Cargando…

Comparative analysis of antigen and molecular tests for the detection of Sars-CoV-2 and related variants: A study on 4266 samples

OBJECTIVES: The present study compared the performance of the Lumipulse G Sars-CoV-2 Ag kit with the TaqPath COVID-19 RT-PCR CE IVD kit. METHODS: The study was conducted on 4266 naso-oropharyngeal swabs. Samples were subjected to antigen RT-PCR tests for the detection of Sars-CoV-2 and related varia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caputo, Valerio, Bax, Cristina, Colantoni, Luca, Peconi, Cristina, Termine, Andrea, Fabrizio, Carlo, Calvino, Giulia, Luzzi, Laura, Panunzi, Giorgia Gaia, Fusco, Claudia, Strafella, Claudia, Cascella, Raffaella, Battistini, Luca, Caltagirone, Carlo, Salvia, Antonino, Sancesario, Giulia, Giardina, Emiliano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8053214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33878460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.048
_version_ 1783680077285818368
author Caputo, Valerio
Bax, Cristina
Colantoni, Luca
Peconi, Cristina
Termine, Andrea
Fabrizio, Carlo
Calvino, Giulia
Luzzi, Laura
Panunzi, Giorgia Gaia
Fusco, Claudia
Strafella, Claudia
Cascella, Raffaella
Battistini, Luca
Caltagirone, Carlo
Salvia, Antonino
Sancesario, Giulia
Giardina, Emiliano
author_facet Caputo, Valerio
Bax, Cristina
Colantoni, Luca
Peconi, Cristina
Termine, Andrea
Fabrizio, Carlo
Calvino, Giulia
Luzzi, Laura
Panunzi, Giorgia Gaia
Fusco, Claudia
Strafella, Claudia
Cascella, Raffaella
Battistini, Luca
Caltagirone, Carlo
Salvia, Antonino
Sancesario, Giulia
Giardina, Emiliano
author_sort Caputo, Valerio
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The present study compared the performance of the Lumipulse G Sars-CoV-2 Ag kit with the TaqPath COVID-19 RT-PCR CE IVD kit. METHODS: The study was conducted on 4266 naso-oropharyngeal swabs. Samples were subjected to antigen RT-PCR tests for the detection of Sars-CoV-2 and related variants. Statistical analyses were conducted in R software. RESULTS: We found 503 positives (including 138 H69-V70 deletion carriers) and 3763 negatives by RT-PCR, whereas 538 positives and 3728 negatives were obtained by antigen testing. We achieved empirical and binormal AU-ROCs of 0.920 and 0.990, accuracy of 0.960, sensitivity of 0.866, specificity of 0.973, positive and negative predictive values of 0.810 and 0.980. We obtained a positive correlation between viral loads and antigen levels (R(2) = 0.81), finding a complete concordance for high viral loads (log(10) copies/mL > 5.4). Antigen levels > 222 pg/mL were found to be reliable in assigning positive samples (p < 0.01). Concerning variant carriers, antigen test detected them with the same accuracy as other positive samples. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular and antigen tests should be evaluated regarding the prevalence of the area. In case of low prevalence, antigen testing can be employed as a first-line screening for the timely identification of affected individuals with high viral load, also if carriers of Sars-CoV-2 variants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8053214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80532142021-04-19 Comparative analysis of antigen and molecular tests for the detection of Sars-CoV-2 and related variants: A study on 4266 samples Caputo, Valerio Bax, Cristina Colantoni, Luca Peconi, Cristina Termine, Andrea Fabrizio, Carlo Calvino, Giulia Luzzi, Laura Panunzi, Giorgia Gaia Fusco, Claudia Strafella, Claudia Cascella, Raffaella Battistini, Luca Caltagirone, Carlo Salvia, Antonino Sancesario, Giulia Giardina, Emiliano Int J Infect Dis Short Communication OBJECTIVES: The present study compared the performance of the Lumipulse G Sars-CoV-2 Ag kit with the TaqPath COVID-19 RT-PCR CE IVD kit. METHODS: The study was conducted on 4266 naso-oropharyngeal swabs. Samples were subjected to antigen RT-PCR tests for the detection of Sars-CoV-2 and related variants. Statistical analyses were conducted in R software. RESULTS: We found 503 positives (including 138 H69-V70 deletion carriers) and 3763 negatives by RT-PCR, whereas 538 positives and 3728 negatives were obtained by antigen testing. We achieved empirical and binormal AU-ROCs of 0.920 and 0.990, accuracy of 0.960, sensitivity of 0.866, specificity of 0.973, positive and negative predictive values of 0.810 and 0.980. We obtained a positive correlation between viral loads and antigen levels (R(2) = 0.81), finding a complete concordance for high viral loads (log(10) copies/mL > 5.4). Antigen levels > 222 pg/mL were found to be reliable in assigning positive samples (p < 0.01). Concerning variant carriers, antigen test detected them with the same accuracy as other positive samples. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular and antigen tests should be evaluated regarding the prevalence of the area. In case of low prevalence, antigen testing can be employed as a first-line screening for the timely identification of affected individuals with high viral load, also if carriers of Sars-CoV-2 variants. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2021-07 2021-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8053214/ /pubmed/33878460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.048 Text en © 2021 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Caputo, Valerio
Bax, Cristina
Colantoni, Luca
Peconi, Cristina
Termine, Andrea
Fabrizio, Carlo
Calvino, Giulia
Luzzi, Laura
Panunzi, Giorgia Gaia
Fusco, Claudia
Strafella, Claudia
Cascella, Raffaella
Battistini, Luca
Caltagirone, Carlo
Salvia, Antonino
Sancesario, Giulia
Giardina, Emiliano
Comparative analysis of antigen and molecular tests for the detection of Sars-CoV-2 and related variants: A study on 4266 samples
title Comparative analysis of antigen and molecular tests for the detection of Sars-CoV-2 and related variants: A study on 4266 samples
title_full Comparative analysis of antigen and molecular tests for the detection of Sars-CoV-2 and related variants: A study on 4266 samples
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of antigen and molecular tests for the detection of Sars-CoV-2 and related variants: A study on 4266 samples
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of antigen and molecular tests for the detection of Sars-CoV-2 and related variants: A study on 4266 samples
title_short Comparative analysis of antigen and molecular tests for the detection of Sars-CoV-2 and related variants: A study on 4266 samples
title_sort comparative analysis of antigen and molecular tests for the detection of sars-cov-2 and related variants: a study on 4266 samples
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8053214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33878460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.048
work_keys_str_mv AT caputovalerio comparativeanalysisofantigenandmoleculartestsforthedetectionofsarscov2andrelatedvariantsastudyon4266samples
AT baxcristina comparativeanalysisofantigenandmoleculartestsforthedetectionofsarscov2andrelatedvariantsastudyon4266samples
AT colantoniluca comparativeanalysisofantigenandmoleculartestsforthedetectionofsarscov2andrelatedvariantsastudyon4266samples
AT peconicristina comparativeanalysisofantigenandmoleculartestsforthedetectionofsarscov2andrelatedvariantsastudyon4266samples
AT termineandrea comparativeanalysisofantigenandmoleculartestsforthedetectionofsarscov2andrelatedvariantsastudyon4266samples
AT fabriziocarlo comparativeanalysisofantigenandmoleculartestsforthedetectionofsarscov2andrelatedvariantsastudyon4266samples
AT calvinogiulia comparativeanalysisofantigenandmoleculartestsforthedetectionofsarscov2andrelatedvariantsastudyon4266samples
AT luzzilaura comparativeanalysisofantigenandmoleculartestsforthedetectionofsarscov2andrelatedvariantsastudyon4266samples
AT panunzigiorgiagaia comparativeanalysisofantigenandmoleculartestsforthedetectionofsarscov2andrelatedvariantsastudyon4266samples
AT fuscoclaudia comparativeanalysisofantigenandmoleculartestsforthedetectionofsarscov2andrelatedvariantsastudyon4266samples
AT strafellaclaudia comparativeanalysisofantigenandmoleculartestsforthedetectionofsarscov2andrelatedvariantsastudyon4266samples
AT cascellaraffaella comparativeanalysisofantigenandmoleculartestsforthedetectionofsarscov2andrelatedvariantsastudyon4266samples
AT battistiniluca comparativeanalysisofantigenandmoleculartestsforthedetectionofsarscov2andrelatedvariantsastudyon4266samples
AT caltagironecarlo comparativeanalysisofantigenandmoleculartestsforthedetectionofsarscov2andrelatedvariantsastudyon4266samples
AT salviaantonino comparativeanalysisofantigenandmoleculartestsforthedetectionofsarscov2andrelatedvariantsastudyon4266samples
AT sancesariogiulia comparativeanalysisofantigenandmoleculartestsforthedetectionofsarscov2andrelatedvariantsastudyon4266samples
AT giardinaemiliano comparativeanalysisofantigenandmoleculartestsforthedetectionofsarscov2andrelatedvariantsastudyon4266samples