Cargando…

How machine learning is embedded to support clinician decision making: an analysis of FDA-approved medical devices

OBJECTIVE: To examine how and to what extent medical devices using machine learning (ML) support clinician decision making. METHODS: We searched for medical devices that were (1) approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) up till February 2020; (2) intended for use by clinicians; (3) in c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lyell, David, Coiera, Enrico, Chen, Jessica, Shah, Parina, Magrabi, Farah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8054073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33853863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100301
_version_ 1783680231881572352
author Lyell, David
Coiera, Enrico
Chen, Jessica
Shah, Parina
Magrabi, Farah
author_facet Lyell, David
Coiera, Enrico
Chen, Jessica
Shah, Parina
Magrabi, Farah
author_sort Lyell, David
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine how and to what extent medical devices using machine learning (ML) support clinician decision making. METHODS: We searched for medical devices that were (1) approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) up till February 2020; (2) intended for use by clinicians; (3) in clinical tasks or decisions and (4) used ML. Descriptive information about the clinical task, device task, device input and output, and ML method were extracted. The stage of human information processing automated by ML-based devices and level of autonomy were assessed. RESULTS: Of 137 candidates, 59 FDA approvals for 49 unique devices were included. Most approvals (n=51) were since 2018. Devices commonly assisted with diagnostic (n=35) and triage (n=10) tasks. Twenty-three devices were assistive, providing decision support but left clinicians to make important decisions including diagnosis. Twelve automated the provision of information (autonomous information), such as quantification of heart ejection fraction, while 14 automatically provided task decisions like triaging the reading of scans according to suspected findings of stroke (autonomous decisions). Stages of human information processing most automated by devices were information analysis, (n=14) providing information as an input into clinician decision making, and decision selection (n=29), where devices provide a decision. CONCLUSION: Leveraging the benefits of ML algorithms to support clinicians while mitigating risks, requires a solid relationship between clinician and ML-based devices. Such relationships must be carefully designed, considering how algorithms are embedded in devices, the tasks supported, information provided and clinicians’ interactions with them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8054073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80540732021-04-28 How machine learning is embedded to support clinician decision making: an analysis of FDA-approved medical devices Lyell, David Coiera, Enrico Chen, Jessica Shah, Parina Magrabi, Farah BMJ Health Care Inform Original Research OBJECTIVE: To examine how and to what extent medical devices using machine learning (ML) support clinician decision making. METHODS: We searched for medical devices that were (1) approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) up till February 2020; (2) intended for use by clinicians; (3) in clinical tasks or decisions and (4) used ML. Descriptive information about the clinical task, device task, device input and output, and ML method were extracted. The stage of human information processing automated by ML-based devices and level of autonomy were assessed. RESULTS: Of 137 candidates, 59 FDA approvals for 49 unique devices were included. Most approvals (n=51) were since 2018. Devices commonly assisted with diagnostic (n=35) and triage (n=10) tasks. Twenty-three devices were assistive, providing decision support but left clinicians to make important decisions including diagnosis. Twelve automated the provision of information (autonomous information), such as quantification of heart ejection fraction, while 14 automatically provided task decisions like triaging the reading of scans according to suspected findings of stroke (autonomous decisions). Stages of human information processing most automated by devices were information analysis, (n=14) providing information as an input into clinician decision making, and decision selection (n=29), where devices provide a decision. CONCLUSION: Leveraging the benefits of ML algorithms to support clinicians while mitigating risks, requires a solid relationship between clinician and ML-based devices. Such relationships must be carefully designed, considering how algorithms are embedded in devices, the tasks supported, information provided and clinicians’ interactions with them. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8054073/ /pubmed/33853863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100301 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Lyell, David
Coiera, Enrico
Chen, Jessica
Shah, Parina
Magrabi, Farah
How machine learning is embedded to support clinician decision making: an analysis of FDA-approved medical devices
title How machine learning is embedded to support clinician decision making: an analysis of FDA-approved medical devices
title_full How machine learning is embedded to support clinician decision making: an analysis of FDA-approved medical devices
title_fullStr How machine learning is embedded to support clinician decision making: an analysis of FDA-approved medical devices
title_full_unstemmed How machine learning is embedded to support clinician decision making: an analysis of FDA-approved medical devices
title_short How machine learning is embedded to support clinician decision making: an analysis of FDA-approved medical devices
title_sort how machine learning is embedded to support clinician decision making: an analysis of fda-approved medical devices
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8054073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33853863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100301
work_keys_str_mv AT lyelldavid howmachinelearningisembeddedtosupportcliniciandecisionmakingananalysisoffdaapprovedmedicaldevices
AT coieraenrico howmachinelearningisembeddedtosupportcliniciandecisionmakingananalysisoffdaapprovedmedicaldevices
AT chenjessica howmachinelearningisembeddedtosupportcliniciandecisionmakingananalysisoffdaapprovedmedicaldevices
AT shahparina howmachinelearningisembeddedtosupportcliniciandecisionmakingananalysisoffdaapprovedmedicaldevices
AT magrabifarah howmachinelearningisembeddedtosupportcliniciandecisionmakingananalysisoffdaapprovedmedicaldevices