Cargando…
How machine learning is embedded to support clinician decision making: an analysis of FDA-approved medical devices
OBJECTIVE: To examine how and to what extent medical devices using machine learning (ML) support clinician decision making. METHODS: We searched for medical devices that were (1) approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) up till February 2020; (2) intended for use by clinicians; (3) in c...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8054073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33853863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100301 |
_version_ | 1783680231881572352 |
---|---|
author | Lyell, David Coiera, Enrico Chen, Jessica Shah, Parina Magrabi, Farah |
author_facet | Lyell, David Coiera, Enrico Chen, Jessica Shah, Parina Magrabi, Farah |
author_sort | Lyell, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To examine how and to what extent medical devices using machine learning (ML) support clinician decision making. METHODS: We searched for medical devices that were (1) approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) up till February 2020; (2) intended for use by clinicians; (3) in clinical tasks or decisions and (4) used ML. Descriptive information about the clinical task, device task, device input and output, and ML method were extracted. The stage of human information processing automated by ML-based devices and level of autonomy were assessed. RESULTS: Of 137 candidates, 59 FDA approvals for 49 unique devices were included. Most approvals (n=51) were since 2018. Devices commonly assisted with diagnostic (n=35) and triage (n=10) tasks. Twenty-three devices were assistive, providing decision support but left clinicians to make important decisions including diagnosis. Twelve automated the provision of information (autonomous information), such as quantification of heart ejection fraction, while 14 automatically provided task decisions like triaging the reading of scans according to suspected findings of stroke (autonomous decisions). Stages of human information processing most automated by devices were information analysis, (n=14) providing information as an input into clinician decision making, and decision selection (n=29), where devices provide a decision. CONCLUSION: Leveraging the benefits of ML algorithms to support clinicians while mitigating risks, requires a solid relationship between clinician and ML-based devices. Such relationships must be carefully designed, considering how algorithms are embedded in devices, the tasks supported, information provided and clinicians’ interactions with them. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8054073 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80540732021-04-28 How machine learning is embedded to support clinician decision making: an analysis of FDA-approved medical devices Lyell, David Coiera, Enrico Chen, Jessica Shah, Parina Magrabi, Farah BMJ Health Care Inform Original Research OBJECTIVE: To examine how and to what extent medical devices using machine learning (ML) support clinician decision making. METHODS: We searched for medical devices that were (1) approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) up till February 2020; (2) intended for use by clinicians; (3) in clinical tasks or decisions and (4) used ML. Descriptive information about the clinical task, device task, device input and output, and ML method were extracted. The stage of human information processing automated by ML-based devices and level of autonomy were assessed. RESULTS: Of 137 candidates, 59 FDA approvals for 49 unique devices were included. Most approvals (n=51) were since 2018. Devices commonly assisted with diagnostic (n=35) and triage (n=10) tasks. Twenty-three devices were assistive, providing decision support but left clinicians to make important decisions including diagnosis. Twelve automated the provision of information (autonomous information), such as quantification of heart ejection fraction, while 14 automatically provided task decisions like triaging the reading of scans according to suspected findings of stroke (autonomous decisions). Stages of human information processing most automated by devices were information analysis, (n=14) providing information as an input into clinician decision making, and decision selection (n=29), where devices provide a decision. CONCLUSION: Leveraging the benefits of ML algorithms to support clinicians while mitigating risks, requires a solid relationship between clinician and ML-based devices. Such relationships must be carefully designed, considering how algorithms are embedded in devices, the tasks supported, information provided and clinicians’ interactions with them. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8054073/ /pubmed/33853863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100301 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Lyell, David Coiera, Enrico Chen, Jessica Shah, Parina Magrabi, Farah How machine learning is embedded to support clinician decision making: an analysis of FDA-approved medical devices |
title | How machine learning is embedded to support clinician decision making: an analysis of FDA-approved medical devices |
title_full | How machine learning is embedded to support clinician decision making: an analysis of FDA-approved medical devices |
title_fullStr | How machine learning is embedded to support clinician decision making: an analysis of FDA-approved medical devices |
title_full_unstemmed | How machine learning is embedded to support clinician decision making: an analysis of FDA-approved medical devices |
title_short | How machine learning is embedded to support clinician decision making: an analysis of FDA-approved medical devices |
title_sort | how machine learning is embedded to support clinician decision making: an analysis of fda-approved medical devices |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8054073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33853863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100301 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lyelldavid howmachinelearningisembeddedtosupportcliniciandecisionmakingananalysisoffdaapprovedmedicaldevices AT coieraenrico howmachinelearningisembeddedtosupportcliniciandecisionmakingananalysisoffdaapprovedmedicaldevices AT chenjessica howmachinelearningisembeddedtosupportcliniciandecisionmakingananalysisoffdaapprovedmedicaldevices AT shahparina howmachinelearningisembeddedtosupportcliniciandecisionmakingananalysisoffdaapprovedmedicaldevices AT magrabifarah howmachinelearningisembeddedtosupportcliniciandecisionmakingananalysisoffdaapprovedmedicaldevices |