Cargando…
Sex-Specific Differences in Running Injuries: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression
BACKGROUND: Running is a popular sport with high injury rates. Although risk factors have intensively been investigated, synthesized knowledge about the differences in injury rates of female and male runners is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To systematically investigate the differences in injury rates and char...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8053184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33433864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01412-7 |
_version_ | 1783680070949273600 |
---|---|
author | Hollander, Karsten Rahlf, Anna Lina Wilke, Jan Edler, Christopher Steib, Simon Junge, Astrid Zech, Astrid |
author_facet | Hollander, Karsten Rahlf, Anna Lina Wilke, Jan Edler, Christopher Steib, Simon Junge, Astrid Zech, Astrid |
author_sort | Hollander, Karsten |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Running is a popular sport with high injury rates. Although risk factors have intensively been investigated, synthesized knowledge about the differences in injury rates of female and male runners is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To systematically investigate the differences in injury rates and characteristics between female and male runners. METHODS: Database searches (PubMed, Web of Science, PEDro, SPORTDiscus) were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using the keywords “running AND injur*”. Prospective studies reporting running related injury rates for both sexes were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the risk ratios (RR) for the occurrence of injuries in female vs. male runners. Potential moderators (effect modifiers) were analysed using meta-regression. RESULTS: After removal of duplicates, 12,215 articles were screened. Thirty-eight studies were included and the OR of 31 could be pooled in the quantitative analysis. The overall injury rate was 20.8 (95% CI 19.9–21.7) injuries per 100 female runners and 20.4 (95% CI 19.7–21.1) injuries per 100 male runners. Meta-analysis revealed no differences between sexes for overall injuries reported per 100 runners (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.90–1.10, n = 24) and per hours or athlete exposure (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69–1.27, n = 6). Female sex was associated with a more frequent occurrence of bone stress injury (RR (for males) 0.52, 95% CI 0.36–0.76, n = 5) while male runners had higher risk for Achilles tendinopathies (RR 1. 86, 95% CI 1.25–2.79, n = 2). Meta-regression showed an association between a higher injury risk and competition distances of 10 km and shorter in female runners (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.00–1.69). CONCLUSION: Differences between female and male runners in specific injury diagnoses should be considered in the development of individualised and sex-specific prevention and rehabilitation strategies to manage running-related injuries. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40279-020-01412-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8053184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80531842021-05-05 Sex-Specific Differences in Running Injuries: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression Hollander, Karsten Rahlf, Anna Lina Wilke, Jan Edler, Christopher Steib, Simon Junge, Astrid Zech, Astrid Sports Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Running is a popular sport with high injury rates. Although risk factors have intensively been investigated, synthesized knowledge about the differences in injury rates of female and male runners is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To systematically investigate the differences in injury rates and characteristics between female and male runners. METHODS: Database searches (PubMed, Web of Science, PEDro, SPORTDiscus) were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using the keywords “running AND injur*”. Prospective studies reporting running related injury rates for both sexes were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the risk ratios (RR) for the occurrence of injuries in female vs. male runners. Potential moderators (effect modifiers) were analysed using meta-regression. RESULTS: After removal of duplicates, 12,215 articles were screened. Thirty-eight studies were included and the OR of 31 could be pooled in the quantitative analysis. The overall injury rate was 20.8 (95% CI 19.9–21.7) injuries per 100 female runners and 20.4 (95% CI 19.7–21.1) injuries per 100 male runners. Meta-analysis revealed no differences between sexes for overall injuries reported per 100 runners (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.90–1.10, n = 24) and per hours or athlete exposure (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69–1.27, n = 6). Female sex was associated with a more frequent occurrence of bone stress injury (RR (for males) 0.52, 95% CI 0.36–0.76, n = 5) while male runners had higher risk for Achilles tendinopathies (RR 1. 86, 95% CI 1.25–2.79, n = 2). Meta-regression showed an association between a higher injury risk and competition distances of 10 km and shorter in female runners (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.00–1.69). CONCLUSION: Differences between female and male runners in specific injury diagnoses should be considered in the development of individualised and sex-specific prevention and rehabilitation strategies to manage running-related injuries. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40279-020-01412-7. Springer International Publishing 2021-01-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8053184/ /pubmed/33433864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01412-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Hollander, Karsten Rahlf, Anna Lina Wilke, Jan Edler, Christopher Steib, Simon Junge, Astrid Zech, Astrid Sex-Specific Differences in Running Injuries: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression |
title | Sex-Specific Differences in Running Injuries: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression |
title_full | Sex-Specific Differences in Running Injuries: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression |
title_fullStr | Sex-Specific Differences in Running Injuries: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex-Specific Differences in Running Injuries: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression |
title_short | Sex-Specific Differences in Running Injuries: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression |
title_sort | sex-specific differences in running injuries: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8053184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33433864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01412-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hollanderkarsten sexspecificdifferencesinrunninginjuriesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandmetaregression AT rahlfannalina sexspecificdifferencesinrunninginjuriesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandmetaregression AT wilkejan sexspecificdifferencesinrunninginjuriesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandmetaregression AT edlerchristopher sexspecificdifferencesinrunninginjuriesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandmetaregression AT steibsimon sexspecificdifferencesinrunninginjuriesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandmetaregression AT jungeastrid sexspecificdifferencesinrunninginjuriesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandmetaregression AT zechastrid sexspecificdifferencesinrunninginjuriesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandmetaregression |