Cargando…

Identifying Hand Use and Hand Roles After Stroke Using Egocentric Video

Objective: Upper limb (UL) impairment impacts quality of life, but is common after stroke. UL function evaluated in the clinic may not reflect use in activities of daily living (ADLs) after stroke, and current approaches for assessment at home rely on self-report and lack details about hand function...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IEEE 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2021.3072347
_version_ 1783680390156779520
collection PubMed
description Objective: Upper limb (UL) impairment impacts quality of life, but is common after stroke. UL function evaluated in the clinic may not reflect use in activities of daily living (ADLs) after stroke, and current approaches for assessment at home rely on self-report and lack details about hand function. Wrist-worn accelerometers have been applied to capture UL use, but also fail to reveal details of hand function. In response, a wearable system is proposed consisting of egocentric cameras combined with computer vision approaches, in order to identify hand use (hand-object interactions) and the role of the more-affected hand (as stabilizer or manipulator) in unconstrained environments. Methods: Nine stroke survivors recorded their performance of ADLs in a home simulation laboratory using an egocentric camera. Motion, hand shape, colour, and hand size change features were generated and fed into random forest classifiers to detect hand use and classify hand roles. Leave-one-subject-out cross-validation (LOSOCV) and leave-one-task-out cross-validation (LOTOCV) were used to evaluate the robustness of the algorithms. Results: LOSOCV and LOTOCV F1-scores for more-affected hand use were 0.64 ± 0.24 and 0.76 ± 0.23, respectively. For less-affected hands, LOSOCV and LOTOCV F1-scores were 0.72 ± 0.20 and 0.82 ± 0.22. F1-scores for hand role classification were 0.70 ± 0.19 and 0.68 ± 0.23 in the more-affected hand for LOSOCV and LOTOCV, respectively, and 0.59 ± 0.23 and 0.65 ± 0.28 in the less-affected hand. Conclusion: The results demonstrate the feasibility of predicting hand use and the hand roles of stroke survivors from egocentric videos.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8055062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher IEEE
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80550622021-04-21 Identifying Hand Use and Hand Roles After Stroke Using Egocentric Video IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Article Objective: Upper limb (UL) impairment impacts quality of life, but is common after stroke. UL function evaluated in the clinic may not reflect use in activities of daily living (ADLs) after stroke, and current approaches for assessment at home rely on self-report and lack details about hand function. Wrist-worn accelerometers have been applied to capture UL use, but also fail to reveal details of hand function. In response, a wearable system is proposed consisting of egocentric cameras combined with computer vision approaches, in order to identify hand use (hand-object interactions) and the role of the more-affected hand (as stabilizer or manipulator) in unconstrained environments. Methods: Nine stroke survivors recorded their performance of ADLs in a home simulation laboratory using an egocentric camera. Motion, hand shape, colour, and hand size change features were generated and fed into random forest classifiers to detect hand use and classify hand roles. Leave-one-subject-out cross-validation (LOSOCV) and leave-one-task-out cross-validation (LOTOCV) were used to evaluate the robustness of the algorithms. Results: LOSOCV and LOTOCV F1-scores for more-affected hand use were 0.64 ± 0.24 and 0.76 ± 0.23, respectively. For less-affected hands, LOSOCV and LOTOCV F1-scores were 0.72 ± 0.20 and 0.82 ± 0.22. F1-scores for hand role classification were 0.70 ± 0.19 and 0.68 ± 0.23 in the more-affected hand for LOSOCV and LOTOCV, respectively, and 0.59 ± 0.23 and 0.65 ± 0.28 in the less-affected hand. Conclusion: The results demonstrate the feasibility of predicting hand use and the hand roles of stroke survivors from egocentric videos. IEEE 2021-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8055062/ /pubmed/33889453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2021.3072347 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Identifying Hand Use and Hand Roles After Stroke Using Egocentric Video
title Identifying Hand Use and Hand Roles After Stroke Using Egocentric Video
title_full Identifying Hand Use and Hand Roles After Stroke Using Egocentric Video
title_fullStr Identifying Hand Use and Hand Roles After Stroke Using Egocentric Video
title_full_unstemmed Identifying Hand Use and Hand Roles After Stroke Using Egocentric Video
title_short Identifying Hand Use and Hand Roles After Stroke Using Egocentric Video
title_sort identifying hand use and hand roles after stroke using egocentric video
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2021.3072347
work_keys_str_mv AT identifyinghanduseandhandrolesafterstrokeusingegocentricvideo
AT identifyinghanduseandhandrolesafterstrokeusingegocentricvideo
AT identifyinghanduseandhandrolesafterstrokeusingegocentricvideo