Cargando…
Induction of labour during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national survey of impact on practice in the UK
BACKGROUND: Induction of labour (IOL) is one of the most commonly performed interventions in maternity care, with outpatient cervical ripening increasingly offered as an option for women undergoing IOL. The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the context of practice and the option of returning home for ce...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8054234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33874913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03781-x |
_version_ | 1783680261699928064 |
---|---|
author | Harkness, M. Yuill, C. Cheyne, H. Stock, S. J. McCourt, C. |
author_facet | Harkness, M. Yuill, C. Cheyne, H. Stock, S. J. McCourt, C. |
author_sort | Harkness, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Induction of labour (IOL) is one of the most commonly performed interventions in maternity care, with outpatient cervical ripening increasingly offered as an option for women undergoing IOL. The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the context of practice and the option of returning home for cervical ripening may now assume greater significance. This work aimed to examine whether and how the COVID-19 pandemic has changed practice around IOL in the UK. METHOD: We used an online questionnaire to survey senior obstetricians and midwives at all 156 UK NHS Trusts and Boards that currently offer maternity services. Responses were analysed to produce descriptive statistics, with free text responses analysed using a conventional content analysis approach. FINDINGS: Responses were received from 92 of 156 UK Trusts and Boards, a 59% response rate. Many Trusts and Boards reported no change to their IOL practice, however 23% reported change in methods used for cervical ripening; 28% a change in criteria for home cervical ripening; 28% stated that more women were returning home during cervical ripening; and 24% noted changes to women’s response to recommendations for IOL. Much of the change was reported as happening in response to attempts to minimise hospital attendance and restrictions on birth partners accompanying women. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic has changed practice around induction of labour, although this varied significantly between NHS Trusts and Boards. There is a lack of formal evidence to support decision-making around outpatient cervical ripening: the basis on which changes were implemented and what evidence was used to inform decisions is not clear. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8054234 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80542342021-04-19 Induction of labour during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national survey of impact on practice in the UK Harkness, M. Yuill, C. Cheyne, H. Stock, S. J. McCourt, C. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Induction of labour (IOL) is one of the most commonly performed interventions in maternity care, with outpatient cervical ripening increasingly offered as an option for women undergoing IOL. The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the context of practice and the option of returning home for cervical ripening may now assume greater significance. This work aimed to examine whether and how the COVID-19 pandemic has changed practice around IOL in the UK. METHOD: We used an online questionnaire to survey senior obstetricians and midwives at all 156 UK NHS Trusts and Boards that currently offer maternity services. Responses were analysed to produce descriptive statistics, with free text responses analysed using a conventional content analysis approach. FINDINGS: Responses were received from 92 of 156 UK Trusts and Boards, a 59% response rate. Many Trusts and Boards reported no change to their IOL practice, however 23% reported change in methods used for cervical ripening; 28% a change in criteria for home cervical ripening; 28% stated that more women were returning home during cervical ripening; and 24% noted changes to women’s response to recommendations for IOL. Much of the change was reported as happening in response to attempts to minimise hospital attendance and restrictions on birth partners accompanying women. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic has changed practice around induction of labour, although this varied significantly between NHS Trusts and Boards. There is a lack of formal evidence to support decision-making around outpatient cervical ripening: the basis on which changes were implemented and what evidence was used to inform decisions is not clear. BioMed Central 2021-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8054234/ /pubmed/33874913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03781-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Harkness, M. Yuill, C. Cheyne, H. Stock, S. J. McCourt, C. Induction of labour during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national survey of impact on practice in the UK |
title | Induction of labour during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national survey of impact on practice in the UK |
title_full | Induction of labour during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national survey of impact on practice in the UK |
title_fullStr | Induction of labour during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national survey of impact on practice in the UK |
title_full_unstemmed | Induction of labour during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national survey of impact on practice in the UK |
title_short | Induction of labour during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national survey of impact on practice in the UK |
title_sort | induction of labour during the covid-19 pandemic: a national survey of impact on practice in the uk |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8054234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33874913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03781-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harknessm inductionoflabourduringthecovid19pandemicanationalsurveyofimpactonpracticeintheuk AT yuillc inductionoflabourduringthecovid19pandemicanationalsurveyofimpactonpracticeintheuk AT cheyneh inductionoflabourduringthecovid19pandemicanationalsurveyofimpactonpracticeintheuk AT stocksj inductionoflabourduringthecovid19pandemicanationalsurveyofimpactonpracticeintheuk AT mccourtc inductionoflabourduringthecovid19pandemicanationalsurveyofimpactonpracticeintheuk AT inductionoflabourduringthecovid19pandemicanationalsurveyofimpactonpracticeintheuk |