Cargando…

The effectiveness of maternity waiting homes in reducing perinatal mortality: a case–control study in Ethiopia

BACKGROUND: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development aims to reduce neonatal mortality to at least 12 per 1000 live births. Most of the causes can be prevented or cured. Access to quality healthcare during pregnancy and labour is the key to reduce perinatal deaths, and maternity waiting homes (MW...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dalla Zuanna, Teresa, Fonzo, Marco, Sperotto, Milena, Resti, Carlo, Tsegaye, Ademe, Azzimonti, Gaetano, Manenti, Fabio, Putoto, Giovanni, Bertoncello, Chiara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33863756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004140
_version_ 1783680394868031488
author Dalla Zuanna, Teresa
Fonzo, Marco
Sperotto, Milena
Resti, Carlo
Tsegaye, Ademe
Azzimonti, Gaetano
Manenti, Fabio
Putoto, Giovanni
Bertoncello, Chiara
author_facet Dalla Zuanna, Teresa
Fonzo, Marco
Sperotto, Milena
Resti, Carlo
Tsegaye, Ademe
Azzimonti, Gaetano
Manenti, Fabio
Putoto, Giovanni
Bertoncello, Chiara
author_sort Dalla Zuanna, Teresa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development aims to reduce neonatal mortality to at least 12 per 1000 live births. Most of the causes can be prevented or cured. Access to quality healthcare during pregnancy and labour is the key to reduce perinatal deaths, and maternity waiting homes (MWHs) may have an impact, especially for women who live far from the healthcare system. We conducted a case–control study to evaluate the effectiveness of MWH in reducing perinatal mortality in a secondary hospital in Ethiopia. METHODS: We did a nested case–control study from January 2014 through December 2017. The enrolled cases were mothers whose childbirth resulted in stillbirth or early neonatal death. The controls were mothers with an alive baby at 7 days or with an alive baby on discharge. We collected demographic, anamnestic, pregnancy-related and obstetric-related data. The effectiveness of the MWH on perinatal death was assessed by a logistic regression model, adjusted for all other variables investigated as potential confounders. We also did a sensitivity analysis to explore the role of twin pregnancies. RESULTS: We included 1175 cases and 2350 controls. The crude analysis showed a protective effect of the MWH towards perinatal mortality (OR=0.700; 95% CI: 0.505 to 0.972), even more protective after adjustment for confounders (adjusted OR (AOR)=0.452; 95% CI: 0.293 to 0.698). Sensitivity analyses showed a consistent result, even excluding twin pregnancies (AOR=0.550; 95% CI: 0.330 to 0.917). CONCLUSION: MWHs appear to reduce perinatal mortality by 55%. Our findings support the decision to invest in MWH to support pregnant women with higher quality and more comprehensive healthcare strategy, including quality antenatal care in peripheral primary care clinics, where risk factors can be recognised and women can be addressed for admission to MWH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8055136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80551362021-04-28 The effectiveness of maternity waiting homes in reducing perinatal mortality: a case–control study in Ethiopia Dalla Zuanna, Teresa Fonzo, Marco Sperotto, Milena Resti, Carlo Tsegaye, Ademe Azzimonti, Gaetano Manenti, Fabio Putoto, Giovanni Bertoncello, Chiara BMJ Glob Health Original Research BACKGROUND: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development aims to reduce neonatal mortality to at least 12 per 1000 live births. Most of the causes can be prevented or cured. Access to quality healthcare during pregnancy and labour is the key to reduce perinatal deaths, and maternity waiting homes (MWHs) may have an impact, especially for women who live far from the healthcare system. We conducted a case–control study to evaluate the effectiveness of MWH in reducing perinatal mortality in a secondary hospital in Ethiopia. METHODS: We did a nested case–control study from January 2014 through December 2017. The enrolled cases were mothers whose childbirth resulted in stillbirth or early neonatal death. The controls were mothers with an alive baby at 7 days or with an alive baby on discharge. We collected demographic, anamnestic, pregnancy-related and obstetric-related data. The effectiveness of the MWH on perinatal death was assessed by a logistic regression model, adjusted for all other variables investigated as potential confounders. We also did a sensitivity analysis to explore the role of twin pregnancies. RESULTS: We included 1175 cases and 2350 controls. The crude analysis showed a protective effect of the MWH towards perinatal mortality (OR=0.700; 95% CI: 0.505 to 0.972), even more protective after adjustment for confounders (adjusted OR (AOR)=0.452; 95% CI: 0.293 to 0.698). Sensitivity analyses showed a consistent result, even excluding twin pregnancies (AOR=0.550; 95% CI: 0.330 to 0.917). CONCLUSION: MWHs appear to reduce perinatal mortality by 55%. Our findings support the decision to invest in MWH to support pregnant women with higher quality and more comprehensive healthcare strategy, including quality antenatal care in peripheral primary care clinics, where risk factors can be recognised and women can be addressed for admission to MWH. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8055136/ /pubmed/33863756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004140 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Dalla Zuanna, Teresa
Fonzo, Marco
Sperotto, Milena
Resti, Carlo
Tsegaye, Ademe
Azzimonti, Gaetano
Manenti, Fabio
Putoto, Giovanni
Bertoncello, Chiara
The effectiveness of maternity waiting homes in reducing perinatal mortality: a case–control study in Ethiopia
title The effectiveness of maternity waiting homes in reducing perinatal mortality: a case–control study in Ethiopia
title_full The effectiveness of maternity waiting homes in reducing perinatal mortality: a case–control study in Ethiopia
title_fullStr The effectiveness of maternity waiting homes in reducing perinatal mortality: a case–control study in Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of maternity waiting homes in reducing perinatal mortality: a case–control study in Ethiopia
title_short The effectiveness of maternity waiting homes in reducing perinatal mortality: a case–control study in Ethiopia
title_sort effectiveness of maternity waiting homes in reducing perinatal mortality: a case–control study in ethiopia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33863756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004140
work_keys_str_mv AT dallazuannateresa theeffectivenessofmaternitywaitinghomesinreducingperinatalmortalityacasecontrolstudyinethiopia
AT fonzomarco theeffectivenessofmaternitywaitinghomesinreducingperinatalmortalityacasecontrolstudyinethiopia
AT sperottomilena theeffectivenessofmaternitywaitinghomesinreducingperinatalmortalityacasecontrolstudyinethiopia
AT resticarlo theeffectivenessofmaternitywaitinghomesinreducingperinatalmortalityacasecontrolstudyinethiopia
AT tsegayeademe theeffectivenessofmaternitywaitinghomesinreducingperinatalmortalityacasecontrolstudyinethiopia
AT azzimontigaetano theeffectivenessofmaternitywaitinghomesinreducingperinatalmortalityacasecontrolstudyinethiopia
AT manentifabio theeffectivenessofmaternitywaitinghomesinreducingperinatalmortalityacasecontrolstudyinethiopia
AT putotogiovanni theeffectivenessofmaternitywaitinghomesinreducingperinatalmortalityacasecontrolstudyinethiopia
AT bertoncellochiara theeffectivenessofmaternitywaitinghomesinreducingperinatalmortalityacasecontrolstudyinethiopia
AT dallazuannateresa effectivenessofmaternitywaitinghomesinreducingperinatalmortalityacasecontrolstudyinethiopia
AT fonzomarco effectivenessofmaternitywaitinghomesinreducingperinatalmortalityacasecontrolstudyinethiopia
AT sperottomilena effectivenessofmaternitywaitinghomesinreducingperinatalmortalityacasecontrolstudyinethiopia
AT resticarlo effectivenessofmaternitywaitinghomesinreducingperinatalmortalityacasecontrolstudyinethiopia
AT tsegayeademe effectivenessofmaternitywaitinghomesinreducingperinatalmortalityacasecontrolstudyinethiopia
AT azzimontigaetano effectivenessofmaternitywaitinghomesinreducingperinatalmortalityacasecontrolstudyinethiopia
AT manentifabio effectivenessofmaternitywaitinghomesinreducingperinatalmortalityacasecontrolstudyinethiopia
AT putotogiovanni effectivenessofmaternitywaitinghomesinreducingperinatalmortalityacasecontrolstudyinethiopia
AT bertoncellochiara effectivenessofmaternitywaitinghomesinreducingperinatalmortalityacasecontrolstudyinethiopia