Cargando…

Asociación de tipología familiar y disfuncionalidad en familias con adolescentes de una población mexicana

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between family typology and dysfunction in families with adolescents in a Mexican population. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. SETTING AND POPULATION: A total of 437 families in a Mexican population with adolescents attending a public high school....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ordóñez Azuara, Yeyetsy, Gutiérrez Herrera, Raúl F., Méndez Espinoza, Eduardo, Alvarez Villalobos, Neri A., Lopez Mata, Daniela, de la Cruz de la Cruz, Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8054295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32381266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2020.02.011
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between family typology and dysfunction in families with adolescents in a Mexican population. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. SETTING AND POPULATION: A total of 437 families in a Mexican population with adolescents attending a public high school. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Determination of family typology (Mexican Family Medicine Council and Consensus) and family function (family APGAR) in adolescents and their parents/guardians. Identification of families with concordant perceptions among members (Cohen kappa), in which the association between typology and perception of family dysfunction was determined (odds ratio [OR]). RESULTS: The types of families are associated with family function by kinship, physical presence in the home and the level of family poverty. From the perception of the adolescent, the types are associated with: simple nuclear (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.8), extended single parent (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.03-3.5), integrated nucleus (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9), low family poverty (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.8), and high family poverty (OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.5-18.6). From the perception of the tutor: the single parent (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.09-3.4), and high family poverty (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1-7.7). There were 259 families with concordant perception of family function/dysfunction with a κ = 0.189, determining that the types associated are: simple nuclear (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.7), single-parent (OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.80-3.8), integrated nucleus (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.8), non-integrated nucleus (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.09-3.5), and high family poverty (OR 13.8, 95% CI 1.7-108.5). CONCLUSION: The family types with adolescents associated with family dysfunction are single-parent families with a non-integrated nucleus and high family poverty, and as protective factors, the simple nuclear and integrated nucleus.