Cargando…
Safety and immunogenicity of an MF59-adjuvanted spike glycoprotein-clamp vaccine for SARS-CoV-2: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial
BACKGROUND: Given the scale of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the development of vaccines based on different platforms is essential, particularly in light of emerging viral variants, the absence of information on vaccine-induced immune durability, and potential paediatric use. We aimed to assess the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33887208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00200-0 |
_version_ | 1783680408430313472 |
---|---|
author | Chappell, Keith J Mordant, Francesca L Li, Zheyi Wijesundara, Danushka K Ellenberg, Paula Lackenby, Julia A Cheung, Stacey T M Modhiran, Naphak Avumegah, Michael S Henderson, Christina L Hoger, Kym Griffin, Paul Bennet, Jillian Hensen, Luca Zhang, Wuji Nguyen, Thi H O Marrero-Hernandez, Sara Selva, Kevin J Chung, Amy W Tran, Mai H Tapley, Peter Barnes, James Reading, Patrick C Nicholson, Suellen Corby, Stavroula Holgate, Thomas Wines, Bruce D Hogarth, P Mark Kedzierska, Katherine Purcell, Damian F J Ranasinghe, Charani Subbarao, Kanta Watterson, Daniel Young, Paul R Munro, Trent P |
author_facet | Chappell, Keith J Mordant, Francesca L Li, Zheyi Wijesundara, Danushka K Ellenberg, Paula Lackenby, Julia A Cheung, Stacey T M Modhiran, Naphak Avumegah, Michael S Henderson, Christina L Hoger, Kym Griffin, Paul Bennet, Jillian Hensen, Luca Zhang, Wuji Nguyen, Thi H O Marrero-Hernandez, Sara Selva, Kevin J Chung, Amy W Tran, Mai H Tapley, Peter Barnes, James Reading, Patrick C Nicholson, Suellen Corby, Stavroula Holgate, Thomas Wines, Bruce D Hogarth, P Mark Kedzierska, Katherine Purcell, Damian F J Ranasinghe, Charani Subbarao, Kanta Watterson, Daniel Young, Paul R Munro, Trent P |
author_sort | Chappell, Keith J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Given the scale of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the development of vaccines based on different platforms is essential, particularly in light of emerging viral variants, the absence of information on vaccine-induced immune durability, and potential paediatric use. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of an MF59-adjuvanted subunit vaccine for COVID-19 based on recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein stabilised in a pre-fusion conformation by a novel molecular clamp (spike glycoprotein-clamp [sclamp]). METHODS: We did a phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled, block-randomised trial of the sclamp subunit vaccine in a single clinical trial site in Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Healthy adults (aged ≥18 to ≤55 years) who had tested negative for SARS-CoV-2, reported no close contact with anyone with active or previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and tested negative for pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 immunity were included. Participants were randomly assigned to one of five treatment groups and received two doses via intramuscular injection 28 days apart of either placebo, sclamp vaccine at 5 μg, 15 μg, or 45 μg, or one dose of sclamp vaccine at 45 μg followed by placebo. Participants and study personnel, except the dose administration personnel, were masked to treatment. The primary safety endpoints included solicited local and systemic adverse events in the 7 days after each dose and unsolicited adverse events up to 12 months after dosing. Here, data are reported up until day 57. Primary immunogenicity endpoints were antigen-specific IgG ELISA and SARS-CoV-2 microneutralisation assays assessed at 28 days after each dose. The study is ongoing and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04495933. FINDINGS: Between June 23, 2020, and Aug 17, 2020, of 314 healthy volunteers screened, 120 were randomly assigned (n=24 per group), and 114 (95%) completed the study up to day 57 (mean age 32·5 years [SD 10·4], 65 [54%] male, 55 [46%] female). Severe solicited reactions were infrequent and occurred at similar rates in participants receiving placebo (two [8%] of 24) and the SARS-CoV-2 sclamp vaccine at any dose (three [3%] of 96). Both solicited reactions and unsolicited adverse events occurred at a similar frequency in participants receiving placebo and the SARS-CoV-2 sclamp vaccine. Solicited reactions occurred in 19 (79%) of 24 participants receiving placebo and 86 (90%) of 96 receiving the SARS-CoV-2 sclamp vaccine at any dose. Unsolicited adverse events occurred in seven (29%) of 24 participants receiving placebo and 35 (36%) of 96 participants receiving the SARS-CoV-2 sclamp vaccine at any dose. Vaccination with SARS-CoV-2 sclamp elicited a similar antigen-specific response irrespective of dose: 4 weeks after the initial dose (day 29) with 5 μg dose (geometric mean titre [GMT] 6400, 95% CI 3683–11 122), with 15 μg dose (7492, 4959–11 319), and the two 45 μg dose cohorts (8770, 5526–13 920 in the two-dose 45 μg cohort; 8793, 5570–13 881 in the single-dose 45 μg cohort); 4 weeks after the second dose (day 57) with two 5 μg doses (102 400, 64 857–161 676), with two 15 μg doses (74 725, 51 300–108 847), with two 45 μg doses (79 586, 55 430–114 268), only a single 45 μg dose (4795, 2858–8043). At day 57, 67 (99%) of 68 participants who received two doses of sclamp vaccine at any concentration produced a neutralising immune response, compared with six (25%) of 24 who received a single 45 μg dose and none of 22 who received placebo. Participants receiving two doses of sclamp vaccine elicited similar neutralisation titres, irrespective of dose: two 5 μg doses (GMT 228, 95% CI 146–356), two 15 μg doses (230, 170–312), and two 45 μg doses (239, 187–307). INTERPRETATION: This first-in-human trial shows that a subunit vaccine comprising mammalian cell culture-derived, MF59-adjuvanted, molecular clamp-stabilised recombinant spike protein elicits strong immune responses with a promising safety profile. However, the glycoprotein 41 peptide present in the clamp created HIV diagnostic assay interference, a possible barrier to widespread use highlighting the criticality of potential non-spike directed immunogenicity during vaccine development. Studies are ongoing with alternative molecular clamp trimerisation domains to ameliorate this response. FUNDING: Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, National Health and Medical Research Council, Queensland Government, and further philanthropic sources listed in the acknowledgments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8055208 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80552082021-04-20 Safety and immunogenicity of an MF59-adjuvanted spike glycoprotein-clamp vaccine for SARS-CoV-2: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial Chappell, Keith J Mordant, Francesca L Li, Zheyi Wijesundara, Danushka K Ellenberg, Paula Lackenby, Julia A Cheung, Stacey T M Modhiran, Naphak Avumegah, Michael S Henderson, Christina L Hoger, Kym Griffin, Paul Bennet, Jillian Hensen, Luca Zhang, Wuji Nguyen, Thi H O Marrero-Hernandez, Sara Selva, Kevin J Chung, Amy W Tran, Mai H Tapley, Peter Barnes, James Reading, Patrick C Nicholson, Suellen Corby, Stavroula Holgate, Thomas Wines, Bruce D Hogarth, P Mark Kedzierska, Katherine Purcell, Damian F J Ranasinghe, Charani Subbarao, Kanta Watterson, Daniel Young, Paul R Munro, Trent P Lancet Infect Dis Articles BACKGROUND: Given the scale of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the development of vaccines based on different platforms is essential, particularly in light of emerging viral variants, the absence of information on vaccine-induced immune durability, and potential paediatric use. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of an MF59-adjuvanted subunit vaccine for COVID-19 based on recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein stabilised in a pre-fusion conformation by a novel molecular clamp (spike glycoprotein-clamp [sclamp]). METHODS: We did a phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled, block-randomised trial of the sclamp subunit vaccine in a single clinical trial site in Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Healthy adults (aged ≥18 to ≤55 years) who had tested negative for SARS-CoV-2, reported no close contact with anyone with active or previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and tested negative for pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 immunity were included. Participants were randomly assigned to one of five treatment groups and received two doses via intramuscular injection 28 days apart of either placebo, sclamp vaccine at 5 μg, 15 μg, or 45 μg, or one dose of sclamp vaccine at 45 μg followed by placebo. Participants and study personnel, except the dose administration personnel, were masked to treatment. The primary safety endpoints included solicited local and systemic adverse events in the 7 days after each dose and unsolicited adverse events up to 12 months after dosing. Here, data are reported up until day 57. Primary immunogenicity endpoints were antigen-specific IgG ELISA and SARS-CoV-2 microneutralisation assays assessed at 28 days after each dose. The study is ongoing and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04495933. FINDINGS: Between June 23, 2020, and Aug 17, 2020, of 314 healthy volunteers screened, 120 were randomly assigned (n=24 per group), and 114 (95%) completed the study up to day 57 (mean age 32·5 years [SD 10·4], 65 [54%] male, 55 [46%] female). Severe solicited reactions were infrequent and occurred at similar rates in participants receiving placebo (two [8%] of 24) and the SARS-CoV-2 sclamp vaccine at any dose (three [3%] of 96). Both solicited reactions and unsolicited adverse events occurred at a similar frequency in participants receiving placebo and the SARS-CoV-2 sclamp vaccine. Solicited reactions occurred in 19 (79%) of 24 participants receiving placebo and 86 (90%) of 96 receiving the SARS-CoV-2 sclamp vaccine at any dose. Unsolicited adverse events occurred in seven (29%) of 24 participants receiving placebo and 35 (36%) of 96 participants receiving the SARS-CoV-2 sclamp vaccine at any dose. Vaccination with SARS-CoV-2 sclamp elicited a similar antigen-specific response irrespective of dose: 4 weeks after the initial dose (day 29) with 5 μg dose (geometric mean titre [GMT] 6400, 95% CI 3683–11 122), with 15 μg dose (7492, 4959–11 319), and the two 45 μg dose cohorts (8770, 5526–13 920 in the two-dose 45 μg cohort; 8793, 5570–13 881 in the single-dose 45 μg cohort); 4 weeks after the second dose (day 57) with two 5 μg doses (102 400, 64 857–161 676), with two 15 μg doses (74 725, 51 300–108 847), with two 45 μg doses (79 586, 55 430–114 268), only a single 45 μg dose (4795, 2858–8043). At day 57, 67 (99%) of 68 participants who received two doses of sclamp vaccine at any concentration produced a neutralising immune response, compared with six (25%) of 24 who received a single 45 μg dose and none of 22 who received placebo. Participants receiving two doses of sclamp vaccine elicited similar neutralisation titres, irrespective of dose: two 5 μg doses (GMT 228, 95% CI 146–356), two 15 μg doses (230, 170–312), and two 45 μg doses (239, 187–307). INTERPRETATION: This first-in-human trial shows that a subunit vaccine comprising mammalian cell culture-derived, MF59-adjuvanted, molecular clamp-stabilised recombinant spike protein elicits strong immune responses with a promising safety profile. However, the glycoprotein 41 peptide present in the clamp created HIV diagnostic assay interference, a possible barrier to widespread use highlighting the criticality of potential non-spike directed immunogenicity during vaccine development. Studies are ongoing with alternative molecular clamp trimerisation domains to ameliorate this response. FUNDING: Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, National Health and Medical Research Council, Queensland Government, and further philanthropic sources listed in the acknowledgments. Elsevier Ltd. 2021-10 2021-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8055208/ /pubmed/33887208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00200-0 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Articles Chappell, Keith J Mordant, Francesca L Li, Zheyi Wijesundara, Danushka K Ellenberg, Paula Lackenby, Julia A Cheung, Stacey T M Modhiran, Naphak Avumegah, Michael S Henderson, Christina L Hoger, Kym Griffin, Paul Bennet, Jillian Hensen, Luca Zhang, Wuji Nguyen, Thi H O Marrero-Hernandez, Sara Selva, Kevin J Chung, Amy W Tran, Mai H Tapley, Peter Barnes, James Reading, Patrick C Nicholson, Suellen Corby, Stavroula Holgate, Thomas Wines, Bruce D Hogarth, P Mark Kedzierska, Katherine Purcell, Damian F J Ranasinghe, Charani Subbarao, Kanta Watterson, Daniel Young, Paul R Munro, Trent P Safety and immunogenicity of an MF59-adjuvanted spike glycoprotein-clamp vaccine for SARS-CoV-2: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial |
title | Safety and immunogenicity of an MF59-adjuvanted spike glycoprotein-clamp vaccine for SARS-CoV-2: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial |
title_full | Safety and immunogenicity of an MF59-adjuvanted spike glycoprotein-clamp vaccine for SARS-CoV-2: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial |
title_fullStr | Safety and immunogenicity of an MF59-adjuvanted spike glycoprotein-clamp vaccine for SARS-CoV-2: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and immunogenicity of an MF59-adjuvanted spike glycoprotein-clamp vaccine for SARS-CoV-2: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial |
title_short | Safety and immunogenicity of an MF59-adjuvanted spike glycoprotein-clamp vaccine for SARS-CoV-2: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial |
title_sort | safety and immunogenicity of an mf59-adjuvanted spike glycoprotein-clamp vaccine for sars-cov-2: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33887208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00200-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chappellkeithj safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT mordantfrancescal safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT lizheyi safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT wijesundaradanushkak safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT ellenbergpaula safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT lackenbyjuliaa safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT cheungstaceytm safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT modhirannaphak safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT avumegahmichaels safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT hendersonchristinal safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT hogerkym safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT griffinpaul safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT bennetjillian safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT hensenluca safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT zhangwuji safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT nguyenthiho safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT marrerohernandezsara safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT selvakevinj safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT chungamyw safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT tranmaih safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT tapleypeter safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT barnesjames safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT readingpatrickc safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT nicholsonsuellen safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT corbystavroula safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT holgatethomas safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT winesbruced safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT hogarthpmark safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT kedzierskakatherine safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT purcelldamianfj safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT ranasinghecharani safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT subbaraokanta safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT wattersondaniel safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT youngpaulr safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial AT munrotrentp safetyandimmunogenicityofanmf59adjuvantedspikeglycoproteinclampvaccineforsarscov2arandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase1trial |