Cargando…
Climate scientists set the bar of proof too high
Standards of proof for attributing real world events/damage to global warming should be the same as in clinical or environmental lawsuits, argue Lloyd et al. The central question that we raise is effective communication. How can climate scientists best and effectively communicate their findings to c...
Autores principales: | Lloyd, Elisabeth A., Oreskes, Naomi, Seneviratne, Sonia I., Larson, Edward J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8054254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33897072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03061-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming
por: Conway, Erik M, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Trends in American scientists’ political donations and implications for trust in science
por: Kaurov, Alexander A., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Setting the bar high
por: Schnell, Wolfgang
Publicado: (2004) -
Why trust science?
por: Oreskes, Naomi
Publicado: (2021) -
The trouble with the supply-side model of science
por: Oreskes, Naomi
Publicado: (2022)