Cargando…
Delivering screening programmes in primary care: protocol for a scoping and systematic mixed studies review
INTRODUCTION: Screening programmes represent a considerable amount of healthcare activity. As complex interventions, they require careful delivery to generate net benefit. Much screening work occurs in primary care. Despite intensive study of intervention delivery in primary care, there is currently...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33858873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046331 |
_version_ | 1783680396762808320 |
---|---|
author | Modi, Rakesh Narendra Kelly, Sarah Hoare, Sarah Powell, Alison Kuhn, Isla Usher-Smith, Juliet Mant, Jonathan Burt, Jenni |
author_facet | Modi, Rakesh Narendra Kelly, Sarah Hoare, Sarah Powell, Alison Kuhn, Isla Usher-Smith, Juliet Mant, Jonathan Burt, Jenni |
author_sort | Modi, Rakesh Narendra |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Screening programmes represent a considerable amount of healthcare activity. As complex interventions, they require careful delivery to generate net benefit. Much screening work occurs in primary care. Despite intensive study of intervention delivery in primary care, there is currently no synthesis of the delivery of screening programmes in this setting. The purpose of this review is to describe and critically evaluate the delivery of screening programmes in general practice and community services. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use scoping review methods to explore which components of screening programmes are delivered in primary care and systematic review methods to locate and synthesise evidence on how screening programmes can be delivered in primary care, including barriers, facilitators and strategies. We will include empirical studies of any design which consider screening programmes in high-income countries, based in part or whole in primary care. We will search 20 information sources from 1 January 2000, including those relating to health (eg, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL), management (eg, Rx for change database) and grey literature (eg, OpenGrey, screening committee websites). Two reviewers will screen citations and full texts of potentially eligible studies and assess these against inclusion criteria. Qualitative and quantitative data will be extracted in duplicate and synthesised using a best fit framework approach. Within the systematic review, the mixed methods appraisal tool will be used to assess risk of bias. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics approval is required. We will disseminate findings to academics through publication and presentation, to decision-makers through national screening bodies, to practitioners through professional bodies, and to the public through social media. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020215420. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8055151 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80551512021-04-28 Delivering screening programmes in primary care: protocol for a scoping and systematic mixed studies review Modi, Rakesh Narendra Kelly, Sarah Hoare, Sarah Powell, Alison Kuhn, Isla Usher-Smith, Juliet Mant, Jonathan Burt, Jenni BMJ Open General practice / Family practice INTRODUCTION: Screening programmes represent a considerable amount of healthcare activity. As complex interventions, they require careful delivery to generate net benefit. Much screening work occurs in primary care. Despite intensive study of intervention delivery in primary care, there is currently no synthesis of the delivery of screening programmes in this setting. The purpose of this review is to describe and critically evaluate the delivery of screening programmes in general practice and community services. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use scoping review methods to explore which components of screening programmes are delivered in primary care and systematic review methods to locate and synthesise evidence on how screening programmes can be delivered in primary care, including barriers, facilitators and strategies. We will include empirical studies of any design which consider screening programmes in high-income countries, based in part or whole in primary care. We will search 20 information sources from 1 January 2000, including those relating to health (eg, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL), management (eg, Rx for change database) and grey literature (eg, OpenGrey, screening committee websites). Two reviewers will screen citations and full texts of potentially eligible studies and assess these against inclusion criteria. Qualitative and quantitative data will be extracted in duplicate and synthesised using a best fit framework approach. Within the systematic review, the mixed methods appraisal tool will be used to assess risk of bias. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics approval is required. We will disseminate findings to academics through publication and presentation, to decision-makers through national screening bodies, to practitioners through professional bodies, and to the public through social media. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020215420. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8055151/ /pubmed/33858873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046331 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Modi, Rakesh Narendra Kelly, Sarah Hoare, Sarah Powell, Alison Kuhn, Isla Usher-Smith, Juliet Mant, Jonathan Burt, Jenni Delivering screening programmes in primary care: protocol for a scoping and systematic mixed studies review |
title | Delivering screening programmes in primary care: protocol for a scoping and systematic mixed studies review |
title_full | Delivering screening programmes in primary care: protocol for a scoping and systematic mixed studies review |
title_fullStr | Delivering screening programmes in primary care: protocol for a scoping and systematic mixed studies review |
title_full_unstemmed | Delivering screening programmes in primary care: protocol for a scoping and systematic mixed studies review |
title_short | Delivering screening programmes in primary care: protocol for a scoping and systematic mixed studies review |
title_sort | delivering screening programmes in primary care: protocol for a scoping and systematic mixed studies review |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33858873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046331 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT modirakeshnarendra deliveringscreeningprogrammesinprimarycareprotocolforascopingandsystematicmixedstudiesreview AT kellysarah deliveringscreeningprogrammesinprimarycareprotocolforascopingandsystematicmixedstudiesreview AT hoaresarah deliveringscreeningprogrammesinprimarycareprotocolforascopingandsystematicmixedstudiesreview AT powellalison deliveringscreeningprogrammesinprimarycareprotocolforascopingandsystematicmixedstudiesreview AT kuhnisla deliveringscreeningprogrammesinprimarycareprotocolforascopingandsystematicmixedstudiesreview AT ushersmithjuliet deliveringscreeningprogrammesinprimarycareprotocolforascopingandsystematicmixedstudiesreview AT mantjonathan deliveringscreeningprogrammesinprimarycareprotocolforascopingandsystematicmixedstudiesreview AT burtjenni deliveringscreeningprogrammesinprimarycareprotocolforascopingandsystematicmixedstudiesreview |