Cargando…

Minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for Mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (UK Mini Mitral)

INTRODUCTION: Numbers of patients undergoing mitral valve repair (MVr) surgery for severe mitral regurgitation have grown and will continue to rise. MVr is routinely performed via median sternotomy; however, there is a move towards less invasive surgical approaches. There is debate within the clinic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maier, Rebecca H, Kasim, Adetayo S, Zacharias, Joseph, Vale, Luke, Graham, Richard, Walker, Antony, Laskawski, Grzegorz, Deshpande, Ranjit, Goodwin, Andrew, Kendall, Simon, Murphy, Gavin J, Zamvar, Vipin, Pessotto, Renzo, Lloyd, Clinton, Dalrymple-Hay, Malcolm, Casula, Roberto, Vohra, Hunaid A, Ciulli, Franco, Caputo, Massimo, Stoica, Serban, Baghai, Max, Niranjan, Gunaratnam, Punjabi, Prakash P, Wendler, Olaf, Marsay, Leanne, Fernandez-Garcia, Cristina, Modi, Paul, Kirmani, Bilal H, Pullan, Mark D, Muir, Andrew D, Pousios, Dimitrios, Hancock, Helen C, Akowuah, Enoch
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8054102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33853807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047676
_version_ 1783680237949681664
author Maier, Rebecca H
Kasim, Adetayo S
Zacharias, Joseph
Vale, Luke
Graham, Richard
Walker, Antony
Laskawski, Grzegorz
Deshpande, Ranjit
Goodwin, Andrew
Kendall, Simon
Murphy, Gavin J
Zamvar, Vipin
Pessotto, Renzo
Lloyd, Clinton
Dalrymple-Hay, Malcolm
Casula, Roberto
Vohra, Hunaid A
Ciulli, Franco
Caputo, Massimo
Stoica, Serban
Baghai, Max
Niranjan, Gunaratnam
Punjabi, Prakash P
Wendler, Olaf
Marsay, Leanne
Fernandez-Garcia, Cristina
Modi, Paul
Kirmani, Bilal H
Pullan, Mark D
Muir, Andrew D
Pousios, Dimitrios
Hancock, Helen C
Akowuah, Enoch
author_facet Maier, Rebecca H
Kasim, Adetayo S
Zacharias, Joseph
Vale, Luke
Graham, Richard
Walker, Antony
Laskawski, Grzegorz
Deshpande, Ranjit
Goodwin, Andrew
Kendall, Simon
Murphy, Gavin J
Zamvar, Vipin
Pessotto, Renzo
Lloyd, Clinton
Dalrymple-Hay, Malcolm
Casula, Roberto
Vohra, Hunaid A
Ciulli, Franco
Caputo, Massimo
Stoica, Serban
Baghai, Max
Niranjan, Gunaratnam
Punjabi, Prakash P
Wendler, Olaf
Marsay, Leanne
Fernandez-Garcia, Cristina
Modi, Paul
Kirmani, Bilal H
Pullan, Mark D
Muir, Andrew D
Pousios, Dimitrios
Hancock, Helen C
Akowuah, Enoch
author_sort Maier, Rebecca H
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Numbers of patients undergoing mitral valve repair (MVr) surgery for severe mitral regurgitation have grown and will continue to rise. MVr is routinely performed via median sternotomy; however, there is a move towards less invasive surgical approaches. There is debate within the clinical and National Health Service (NHS) commissioning community about widespread adoption of minimally invasive MVr surgery in the absence of robust research evidence; implementation requires investment in staff and infrastructure. The UK Mini Mitral trial will provide definitive evidence comparing patient, NHS and clinical outcomes in adult patients undergoing MVr surgery. It will establish the best surgical approach for MVr, setting a standard against which emerging percutaneous techniques can be measured. Findings will inform optimisation of cost-effective practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: UK Mini Mitral is a multicentre, expertise based randomised controlled trial of minimally invasive thoracoscopically guided right minithoracotomy versus conventional sternotomy for MVr. The trial is taking place in NHS cardiothoracic centres in the UK with established minimally invasive mitral valve surgery programmes. In each centre, consenting and eligible patients are randomised to receive surgery performed by consultant surgeons who meet protocol-defined surgical expertise criteria. Patients are followed for 1 year, and consent to longer term follow-up. Primary outcome is physical functioning 12 weeks following surgery, measured by change in Short Form Health Survey (SF-36v2) physical functioning scale. Early and 1 year echo data will be reported by a core laboratory. Estimates of key clinical and health economic outcomes will be reported up to 5 years. The primary economic outcome is cost effectiveness, measured as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained over 52 weeks following index surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: A favourable opinion was given by Wales REC 6 (16/WA/0156). Trial findings will be disseminated to patients, clinicians, commissioning groups and through peer reviewed publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13930454.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8054102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80541022021-04-28 Minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for Mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (UK Mini Mitral) Maier, Rebecca H Kasim, Adetayo S Zacharias, Joseph Vale, Luke Graham, Richard Walker, Antony Laskawski, Grzegorz Deshpande, Ranjit Goodwin, Andrew Kendall, Simon Murphy, Gavin J Zamvar, Vipin Pessotto, Renzo Lloyd, Clinton Dalrymple-Hay, Malcolm Casula, Roberto Vohra, Hunaid A Ciulli, Franco Caputo, Massimo Stoica, Serban Baghai, Max Niranjan, Gunaratnam Punjabi, Prakash P Wendler, Olaf Marsay, Leanne Fernandez-Garcia, Cristina Modi, Paul Kirmani, Bilal H Pullan, Mark D Muir, Andrew D Pousios, Dimitrios Hancock, Helen C Akowuah, Enoch BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Numbers of patients undergoing mitral valve repair (MVr) surgery for severe mitral regurgitation have grown and will continue to rise. MVr is routinely performed via median sternotomy; however, there is a move towards less invasive surgical approaches. There is debate within the clinical and National Health Service (NHS) commissioning community about widespread adoption of minimally invasive MVr surgery in the absence of robust research evidence; implementation requires investment in staff and infrastructure. The UK Mini Mitral trial will provide definitive evidence comparing patient, NHS and clinical outcomes in adult patients undergoing MVr surgery. It will establish the best surgical approach for MVr, setting a standard against which emerging percutaneous techniques can be measured. Findings will inform optimisation of cost-effective practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: UK Mini Mitral is a multicentre, expertise based randomised controlled trial of minimally invasive thoracoscopically guided right minithoracotomy versus conventional sternotomy for MVr. The trial is taking place in NHS cardiothoracic centres in the UK with established minimally invasive mitral valve surgery programmes. In each centre, consenting and eligible patients are randomised to receive surgery performed by consultant surgeons who meet protocol-defined surgical expertise criteria. Patients are followed for 1 year, and consent to longer term follow-up. Primary outcome is physical functioning 12 weeks following surgery, measured by change in Short Form Health Survey (SF-36v2) physical functioning scale. Early and 1 year echo data will be reported by a core laboratory. Estimates of key clinical and health economic outcomes will be reported up to 5 years. The primary economic outcome is cost effectiveness, measured as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained over 52 weeks following index surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: A favourable opinion was given by Wales REC 6 (16/WA/0156). Trial findings will be disseminated to patients, clinicians, commissioning groups and through peer reviewed publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13930454. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8054102/ /pubmed/33853807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047676 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Surgery
Maier, Rebecca H
Kasim, Adetayo S
Zacharias, Joseph
Vale, Luke
Graham, Richard
Walker, Antony
Laskawski, Grzegorz
Deshpande, Ranjit
Goodwin, Andrew
Kendall, Simon
Murphy, Gavin J
Zamvar, Vipin
Pessotto, Renzo
Lloyd, Clinton
Dalrymple-Hay, Malcolm
Casula, Roberto
Vohra, Hunaid A
Ciulli, Franco
Caputo, Massimo
Stoica, Serban
Baghai, Max
Niranjan, Gunaratnam
Punjabi, Prakash P
Wendler, Olaf
Marsay, Leanne
Fernandez-Garcia, Cristina
Modi, Paul
Kirmani, Bilal H
Pullan, Mark D
Muir, Andrew D
Pousios, Dimitrios
Hancock, Helen C
Akowuah, Enoch
Minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for Mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (UK Mini Mitral)
title Minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for Mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (UK Mini Mitral)
title_full Minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for Mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (UK Mini Mitral)
title_fullStr Minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for Mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (UK Mini Mitral)
title_full_unstemmed Minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for Mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (UK Mini Mitral)
title_short Minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for Mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (UK Mini Mitral)
title_sort minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (uk mini mitral)
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8054102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33853807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047676
work_keys_str_mv AT maierrebeccah minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT kasimadetayos minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT zachariasjoseph minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT valeluke minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT grahamrichard minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT walkerantony minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT laskawskigrzegorz minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT deshpanderanjit minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT goodwinandrew minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT kendallsimon minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT murphygavinj minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT zamvarvipin minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT pessottorenzo minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT lloydclinton minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT dalrymplehaymalcolm minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT casularoberto minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT vohrahunaida minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT ciullifranco minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT caputomassimo minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT stoicaserban minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT baghaimax minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT niranjangunaratnam minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT punjabiprakashp minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT wendlerolaf minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT marsayleanne minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT fernandezgarciacristina minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT modipaul minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT kirmanibilalh minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT pullanmarkd minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT muirandrewd minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT pousiosdimitrios minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT hancockhelenc minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral
AT akowuahenoch minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral