Cargando…
Provider variability in the intraoperative use of neuromuscular blocking agents: a retrospective multicentre cohort study
OBJECTIVE: To assess variability in the intraoperative use of non-depolarising neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) across individual anaesthesia providers, surgeons and hospitals. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Two major tertiary referral centres, Boston, Massachusetts,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8054197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33853808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048509 |
_version_ | 1783680257025376256 |
---|---|
author | Althoff, Friederike C Xu, Xinling Wachtendorf, Luca J Shay, Denys Patrocinio, Maria Schaefer, Maximilian S Houle, Timothy T Fassbender, Philipp Eikermann, Matthias Wongtangman, Karuna |
author_facet | Althoff, Friederike C Xu, Xinling Wachtendorf, Luca J Shay, Denys Patrocinio, Maria Schaefer, Maximilian S Houle, Timothy T Fassbender, Philipp Eikermann, Matthias Wongtangman, Karuna |
author_sort | Althoff, Friederike C |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess variability in the intraoperative use of non-depolarising neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) across individual anaesthesia providers, surgeons and hospitals. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Two major tertiary referral centres, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. PARTICIPANTS: 265 537 adult participants undergoing non-cardiac surgery between October 2005 and September 2017. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We analysed the variances in NMBA use across 958 anaesthesia and 623 surgical providers, across anaesthesia provider types (anaesthesia residents, certified registered nurse anaesthetists, attendings) and across hospitals using multivariable-adjusted mixed effects logistic regression. Intraclass correlations (ICC) were calculated to further quantify the variability in NMBA use that was unexplained by other covariates. Procedure-specific subgroup analyses were performed. RESULTS: NMBAs were used in 183 242 (69%) surgical cases. Variances in NMBA use were significantly higher among individual surgeons than among anaesthesia providers (variance 1.32 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.60) vs 0.24 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.28), p<0.001). Procedure-specific subgroup analysis of hernia repairs, spine surgeries and mastectomies confirmed our findings: the total variance in NMBA use that was unexplained by the covariate model was higher for surgeons versus anaesthesia providers (ICC 37.0% vs 13.0%, 69.7% vs 25.5%, 69.8% vs 19.5%, respectively; p<0.001). Variances in NMBA use were also partially explained by the anaesthesia provider’s hospital network (Massachusetts General Hospital: variance 0.35 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.43) vs Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center: 0.15 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.19); p<0.001). Across provider types, surgeons showed the highest variance, and anaesthesia residents showed the lowest variance in NMBA use. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variability across individual surgeons and anaesthesia providers and institutions in the use of NMBAs, which could not sufficiently be explained by a large number of patient-related and procedure-related characteristics, but may instead be driven by preference. Surgeons may have a stronger influence on a key aspect of anaesthesia management than anticipated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8054197 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80541972021-04-28 Provider variability in the intraoperative use of neuromuscular blocking agents: a retrospective multicentre cohort study Althoff, Friederike C Xu, Xinling Wachtendorf, Luca J Shay, Denys Patrocinio, Maria Schaefer, Maximilian S Houle, Timothy T Fassbender, Philipp Eikermann, Matthias Wongtangman, Karuna BMJ Open Anaesthesia OBJECTIVE: To assess variability in the intraoperative use of non-depolarising neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) across individual anaesthesia providers, surgeons and hospitals. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Two major tertiary referral centres, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. PARTICIPANTS: 265 537 adult participants undergoing non-cardiac surgery between October 2005 and September 2017. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We analysed the variances in NMBA use across 958 anaesthesia and 623 surgical providers, across anaesthesia provider types (anaesthesia residents, certified registered nurse anaesthetists, attendings) and across hospitals using multivariable-adjusted mixed effects logistic regression. Intraclass correlations (ICC) were calculated to further quantify the variability in NMBA use that was unexplained by other covariates. Procedure-specific subgroup analyses were performed. RESULTS: NMBAs were used in 183 242 (69%) surgical cases. Variances in NMBA use were significantly higher among individual surgeons than among anaesthesia providers (variance 1.32 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.60) vs 0.24 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.28), p<0.001). Procedure-specific subgroup analysis of hernia repairs, spine surgeries and mastectomies confirmed our findings: the total variance in NMBA use that was unexplained by the covariate model was higher for surgeons versus anaesthesia providers (ICC 37.0% vs 13.0%, 69.7% vs 25.5%, 69.8% vs 19.5%, respectively; p<0.001). Variances in NMBA use were also partially explained by the anaesthesia provider’s hospital network (Massachusetts General Hospital: variance 0.35 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.43) vs Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center: 0.15 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.19); p<0.001). Across provider types, surgeons showed the highest variance, and anaesthesia residents showed the lowest variance in NMBA use. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variability across individual surgeons and anaesthesia providers and institutions in the use of NMBAs, which could not sufficiently be explained by a large number of patient-related and procedure-related characteristics, but may instead be driven by preference. Surgeons may have a stronger influence on a key aspect of anaesthesia management than anticipated. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8054197/ /pubmed/33853808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048509 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Anaesthesia Althoff, Friederike C Xu, Xinling Wachtendorf, Luca J Shay, Denys Patrocinio, Maria Schaefer, Maximilian S Houle, Timothy T Fassbender, Philipp Eikermann, Matthias Wongtangman, Karuna Provider variability in the intraoperative use of neuromuscular blocking agents: a retrospective multicentre cohort study |
title | Provider variability in the intraoperative use of neuromuscular blocking agents: a retrospective multicentre cohort study |
title_full | Provider variability in the intraoperative use of neuromuscular blocking agents: a retrospective multicentre cohort study |
title_fullStr | Provider variability in the intraoperative use of neuromuscular blocking agents: a retrospective multicentre cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Provider variability in the intraoperative use of neuromuscular blocking agents: a retrospective multicentre cohort study |
title_short | Provider variability in the intraoperative use of neuromuscular blocking agents: a retrospective multicentre cohort study |
title_sort | provider variability in the intraoperative use of neuromuscular blocking agents: a retrospective multicentre cohort study |
topic | Anaesthesia |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8054197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33853808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048509 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT althofffriederikec providervariabilityintheintraoperativeuseofneuromuscularblockingagentsaretrospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT xuxinling providervariabilityintheintraoperativeuseofneuromuscularblockingagentsaretrospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT wachtendorflucaj providervariabilityintheintraoperativeuseofneuromuscularblockingagentsaretrospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT shaydenys providervariabilityintheintraoperativeuseofneuromuscularblockingagentsaretrospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT patrociniomaria providervariabilityintheintraoperativeuseofneuromuscularblockingagentsaretrospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT schaefermaximilians providervariabilityintheintraoperativeuseofneuromuscularblockingagentsaretrospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT houletimothyt providervariabilityintheintraoperativeuseofneuromuscularblockingagentsaretrospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT fassbenderphilipp providervariabilityintheintraoperativeuseofneuromuscularblockingagentsaretrospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT eikermannmatthias providervariabilityintheintraoperativeuseofneuromuscularblockingagentsaretrospectivemulticentrecohortstudy AT wongtangmankaruna providervariabilityintheintraoperativeuseofneuromuscularblockingagentsaretrospectivemulticentrecohortstudy |