Cargando…
Minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for Mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (UK Mini Mitral)
INTRODUCTION: Numbers of patients undergoing mitral valve repair (MVr) surgery for severe mitral regurgitation have grown and will continue to rise. MVr is routinely performed via median sternotomy; however, there is a move towards less invasive surgical approaches. There is debate within the clinic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8054102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33853807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047676 |
_version_ | 1783680237949681664 |
---|---|
author | Maier, Rebecca H Kasim, Adetayo S Zacharias, Joseph Vale, Luke Graham, Richard Walker, Antony Laskawski, Grzegorz Deshpande, Ranjit Goodwin, Andrew Kendall, Simon Murphy, Gavin J Zamvar, Vipin Pessotto, Renzo Lloyd, Clinton Dalrymple-Hay, Malcolm Casula, Roberto Vohra, Hunaid A Ciulli, Franco Caputo, Massimo Stoica, Serban Baghai, Max Niranjan, Gunaratnam Punjabi, Prakash P Wendler, Olaf Marsay, Leanne Fernandez-Garcia, Cristina Modi, Paul Kirmani, Bilal H Pullan, Mark D Muir, Andrew D Pousios, Dimitrios Hancock, Helen C Akowuah, Enoch |
author_facet | Maier, Rebecca H Kasim, Adetayo S Zacharias, Joseph Vale, Luke Graham, Richard Walker, Antony Laskawski, Grzegorz Deshpande, Ranjit Goodwin, Andrew Kendall, Simon Murphy, Gavin J Zamvar, Vipin Pessotto, Renzo Lloyd, Clinton Dalrymple-Hay, Malcolm Casula, Roberto Vohra, Hunaid A Ciulli, Franco Caputo, Massimo Stoica, Serban Baghai, Max Niranjan, Gunaratnam Punjabi, Prakash P Wendler, Olaf Marsay, Leanne Fernandez-Garcia, Cristina Modi, Paul Kirmani, Bilal H Pullan, Mark D Muir, Andrew D Pousios, Dimitrios Hancock, Helen C Akowuah, Enoch |
author_sort | Maier, Rebecca H |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Numbers of patients undergoing mitral valve repair (MVr) surgery for severe mitral regurgitation have grown and will continue to rise. MVr is routinely performed via median sternotomy; however, there is a move towards less invasive surgical approaches. There is debate within the clinical and National Health Service (NHS) commissioning community about widespread adoption of minimally invasive MVr surgery in the absence of robust research evidence; implementation requires investment in staff and infrastructure. The UK Mini Mitral trial will provide definitive evidence comparing patient, NHS and clinical outcomes in adult patients undergoing MVr surgery. It will establish the best surgical approach for MVr, setting a standard against which emerging percutaneous techniques can be measured. Findings will inform optimisation of cost-effective practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: UK Mini Mitral is a multicentre, expertise based randomised controlled trial of minimally invasive thoracoscopically guided right minithoracotomy versus conventional sternotomy for MVr. The trial is taking place in NHS cardiothoracic centres in the UK with established minimally invasive mitral valve surgery programmes. In each centre, consenting and eligible patients are randomised to receive surgery performed by consultant surgeons who meet protocol-defined surgical expertise criteria. Patients are followed for 1 year, and consent to longer term follow-up. Primary outcome is physical functioning 12 weeks following surgery, measured by change in Short Form Health Survey (SF-36v2) physical functioning scale. Early and 1 year echo data will be reported by a core laboratory. Estimates of key clinical and health economic outcomes will be reported up to 5 years. The primary economic outcome is cost effectiveness, measured as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained over 52 weeks following index surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: A favourable opinion was given by Wales REC 6 (16/WA/0156). Trial findings will be disseminated to patients, clinicians, commissioning groups and through peer reviewed publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13930454. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8054102 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80541022021-04-28 Minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for Mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (UK Mini Mitral) Maier, Rebecca H Kasim, Adetayo S Zacharias, Joseph Vale, Luke Graham, Richard Walker, Antony Laskawski, Grzegorz Deshpande, Ranjit Goodwin, Andrew Kendall, Simon Murphy, Gavin J Zamvar, Vipin Pessotto, Renzo Lloyd, Clinton Dalrymple-Hay, Malcolm Casula, Roberto Vohra, Hunaid A Ciulli, Franco Caputo, Massimo Stoica, Serban Baghai, Max Niranjan, Gunaratnam Punjabi, Prakash P Wendler, Olaf Marsay, Leanne Fernandez-Garcia, Cristina Modi, Paul Kirmani, Bilal H Pullan, Mark D Muir, Andrew D Pousios, Dimitrios Hancock, Helen C Akowuah, Enoch BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Numbers of patients undergoing mitral valve repair (MVr) surgery for severe mitral regurgitation have grown and will continue to rise. MVr is routinely performed via median sternotomy; however, there is a move towards less invasive surgical approaches. There is debate within the clinical and National Health Service (NHS) commissioning community about widespread adoption of minimally invasive MVr surgery in the absence of robust research evidence; implementation requires investment in staff and infrastructure. The UK Mini Mitral trial will provide definitive evidence comparing patient, NHS and clinical outcomes in adult patients undergoing MVr surgery. It will establish the best surgical approach for MVr, setting a standard against which emerging percutaneous techniques can be measured. Findings will inform optimisation of cost-effective practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: UK Mini Mitral is a multicentre, expertise based randomised controlled trial of minimally invasive thoracoscopically guided right minithoracotomy versus conventional sternotomy for MVr. The trial is taking place in NHS cardiothoracic centres in the UK with established minimally invasive mitral valve surgery programmes. In each centre, consenting and eligible patients are randomised to receive surgery performed by consultant surgeons who meet protocol-defined surgical expertise criteria. Patients are followed for 1 year, and consent to longer term follow-up. Primary outcome is physical functioning 12 weeks following surgery, measured by change in Short Form Health Survey (SF-36v2) physical functioning scale. Early and 1 year echo data will be reported by a core laboratory. Estimates of key clinical and health economic outcomes will be reported up to 5 years. The primary economic outcome is cost effectiveness, measured as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained over 52 weeks following index surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: A favourable opinion was given by Wales REC 6 (16/WA/0156). Trial findings will be disseminated to patients, clinicians, commissioning groups and through peer reviewed publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13930454. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8054102/ /pubmed/33853807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047676 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Maier, Rebecca H Kasim, Adetayo S Zacharias, Joseph Vale, Luke Graham, Richard Walker, Antony Laskawski, Grzegorz Deshpande, Ranjit Goodwin, Andrew Kendall, Simon Murphy, Gavin J Zamvar, Vipin Pessotto, Renzo Lloyd, Clinton Dalrymple-Hay, Malcolm Casula, Roberto Vohra, Hunaid A Ciulli, Franco Caputo, Massimo Stoica, Serban Baghai, Max Niranjan, Gunaratnam Punjabi, Prakash P Wendler, Olaf Marsay, Leanne Fernandez-Garcia, Cristina Modi, Paul Kirmani, Bilal H Pullan, Mark D Muir, Andrew D Pousios, Dimitrios Hancock, Helen C Akowuah, Enoch Minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for Mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (UK Mini Mitral) |
title | Minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for Mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (UK Mini Mitral) |
title_full | Minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for Mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (UK Mini Mitral) |
title_fullStr | Minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for Mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (UK Mini Mitral) |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for Mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (UK Mini Mitral) |
title_short | Minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for Mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (UK Mini Mitral) |
title_sort | minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (uk mini mitral) |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8054102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33853807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047676 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maierrebeccah minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT kasimadetayos minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT zachariasjoseph minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT valeluke minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT grahamrichard minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT walkerantony minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT laskawskigrzegorz minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT deshpanderanjit minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT goodwinandrew minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT kendallsimon minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT murphygavinj minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT zamvarvipin minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT pessottorenzo minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT lloydclinton minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT dalrymplehaymalcolm minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT casularoberto minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT vohrahunaida minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT ciullifranco minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT caputomassimo minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT stoicaserban minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT baghaimax minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT niranjangunaratnam minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT punjabiprakashp minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT wendlerolaf minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT marsayleanne minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT fernandezgarciacristina minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT modipaul minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT kirmanibilalh minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT pullanmarkd minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT muirandrewd minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT pousiosdimitrios minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT hancockhelenc minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral AT akowuahenoch minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalsternotomyformitralvalverepairprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialukminimitral |