Cargando…
Rise in Use of Digital Mental Health Tools and Technologies in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Survey Study
BACKGROUND: Accompanying the rising rates of reported mental distress during the COVID-19 pandemic has been a reported increase in the use of digital technologies to manage health generally, and mental health more specifically. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to systematically examine whe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8054774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33822737 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26994 |
_version_ | 1783680347380121600 |
---|---|
author | Sorkin, Dara H Janio, Emily A Eikey, Elizabeth V Schneider, Margaret Davis, Katelyn Schueller, Stephen M Stadnick, Nicole A Zheng, Kai Neary, Martha Safani, David Mukamel, Dana B |
author_facet | Sorkin, Dara H Janio, Emily A Eikey, Elizabeth V Schneider, Margaret Davis, Katelyn Schueller, Stephen M Stadnick, Nicole A Zheng, Kai Neary, Martha Safani, David Mukamel, Dana B |
author_sort | Sorkin, Dara H |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Accompanying the rising rates of reported mental distress during the COVID-19 pandemic has been a reported increase in the use of digital technologies to manage health generally, and mental health more specifically. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to systematically examine whether there was a COVID-19 pandemic–related increase in the self-reported use of digital mental health tools and other technologies to manage mental health. METHODS: We analyzed results from a survey of 5907 individuals in the United States using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk); the survey was administered during 4 week-long periods in 2020 and survey respondents were from all 50 states and Washington DC. The first set of analyses employed two different logistic regression models to estimate the likelihood of having symptoms indicative of clinical depression and anxiety, respectively, as a function of the rate of COVID-19 cases per 10 people and survey time point. The second set employed seven different logistic regression models to estimate the likelihood of using seven different types of digital mental health tools and other technologies to manage one’s mental health, as a function of symptoms indicative of clinical depression and anxiety, rate of COVID-19 cases per 10 people, and survey time point. These models also examined potential interactions between symptoms of clinical depression and anxiety, respectively, and rate of COVID-19 cases. All models controlled for respondent sociodemographic characteristics and state fixed effects. RESULTS: Higher COVID-19 case rates were associated with a significantly greater likelihood of reporting symptoms of depression (odds ratio [OR] 2.06, 95% CI 1.27-3.35), but not anxiety (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.77-1.88). Survey time point, a proxy for time, was associated with a greater likelihood of reporting clinically meaningful symptoms of depression and anxiety (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.12-1.27 and OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05-1.19, respectively). Reported symptoms of depression and anxiety were associated with a greater likelihood of using each type of technology. Higher COVID-19 case rates were associated with a significantly greater likelihood of using mental health forums, websites, or apps (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.49-4.88), and other health forums, websites, or apps (OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.55-4.34). Time was associated with increased odds of reported use of mental health forums, websites, or apps (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.11-1.30), phone-based or text-based crisis lines (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.10-1.31), and online, computer, or console gaming/video gaming (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05-1.19). Interactions between COVID-19 case rate and mental health symptoms were not significantly associated with any of the technology types. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggested increased use of digital mental health tools and other technologies over time during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. As such, additional effort is urgently needed to consider the quality of these products, either by ensuring users have access to evidence-based and evidence-informed technologies and/or by providing them with the skills to make informed decisions around their potential efficacy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8054774 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80547742021-05-07 Rise in Use of Digital Mental Health Tools and Technologies in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Survey Study Sorkin, Dara H Janio, Emily A Eikey, Elizabeth V Schneider, Margaret Davis, Katelyn Schueller, Stephen M Stadnick, Nicole A Zheng, Kai Neary, Martha Safani, David Mukamel, Dana B J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Accompanying the rising rates of reported mental distress during the COVID-19 pandemic has been a reported increase in the use of digital technologies to manage health generally, and mental health more specifically. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to systematically examine whether there was a COVID-19 pandemic–related increase in the self-reported use of digital mental health tools and other technologies to manage mental health. METHODS: We analyzed results from a survey of 5907 individuals in the United States using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk); the survey was administered during 4 week-long periods in 2020 and survey respondents were from all 50 states and Washington DC. The first set of analyses employed two different logistic regression models to estimate the likelihood of having symptoms indicative of clinical depression and anxiety, respectively, as a function of the rate of COVID-19 cases per 10 people and survey time point. The second set employed seven different logistic regression models to estimate the likelihood of using seven different types of digital mental health tools and other technologies to manage one’s mental health, as a function of symptoms indicative of clinical depression and anxiety, rate of COVID-19 cases per 10 people, and survey time point. These models also examined potential interactions between symptoms of clinical depression and anxiety, respectively, and rate of COVID-19 cases. All models controlled for respondent sociodemographic characteristics and state fixed effects. RESULTS: Higher COVID-19 case rates were associated with a significantly greater likelihood of reporting symptoms of depression (odds ratio [OR] 2.06, 95% CI 1.27-3.35), but not anxiety (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.77-1.88). Survey time point, a proxy for time, was associated with a greater likelihood of reporting clinically meaningful symptoms of depression and anxiety (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.12-1.27 and OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05-1.19, respectively). Reported symptoms of depression and anxiety were associated with a greater likelihood of using each type of technology. Higher COVID-19 case rates were associated with a significantly greater likelihood of using mental health forums, websites, or apps (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.49-4.88), and other health forums, websites, or apps (OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.55-4.34). Time was associated with increased odds of reported use of mental health forums, websites, or apps (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.11-1.30), phone-based or text-based crisis lines (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.10-1.31), and online, computer, or console gaming/video gaming (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05-1.19). Interactions between COVID-19 case rate and mental health symptoms were not significantly associated with any of the technology types. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggested increased use of digital mental health tools and other technologies over time during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. As such, additional effort is urgently needed to consider the quality of these products, either by ensuring users have access to evidence-based and evidence-informed technologies and/or by providing them with the skills to make informed decisions around their potential efficacy. JMIR Publications 2021-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8054774/ /pubmed/33822737 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26994 Text en ©Dara H Sorkin, Emily A Janio, Elizabeth V Eikey, Margaret Schneider, Katelyn Davis, Stephen M Schueller, Nicole A Stadnick, Kai Zheng, Martha Neary, David Safani, Dana B Mukamel. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 16.04.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Sorkin, Dara H Janio, Emily A Eikey, Elizabeth V Schneider, Margaret Davis, Katelyn Schueller, Stephen M Stadnick, Nicole A Zheng, Kai Neary, Martha Safani, David Mukamel, Dana B Rise in Use of Digital Mental Health Tools and Technologies in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Survey Study |
title | Rise in Use of Digital Mental Health Tools and Technologies in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Survey Study |
title_full | Rise in Use of Digital Mental Health Tools and Technologies in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Survey Study |
title_fullStr | Rise in Use of Digital Mental Health Tools and Technologies in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Survey Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Rise in Use of Digital Mental Health Tools and Technologies in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Survey Study |
title_short | Rise in Use of Digital Mental Health Tools and Technologies in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Survey Study |
title_sort | rise in use of digital mental health tools and technologies in the united states during the covid-19 pandemic: survey study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8054774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33822737 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26994 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sorkindarah riseinuseofdigitalmentalhealthtoolsandtechnologiesintheunitedstatesduringthecovid19pandemicsurveystudy AT janioemilya riseinuseofdigitalmentalhealthtoolsandtechnologiesintheunitedstatesduringthecovid19pandemicsurveystudy AT eikeyelizabethv riseinuseofdigitalmentalhealthtoolsandtechnologiesintheunitedstatesduringthecovid19pandemicsurveystudy AT schneidermargaret riseinuseofdigitalmentalhealthtoolsandtechnologiesintheunitedstatesduringthecovid19pandemicsurveystudy AT daviskatelyn riseinuseofdigitalmentalhealthtoolsandtechnologiesintheunitedstatesduringthecovid19pandemicsurveystudy AT schuellerstephenm riseinuseofdigitalmentalhealthtoolsandtechnologiesintheunitedstatesduringthecovid19pandemicsurveystudy AT stadnicknicolea riseinuseofdigitalmentalhealthtoolsandtechnologiesintheunitedstatesduringthecovid19pandemicsurveystudy AT zhengkai riseinuseofdigitalmentalhealthtoolsandtechnologiesintheunitedstatesduringthecovid19pandemicsurveystudy AT nearymartha riseinuseofdigitalmentalhealthtoolsandtechnologiesintheunitedstatesduringthecovid19pandemicsurveystudy AT safanidavid riseinuseofdigitalmentalhealthtoolsandtechnologiesintheunitedstatesduringthecovid19pandemicsurveystudy AT mukameldanab riseinuseofdigitalmentalhealthtoolsandtechnologiesintheunitedstatesduringthecovid19pandemicsurveystudy |