Cargando…
Performance characteristics of five antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) for SARS-CoV-2 asymptomatic infection: a head-to-head benchmark comparison
BACKGROUND: Mass testing for early identification and isolation of infectious COVID-19 individuals is efficacious for reducing disease spread. Antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT) may be suitable for testing strategies; however, benchmark comparisons are scarce. METHODS: We used 286 nas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8053403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33882299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2021.04.009 |
_version_ | 1783680114383388672 |
---|---|
author | Baro, Bàrbara Rodo, Pau Ouchi, Dan Bordoy, Antoni E. Saya Amaro, Emilio N. Salsench, Sergi V. Molinos, Sònia Alemany, Andrea Ubals, Maria Corbacho-Monné, Marc Millat-Martinez, Pere Marks, Michael Clotet, Bonaventura Prat, Nuria Estrada, Oriol Vilar, Marc Ara, Jordi Vall-Mayans, Martí G-Beiras, Camila Bassat, Quique Blanco, Ignacio Mitjà, Oriol |
author_facet | Baro, Bàrbara Rodo, Pau Ouchi, Dan Bordoy, Antoni E. Saya Amaro, Emilio N. Salsench, Sergi V. Molinos, Sònia Alemany, Andrea Ubals, Maria Corbacho-Monné, Marc Millat-Martinez, Pere Marks, Michael Clotet, Bonaventura Prat, Nuria Estrada, Oriol Vilar, Marc Ara, Jordi Vall-Mayans, Martí G-Beiras, Camila Bassat, Quique Blanco, Ignacio Mitjà, Oriol |
author_sort | Baro, Bàrbara |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mass testing for early identification and isolation of infectious COVID-19 individuals is efficacious for reducing disease spread. Antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT) may be suitable for testing strategies; however, benchmark comparisons are scarce. METHODS: We used 286 nasopharyngeal specimens from unexposed asymptomatic individuals collected between December 2020 and January 2021 to assess five Ag-RDTs marketed by Abbott, Siemens, Roche Diagnostics, Lepu Medical, and Surescreen. RESULTS: For the overall sample, the performance parameters of Ag-RDTs were as follows: Abbott assay, sensitivity 38.6% (95%CI 29.1–48.8) and specificity 99.5% (97–100%); Siemens, sensitivity 51.5% (41.3–61.6) and specificity 98.4% (95.3–99.6); Roche, sensitivity 43.6% (33.7–53.8) and specificity 96.2% (92.4–98.5); Lepu, sensitivity 45.5% (35.6–55.8) and specificity 89.2% (83.8–93.3%); Surescreen, sensitivity 28.8% (20.2–38.6) and specificity 97.8% (94.5–99.4%). For specimens with cycle threshold (Ct) <30 in RT-qPCR, all Ag-RDT achieved a sensitivity ≥70%. The modelled negative- and positive-predictive value for 1% prevalence were >99% and <50%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: When screening unexposed asymptomatic individuals, two Ag-RDTs achieved sensitivity ≥80% for specimens with Ct<30 and specificity ≥96%. The estimated negative predictive value suggests the suitability of Ag-RDTs for mass screenings of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the general population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8053403 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80534032021-04-19 Performance characteristics of five antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) for SARS-CoV-2 asymptomatic infection: a head-to-head benchmark comparison Baro, Bàrbara Rodo, Pau Ouchi, Dan Bordoy, Antoni E. Saya Amaro, Emilio N. Salsench, Sergi V. Molinos, Sònia Alemany, Andrea Ubals, Maria Corbacho-Monné, Marc Millat-Martinez, Pere Marks, Michael Clotet, Bonaventura Prat, Nuria Estrada, Oriol Vilar, Marc Ara, Jordi Vall-Mayans, Martí G-Beiras, Camila Bassat, Quique Blanco, Ignacio Mitjà, Oriol J Infect Article BACKGROUND: Mass testing for early identification and isolation of infectious COVID-19 individuals is efficacious for reducing disease spread. Antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT) may be suitable for testing strategies; however, benchmark comparisons are scarce. METHODS: We used 286 nasopharyngeal specimens from unexposed asymptomatic individuals collected between December 2020 and January 2021 to assess five Ag-RDTs marketed by Abbott, Siemens, Roche Diagnostics, Lepu Medical, and Surescreen. RESULTS: For the overall sample, the performance parameters of Ag-RDTs were as follows: Abbott assay, sensitivity 38.6% (95%CI 29.1–48.8) and specificity 99.5% (97–100%); Siemens, sensitivity 51.5% (41.3–61.6) and specificity 98.4% (95.3–99.6); Roche, sensitivity 43.6% (33.7–53.8) and specificity 96.2% (92.4–98.5); Lepu, sensitivity 45.5% (35.6–55.8) and specificity 89.2% (83.8–93.3%); Surescreen, sensitivity 28.8% (20.2–38.6) and specificity 97.8% (94.5–99.4%). For specimens with cycle threshold (Ct) <30 in RT-qPCR, all Ag-RDT achieved a sensitivity ≥70%. The modelled negative- and positive-predictive value for 1% prevalence were >99% and <50%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: When screening unexposed asymptomatic individuals, two Ag-RDTs achieved sensitivity ≥80% for specimens with Ct<30 and specificity ≥96%. The estimated negative predictive value suggests the suitability of Ag-RDTs for mass screenings of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the general population. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association. 2021-06 2021-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8053403/ /pubmed/33882299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2021.04.009 Text en © 2021 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Baro, Bàrbara Rodo, Pau Ouchi, Dan Bordoy, Antoni E. Saya Amaro, Emilio N. Salsench, Sergi V. Molinos, Sònia Alemany, Andrea Ubals, Maria Corbacho-Monné, Marc Millat-Martinez, Pere Marks, Michael Clotet, Bonaventura Prat, Nuria Estrada, Oriol Vilar, Marc Ara, Jordi Vall-Mayans, Martí G-Beiras, Camila Bassat, Quique Blanco, Ignacio Mitjà, Oriol Performance characteristics of five antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) for SARS-CoV-2 asymptomatic infection: a head-to-head benchmark comparison |
title | Performance characteristics of five antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) for SARS-CoV-2 asymptomatic infection: a head-to-head benchmark comparison |
title_full | Performance characteristics of five antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) for SARS-CoV-2 asymptomatic infection: a head-to-head benchmark comparison |
title_fullStr | Performance characteristics of five antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) for SARS-CoV-2 asymptomatic infection: a head-to-head benchmark comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance characteristics of five antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) for SARS-CoV-2 asymptomatic infection: a head-to-head benchmark comparison |
title_short | Performance characteristics of five antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) for SARS-CoV-2 asymptomatic infection: a head-to-head benchmark comparison |
title_sort | performance characteristics of five antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test (ag-rdt) for sars-cov-2 asymptomatic infection: a head-to-head benchmark comparison |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8053403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33882299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2021.04.009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barobarbara performancecharacteristicsoffiveantigendetectingrapiddiagnostictestagrdtforsarscov2asymptomaticinfectionaheadtoheadbenchmarkcomparison AT rodopau performancecharacteristicsoffiveantigendetectingrapiddiagnostictestagrdtforsarscov2asymptomaticinfectionaheadtoheadbenchmarkcomparison AT ouchidan performancecharacteristicsoffiveantigendetectingrapiddiagnostictestagrdtforsarscov2asymptomaticinfectionaheadtoheadbenchmarkcomparison AT bordoyantonie performancecharacteristicsoffiveantigendetectingrapiddiagnostictestagrdtforsarscov2asymptomaticinfectionaheadtoheadbenchmarkcomparison AT sayaamaroemilion performancecharacteristicsoffiveantigendetectingrapiddiagnostictestagrdtforsarscov2asymptomaticinfectionaheadtoheadbenchmarkcomparison AT salsenchsergiv performancecharacteristicsoffiveantigendetectingrapiddiagnostictestagrdtforsarscov2asymptomaticinfectionaheadtoheadbenchmarkcomparison AT molinossonia performancecharacteristicsoffiveantigendetectingrapiddiagnostictestagrdtforsarscov2asymptomaticinfectionaheadtoheadbenchmarkcomparison AT alemanyandrea performancecharacteristicsoffiveantigendetectingrapiddiagnostictestagrdtforsarscov2asymptomaticinfectionaheadtoheadbenchmarkcomparison AT ubalsmaria performancecharacteristicsoffiveantigendetectingrapiddiagnostictestagrdtforsarscov2asymptomaticinfectionaheadtoheadbenchmarkcomparison AT corbachomonnemarc performancecharacteristicsoffiveantigendetectingrapiddiagnostictestagrdtforsarscov2asymptomaticinfectionaheadtoheadbenchmarkcomparison AT millatmartinezpere performancecharacteristicsoffiveantigendetectingrapiddiagnostictestagrdtforsarscov2asymptomaticinfectionaheadtoheadbenchmarkcomparison AT marksmichael performancecharacteristicsoffiveantigendetectingrapiddiagnostictestagrdtforsarscov2asymptomaticinfectionaheadtoheadbenchmarkcomparison AT clotetbonaventura performancecharacteristicsoffiveantigendetectingrapiddiagnostictestagrdtforsarscov2asymptomaticinfectionaheadtoheadbenchmarkcomparison AT pratnuria performancecharacteristicsoffiveantigendetectingrapiddiagnostictestagrdtforsarscov2asymptomaticinfectionaheadtoheadbenchmarkcomparison AT estradaoriol performancecharacteristicsoffiveantigendetectingrapiddiagnostictestagrdtforsarscov2asymptomaticinfectionaheadtoheadbenchmarkcomparison AT vilarmarc performancecharacteristicsoffiveantigendetectingrapiddiagnostictestagrdtforsarscov2asymptomaticinfectionaheadtoheadbenchmarkcomparison AT arajordi performancecharacteristicsoffiveantigendetectingrapiddiagnostictestagrdtforsarscov2asymptomaticinfectionaheadtoheadbenchmarkcomparison AT vallmayansmarti performancecharacteristicsoffiveantigendetectingrapiddiagnostictestagrdtforsarscov2asymptomaticinfectionaheadtoheadbenchmarkcomparison AT gbeirascamila performancecharacteristicsoffiveantigendetectingrapiddiagnostictestagrdtforsarscov2asymptomaticinfectionaheadtoheadbenchmarkcomparison AT bassatquique performancecharacteristicsoffiveantigendetectingrapiddiagnostictestagrdtforsarscov2asymptomaticinfectionaheadtoheadbenchmarkcomparison AT blancoignacio performancecharacteristicsoffiveantigendetectingrapiddiagnostictestagrdtforsarscov2asymptomaticinfectionaheadtoheadbenchmarkcomparison AT mitjaoriol performancecharacteristicsoffiveantigendetectingrapiddiagnostictestagrdtforsarscov2asymptomaticinfectionaheadtoheadbenchmarkcomparison |