Cargando…

Development of national physical activity recommendations in 18 EU member states: a comparison of methodologies and the use of evidence

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study is to compare how member states of the European Union (EU) develop their national physical activity (PA) recommendations and to provide an overview of the methodologies they apply in doing so. Information was collected directly from the physical activity focal points...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tcymbal, Antonina, Gelius, Peter, Abu-Omar, Karim, Foster, Charlie, Whiting, Stephen, Mendes, Romeu, Titze, Sylvia, Dorner, Thomas Ernst, Halbwachs, Christian, Duclos, Martine, Toussaint, Jean-Francois, Wendel-Vos, Wanda, Baxter, Beelin, Ferschl, Susanne, Breda, Joao Joaquim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8054104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33858863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041710
_version_ 1783680238423638016
author Tcymbal, Antonina
Gelius, Peter
Abu-Omar, Karim
Foster, Charlie
Whiting, Stephen
Mendes, Romeu
Titze, Sylvia
Dorner, Thomas Ernst
Halbwachs, Christian
Duclos, Martine
Toussaint, Jean-Francois
Wendel-Vos, Wanda
Baxter, Beelin
Ferschl, Susanne
Breda, Joao Joaquim
author_facet Tcymbal, Antonina
Gelius, Peter
Abu-Omar, Karim
Foster, Charlie
Whiting, Stephen
Mendes, Romeu
Titze, Sylvia
Dorner, Thomas Ernst
Halbwachs, Christian
Duclos, Martine
Toussaint, Jean-Francois
Wendel-Vos, Wanda
Baxter, Beelin
Ferschl, Susanne
Breda, Joao Joaquim
author_sort Tcymbal, Antonina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study is to compare how member states of the European Union (EU) develop their national physical activity (PA) recommendations and to provide an overview of the methodologies they apply in doing so. Information was collected directly from the physical activity focal points of EU member states in 2018. Five countries were chosen for detailed case study analysis of development processes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: The representatives of the 28 EU member state governments to the EU physical activity Focal Point Network. OUTCOME MEASURES: From national documents we extracted data on (1) the participants of the development process, (2) the different methods used during development, and (3) on which sources national PA recommendations were based. An additional survey for case study countries provided details on (1) anonymised information on the participants of development process, (2) methods employed and rationale for choosing them, (3) development process and timeline, and (4) main source documents used for recommendation development. RESULTS: Eighteen national documents on PA recommendations contained information about development process. The results showed that countries used different approaches to develop national recommendations. The main strategies were (1) adoption of WHO 2010 recommendations or (2) a combination of analysis and adoption of other national and international recommendations and literature review. All of the five case study countries relied on review processes rather than directly adopting WHO recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: While there are arguments for the use of particular strategies for PA recommendation development, there is currently no evidence for the general superiority of a specific approach. Instead, our findings highlight the broad spectrum of potential development methods, resources utilisation and final recommendations design currently available to national governments. These results may be a source of inspiration for other countries currently planning the development or update of national PA recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8054104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80541042021-04-28 Development of national physical activity recommendations in 18 EU member states: a comparison of methodologies and the use of evidence Tcymbal, Antonina Gelius, Peter Abu-Omar, Karim Foster, Charlie Whiting, Stephen Mendes, Romeu Titze, Sylvia Dorner, Thomas Ernst Halbwachs, Christian Duclos, Martine Toussaint, Jean-Francois Wendel-Vos, Wanda Baxter, Beelin Ferschl, Susanne Breda, Joao Joaquim BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study is to compare how member states of the European Union (EU) develop their national physical activity (PA) recommendations and to provide an overview of the methodologies they apply in doing so. Information was collected directly from the physical activity focal points of EU member states in 2018. Five countries were chosen for detailed case study analysis of development processes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: The representatives of the 28 EU member state governments to the EU physical activity Focal Point Network. OUTCOME MEASURES: From national documents we extracted data on (1) the participants of the development process, (2) the different methods used during development, and (3) on which sources national PA recommendations were based. An additional survey for case study countries provided details on (1) anonymised information on the participants of development process, (2) methods employed and rationale for choosing them, (3) development process and timeline, and (4) main source documents used for recommendation development. RESULTS: Eighteen national documents on PA recommendations contained information about development process. The results showed that countries used different approaches to develop national recommendations. The main strategies were (1) adoption of WHO 2010 recommendations or (2) a combination of analysis and adoption of other national and international recommendations and literature review. All of the five case study countries relied on review processes rather than directly adopting WHO recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: While there are arguments for the use of particular strategies for PA recommendation development, there is currently no evidence for the general superiority of a specific approach. Instead, our findings highlight the broad spectrum of potential development methods, resources utilisation and final recommendations design currently available to national governments. These results may be a source of inspiration for other countries currently planning the development or update of national PA recommendations. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8054104/ /pubmed/33858863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041710 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Policy
Tcymbal, Antonina
Gelius, Peter
Abu-Omar, Karim
Foster, Charlie
Whiting, Stephen
Mendes, Romeu
Titze, Sylvia
Dorner, Thomas Ernst
Halbwachs, Christian
Duclos, Martine
Toussaint, Jean-Francois
Wendel-Vos, Wanda
Baxter, Beelin
Ferschl, Susanne
Breda, Joao Joaquim
Development of national physical activity recommendations in 18 EU member states: a comparison of methodologies and the use of evidence
title Development of national physical activity recommendations in 18 EU member states: a comparison of methodologies and the use of evidence
title_full Development of national physical activity recommendations in 18 EU member states: a comparison of methodologies and the use of evidence
title_fullStr Development of national physical activity recommendations in 18 EU member states: a comparison of methodologies and the use of evidence
title_full_unstemmed Development of national physical activity recommendations in 18 EU member states: a comparison of methodologies and the use of evidence
title_short Development of national physical activity recommendations in 18 EU member states: a comparison of methodologies and the use of evidence
title_sort development of national physical activity recommendations in 18 eu member states: a comparison of methodologies and the use of evidence
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8054104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33858863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041710
work_keys_str_mv AT tcymbalantonina developmentofnationalphysicalactivityrecommendationsin18eumemberstatesacomparisonofmethodologiesandtheuseofevidence
AT geliuspeter developmentofnationalphysicalactivityrecommendationsin18eumemberstatesacomparisonofmethodologiesandtheuseofevidence
AT abuomarkarim developmentofnationalphysicalactivityrecommendationsin18eumemberstatesacomparisonofmethodologiesandtheuseofevidence
AT fostercharlie developmentofnationalphysicalactivityrecommendationsin18eumemberstatesacomparisonofmethodologiesandtheuseofevidence
AT whitingstephen developmentofnationalphysicalactivityrecommendationsin18eumemberstatesacomparisonofmethodologiesandtheuseofevidence
AT mendesromeu developmentofnationalphysicalactivityrecommendationsin18eumemberstatesacomparisonofmethodologiesandtheuseofevidence
AT titzesylvia developmentofnationalphysicalactivityrecommendationsin18eumemberstatesacomparisonofmethodologiesandtheuseofevidence
AT dornerthomasernst developmentofnationalphysicalactivityrecommendationsin18eumemberstatesacomparisonofmethodologiesandtheuseofevidence
AT halbwachschristian developmentofnationalphysicalactivityrecommendationsin18eumemberstatesacomparisonofmethodologiesandtheuseofevidence
AT duclosmartine developmentofnationalphysicalactivityrecommendationsin18eumemberstatesacomparisonofmethodologiesandtheuseofevidence
AT toussaintjeanfrancois developmentofnationalphysicalactivityrecommendationsin18eumemberstatesacomparisonofmethodologiesandtheuseofevidence
AT wendelvoswanda developmentofnationalphysicalactivityrecommendationsin18eumemberstatesacomparisonofmethodologiesandtheuseofevidence
AT baxterbeelin developmentofnationalphysicalactivityrecommendationsin18eumemberstatesacomparisonofmethodologiesandtheuseofevidence
AT ferschlsusanne developmentofnationalphysicalactivityrecommendationsin18eumemberstatesacomparisonofmethodologiesandtheuseofevidence
AT bredajoaojoaquim developmentofnationalphysicalactivityrecommendationsin18eumemberstatesacomparisonofmethodologiesandtheuseofevidence