Cargando…

Case of the week: Updating a cervical MR scan avoided unnecessary cervical surgery

BACKGROUND: As spinal surgeons, we have all likely seen cases in which lumbar disc herniations regressed/resolved on successive MR studies. Here, we present a patient whose original cervical MR showed a large C4-C5 cervical disc herniation that completely resolved on the follow-up MR obtained 9 mont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Epstein, Nancy E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8053477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33880239
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_931_2020
_version_ 1783680129000538112
author Epstein, Nancy E.
author_facet Epstein, Nancy E.
author_sort Epstein, Nancy E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As spinal surgeons, we have all likely seen cases in which lumbar disc herniations regressed/resolved on successive MR studies. Here, we present a patient whose original cervical MR showed a large C4-C5 cervical disc herniation that completely resolved on the follow-up MR obtained 9 months later, thus avoiding cervical surgery. CASE DESCRIPTION: A young patient (e.g. <30 years old) sustained multiple prior traumatic events over the past 3 years. The last episode 9 months ago resulted in the performance of an MR scan that demonstrated a significant central C4-C5 disc herniation with cord/root compression. Despite pain and mild radiculopathy, the patient had no focal neurological deficit, and did not undergo surgery. When the patient recently consulted multiple spinal orthopedists and neurosurgeons, the uniform recommendation was for a C4-C5 anterior cervical discectomy/ fusion (ACDF). However, a telemedicine consultation with a spinal neurosurgeon resulted in a follow-up cervical MR scan that demonstrated cervical disc resorption, and, therefore, no need for cervical surgical intervention. When the new study showed full resolution of the C4-C5 disc, the telemedicine and local neurosurgeon agreed that cervical surgery was unnecessary. CONCLUSION: The spinal literature shows that predominantly lumbar disc herniations (LDH) spontaneously regress on MR studies 34.7–95% of the time over 6–17 month intervals, with full resolution being seen in 43–75% of cases. As cervical disc herniations likely demonstrate similar resorption/resolution on successive MR studies, old cervical MR examinations should probably be updated/repeated in patients who are being considered for cervical surgical intervention. If/when cervical discs have resorbed, cervical surgery may be avoided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8053477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80534772021-04-19 Case of the week: Updating a cervical MR scan avoided unnecessary cervical surgery Epstein, Nancy E. Surg Neurol Int Case Report BACKGROUND: As spinal surgeons, we have all likely seen cases in which lumbar disc herniations regressed/resolved on successive MR studies. Here, we present a patient whose original cervical MR showed a large C4-C5 cervical disc herniation that completely resolved on the follow-up MR obtained 9 months later, thus avoiding cervical surgery. CASE DESCRIPTION: A young patient (e.g. <30 years old) sustained multiple prior traumatic events over the past 3 years. The last episode 9 months ago resulted in the performance of an MR scan that demonstrated a significant central C4-C5 disc herniation with cord/root compression. Despite pain and mild radiculopathy, the patient had no focal neurological deficit, and did not undergo surgery. When the patient recently consulted multiple spinal orthopedists and neurosurgeons, the uniform recommendation was for a C4-C5 anterior cervical discectomy/ fusion (ACDF). However, a telemedicine consultation with a spinal neurosurgeon resulted in a follow-up cervical MR scan that demonstrated cervical disc resorption, and, therefore, no need for cervical surgical intervention. When the new study showed full resolution of the C4-C5 disc, the telemedicine and local neurosurgeon agreed that cervical surgery was unnecessary. CONCLUSION: The spinal literature shows that predominantly lumbar disc herniations (LDH) spontaneously regress on MR studies 34.7–95% of the time over 6–17 month intervals, with full resolution being seen in 43–75% of cases. As cervical disc herniations likely demonstrate similar resorption/resolution on successive MR studies, old cervical MR examinations should probably be updated/repeated in patients who are being considered for cervical surgical intervention. If/when cervical discs have resorbed, cervical surgery may be avoided. Scientific Scholar 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8053477/ /pubmed/33880239 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_931_2020 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Surgical Neurology International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Case Report
Epstein, Nancy E.
Case of the week: Updating a cervical MR scan avoided unnecessary cervical surgery
title Case of the week: Updating a cervical MR scan avoided unnecessary cervical surgery
title_full Case of the week: Updating a cervical MR scan avoided unnecessary cervical surgery
title_fullStr Case of the week: Updating a cervical MR scan avoided unnecessary cervical surgery
title_full_unstemmed Case of the week: Updating a cervical MR scan avoided unnecessary cervical surgery
title_short Case of the week: Updating a cervical MR scan avoided unnecessary cervical surgery
title_sort case of the week: updating a cervical mr scan avoided unnecessary cervical surgery
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8053477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33880239
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_931_2020
work_keys_str_mv AT epsteinnancye caseoftheweekupdatingacervicalmrscanavoidedunnecessarycervicalsurgery