Cargando…

Protocol for a mixed-method study to inform the feasibility of undertaking a large-scale multicentre study comparing the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of oncoplastic breast conservation as an alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction in women unsuitable for standard breast-conserving surgery (the ANTHEM Feasibility Study)

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 40% of the 55 000 women diagnosed with breast cancer each year in the UK undergo mastectomy because they are considered unsuitable for standard breast-conserving surgery (BCS) due to tumour size or multiple tumour foci. Mastectomy can significantly impact women’s quality...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davies, Charlotte, Holcombe, Christopher, Skillman, Joanna, Whisker, Lisa, Hollingworth, William, Conefrey, Carmel, Mills, Nicola, White, Paul, Comins, Charles, Macmillan, Douglas, Fairbrother, Patricia, Potter, Shelley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33863715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046622
_version_ 1783680393224912896
author Davies, Charlotte
Holcombe, Christopher
Skillman, Joanna
Whisker, Lisa
Hollingworth, William
Conefrey, Carmel
Mills, Nicola
White, Paul
Comins, Charles
Macmillan, Douglas
Fairbrother, Patricia
Potter, Shelley
author_facet Davies, Charlotte
Holcombe, Christopher
Skillman, Joanna
Whisker, Lisa
Hollingworth, William
Conefrey, Carmel
Mills, Nicola
White, Paul
Comins, Charles
Macmillan, Douglas
Fairbrother, Patricia
Potter, Shelley
author_sort Davies, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Approximately 40% of the 55 000 women diagnosed with breast cancer each year in the UK undergo mastectomy because they are considered unsuitable for standard breast-conserving surgery (BCS) due to tumour size or multiple tumour foci. Mastectomy can significantly impact women’s quality of life, and only one in four women currently undergo immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Level 2 oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OPBCS) combines removing the cancer with a range of plastic surgical volume replacement (eg, local perforator flaps) and volume displacement techniques (eg, therapeutic mammaplasty) that can extend the role of BCS and may allow some women not suitable for standard BCS to avoid mastectomy. High-quality research to determine whether OPBCS offers a safe and effective alternative to mastectomy±IBR is currently lacking. Preliminary work is needed to ensure a future large-scale study is feasible and well designed and addresses questions important to patients and the National Health Service. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Mixed methods will be used to inform feasibility and design of a future large-scale study comparing the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of OPBCS and mastectomy±IBR. It will have four parts: (1) a National Practice Questionnaire to determine current practice and provision of oncoplastic breast and reconstructive surgery in the UK; (2) a pilot multicentre prospective cohort study to explore the proportion of patients choosing OPBCS versus mastectomy, the proportion in OPBCS is successful and clinical and patient-reported outcomes of different techniques at 3 and 12 months postsurgery; (3) a qualitative interview study to explore patients’ attitudes to different procedures, rationale for decision-making and perceptions of outcomes; and (4) design of the future study. All centres offering OPBCS and mastectomy in the UK will be invited to participate. Recruitment is planned to commence winter 2020 and continue for 12 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has ethical approval from the Wales Research Ethics Committee 6 National Research Ethics Service (REC Ref 20/WA/0225). Results will be presented at national and international meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. We will work with patients to develop lay summaries and share these through patient groups and breast cancer charities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN18238549.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8055121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80551212021-04-28 Protocol for a mixed-method study to inform the feasibility of undertaking a large-scale multicentre study comparing the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of oncoplastic breast conservation as an alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction in women unsuitable for standard breast-conserving surgery (the ANTHEM Feasibility Study) Davies, Charlotte Holcombe, Christopher Skillman, Joanna Whisker, Lisa Hollingworth, William Conefrey, Carmel Mills, Nicola White, Paul Comins, Charles Macmillan, Douglas Fairbrother, Patricia Potter, Shelley BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Approximately 40% of the 55 000 women diagnosed with breast cancer each year in the UK undergo mastectomy because they are considered unsuitable for standard breast-conserving surgery (BCS) due to tumour size or multiple tumour foci. Mastectomy can significantly impact women’s quality of life, and only one in four women currently undergo immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Level 2 oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OPBCS) combines removing the cancer with a range of plastic surgical volume replacement (eg, local perforator flaps) and volume displacement techniques (eg, therapeutic mammaplasty) that can extend the role of BCS and may allow some women not suitable for standard BCS to avoid mastectomy. High-quality research to determine whether OPBCS offers a safe and effective alternative to mastectomy±IBR is currently lacking. Preliminary work is needed to ensure a future large-scale study is feasible and well designed and addresses questions important to patients and the National Health Service. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Mixed methods will be used to inform feasibility and design of a future large-scale study comparing the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of OPBCS and mastectomy±IBR. It will have four parts: (1) a National Practice Questionnaire to determine current practice and provision of oncoplastic breast and reconstructive surgery in the UK; (2) a pilot multicentre prospective cohort study to explore the proportion of patients choosing OPBCS versus mastectomy, the proportion in OPBCS is successful and clinical and patient-reported outcomes of different techniques at 3 and 12 months postsurgery; (3) a qualitative interview study to explore patients’ attitudes to different procedures, rationale for decision-making and perceptions of outcomes; and (4) design of the future study. All centres offering OPBCS and mastectomy in the UK will be invited to participate. Recruitment is planned to commence winter 2020 and continue for 12 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has ethical approval from the Wales Research Ethics Committee 6 National Research Ethics Service (REC Ref 20/WA/0225). Results will be presented at national and international meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. We will work with patients to develop lay summaries and share these through patient groups and breast cancer charities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN18238549. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8055121/ /pubmed/33863715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046622 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Surgery
Davies, Charlotte
Holcombe, Christopher
Skillman, Joanna
Whisker, Lisa
Hollingworth, William
Conefrey, Carmel
Mills, Nicola
White, Paul
Comins, Charles
Macmillan, Douglas
Fairbrother, Patricia
Potter, Shelley
Protocol for a mixed-method study to inform the feasibility of undertaking a large-scale multicentre study comparing the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of oncoplastic breast conservation as an alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction in women unsuitable for standard breast-conserving surgery (the ANTHEM Feasibility Study)
title Protocol for a mixed-method study to inform the feasibility of undertaking a large-scale multicentre study comparing the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of oncoplastic breast conservation as an alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction in women unsuitable for standard breast-conserving surgery (the ANTHEM Feasibility Study)
title_full Protocol for a mixed-method study to inform the feasibility of undertaking a large-scale multicentre study comparing the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of oncoplastic breast conservation as an alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction in women unsuitable for standard breast-conserving surgery (the ANTHEM Feasibility Study)
title_fullStr Protocol for a mixed-method study to inform the feasibility of undertaking a large-scale multicentre study comparing the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of oncoplastic breast conservation as an alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction in women unsuitable for standard breast-conserving surgery (the ANTHEM Feasibility Study)
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for a mixed-method study to inform the feasibility of undertaking a large-scale multicentre study comparing the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of oncoplastic breast conservation as an alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction in women unsuitable for standard breast-conserving surgery (the ANTHEM Feasibility Study)
title_short Protocol for a mixed-method study to inform the feasibility of undertaking a large-scale multicentre study comparing the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of oncoplastic breast conservation as an alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction in women unsuitable for standard breast-conserving surgery (the ANTHEM Feasibility Study)
title_sort protocol for a mixed-method study to inform the feasibility of undertaking a large-scale multicentre study comparing the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of oncoplastic breast conservation as an alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction in women unsuitable for standard breast-conserving surgery (the anthem feasibility study)
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33863715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046622
work_keys_str_mv AT daviescharlotte protocolforamixedmethodstudytoinformthefeasibilityofundertakingalargescalemulticentrestudycomparingtheclinicalandpatientreportedoutcomesofoncoplasticbreastconservationasanalternativetomastectomywithorwithoutimmediatebreastreconstructioninwomenunsuitablefo
AT holcombechristopher protocolforamixedmethodstudytoinformthefeasibilityofundertakingalargescalemulticentrestudycomparingtheclinicalandpatientreportedoutcomesofoncoplasticbreastconservationasanalternativetomastectomywithorwithoutimmediatebreastreconstructioninwomenunsuitablefo
AT skillmanjoanna protocolforamixedmethodstudytoinformthefeasibilityofundertakingalargescalemulticentrestudycomparingtheclinicalandpatientreportedoutcomesofoncoplasticbreastconservationasanalternativetomastectomywithorwithoutimmediatebreastreconstructioninwomenunsuitablefo
AT whiskerlisa protocolforamixedmethodstudytoinformthefeasibilityofundertakingalargescalemulticentrestudycomparingtheclinicalandpatientreportedoutcomesofoncoplasticbreastconservationasanalternativetomastectomywithorwithoutimmediatebreastreconstructioninwomenunsuitablefo
AT hollingworthwilliam protocolforamixedmethodstudytoinformthefeasibilityofundertakingalargescalemulticentrestudycomparingtheclinicalandpatientreportedoutcomesofoncoplasticbreastconservationasanalternativetomastectomywithorwithoutimmediatebreastreconstructioninwomenunsuitablefo
AT conefreycarmel protocolforamixedmethodstudytoinformthefeasibilityofundertakingalargescalemulticentrestudycomparingtheclinicalandpatientreportedoutcomesofoncoplasticbreastconservationasanalternativetomastectomywithorwithoutimmediatebreastreconstructioninwomenunsuitablefo
AT millsnicola protocolforamixedmethodstudytoinformthefeasibilityofundertakingalargescalemulticentrestudycomparingtheclinicalandpatientreportedoutcomesofoncoplasticbreastconservationasanalternativetomastectomywithorwithoutimmediatebreastreconstructioninwomenunsuitablefo
AT whitepaul protocolforamixedmethodstudytoinformthefeasibilityofundertakingalargescalemulticentrestudycomparingtheclinicalandpatientreportedoutcomesofoncoplasticbreastconservationasanalternativetomastectomywithorwithoutimmediatebreastreconstructioninwomenunsuitablefo
AT cominscharles protocolforamixedmethodstudytoinformthefeasibilityofundertakingalargescalemulticentrestudycomparingtheclinicalandpatientreportedoutcomesofoncoplasticbreastconservationasanalternativetomastectomywithorwithoutimmediatebreastreconstructioninwomenunsuitablefo
AT macmillandouglas protocolforamixedmethodstudytoinformthefeasibilityofundertakingalargescalemulticentrestudycomparingtheclinicalandpatientreportedoutcomesofoncoplasticbreastconservationasanalternativetomastectomywithorwithoutimmediatebreastreconstructioninwomenunsuitablefo
AT fairbrotherpatricia protocolforamixedmethodstudytoinformthefeasibilityofundertakingalargescalemulticentrestudycomparingtheclinicalandpatientreportedoutcomesofoncoplasticbreastconservationasanalternativetomastectomywithorwithoutimmediatebreastreconstructioninwomenunsuitablefo
AT pottershelley protocolforamixedmethodstudytoinformthefeasibilityofundertakingalargescalemulticentrestudycomparingtheclinicalandpatientreportedoutcomesofoncoplasticbreastconservationasanalternativetomastectomywithorwithoutimmediatebreastreconstructioninwomenunsuitablefo