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandmetaregression
AT jungeastrid sexspecificdifferencesinrunninginjuriesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandmetaregression
AT zechastrid sexspecificdifferencesinrunninginjuriesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandmetaregression