Cargando…
Evaluating recommender systems for AI-driven biomedical informatics
MOTIVATION: Many researchers with domain expertise are unable to easily apply machine learning (ML) to their bioinformatics data due to a lack of ML and/or coding expertise. Methods that have been proposed thus far to automate ML mostly require programming experience as well as expert knowledge to t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32766825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa698 |
_version_ | 1783680412650831872 |
---|---|
author | La Cava, William Williams, Heather Fu, Weixuan Vitale, Steve Srivatsan, Durga Moore, Jason H |
author_facet | La Cava, William Williams, Heather Fu, Weixuan Vitale, Steve Srivatsan, Durga Moore, Jason H |
author_sort | La Cava, William |
collection | PubMed |
description | MOTIVATION: Many researchers with domain expertise are unable to easily apply machine learning (ML) to their bioinformatics data due to a lack of ML and/or coding expertise. Methods that have been proposed thus far to automate ML mostly require programming experience as well as expert knowledge to tune and apply the algorithms correctly. Here, we study a method of automating biomedical data science using a web-based AI platform to recommend model choices and conduct experiments. We have two goals in mind: first, to make it easy to construct sophisticated models of biomedical processes; and second, to provide a fully automated AI agent that can choose and conduct promising experiments for the user, based on the user’s experiments as well as prior knowledge. To validate this framework, we conduct an experiment on 165 classification problems, comparing to state-of-the-art, automated approaches. Finally, we use this tool to develop predictive models of septic shock in critical care patients. RESULTS: We find that matrix factorization-based recommendation systems outperform metalearning methods for automating ML. This result mirrors the results of earlier recommender systems research in other domains. The proposed AI is competitive with state-of-the-art automated ML methods in terms of choosing optimal algorithm configurations for datasets. In our application to prediction of septic shock, the AI-driven analysis produces a competent ML model (AUROC 0.85±0.02) that performs on par with state-of-the-art deep learning results for this task, with much less computational effort. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PennAI is available free of charge and open-source. It is distributed under the GNU public license (GPL) version 3. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8055228 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80552282021-04-28 Evaluating recommender systems for AI-driven biomedical informatics La Cava, William Williams, Heather Fu, Weixuan Vitale, Steve Srivatsan, Durga Moore, Jason H Bioinformatics Original Papers MOTIVATION: Many researchers with domain expertise are unable to easily apply machine learning (ML) to their bioinformatics data due to a lack of ML and/or coding expertise. Methods that have been proposed thus far to automate ML mostly require programming experience as well as expert knowledge to tune and apply the algorithms correctly. Here, we study a method of automating biomedical data science using a web-based AI platform to recommend model choices and conduct experiments. We have two goals in mind: first, to make it easy to construct sophisticated models of biomedical processes; and second, to provide a fully automated AI agent that can choose and conduct promising experiments for the user, based on the user’s experiments as well as prior knowledge. To validate this framework, we conduct an experiment on 165 classification problems, comparing to state-of-the-art, automated approaches. Finally, we use this tool to develop predictive models of septic shock in critical care patients. RESULTS: We find that matrix factorization-based recommendation systems outperform metalearning methods for automating ML. This result mirrors the results of earlier recommender systems research in other domains. The proposed AI is competitive with state-of-the-art automated ML methods in terms of choosing optimal algorithm configurations for datasets. In our application to prediction of septic shock, the AI-driven analysis produces a competent ML model (AUROC 0.85±0.02) that performs on par with state-of-the-art deep learning results for this task, with much less computational effort. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PennAI is available free of charge and open-source. It is distributed under the GNU public license (GPL) version 3. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Oxford University Press 2020-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8055228/ /pubmed/32766825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa698 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Papers La Cava, William Williams, Heather Fu, Weixuan Vitale, Steve Srivatsan, Durga Moore, Jason H Evaluating recommender systems for AI-driven biomedical informatics |
title | Evaluating recommender systems for AI-driven biomedical informatics |
title_full | Evaluating recommender systems for AI-driven biomedical informatics |
title_fullStr | Evaluating recommender systems for AI-driven biomedical informatics |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating recommender systems for AI-driven biomedical informatics |
title_short | Evaluating recommender systems for AI-driven biomedical informatics |
title_sort | evaluating recommender systems for ai-driven biomedical informatics |
topic | Original Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32766825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa698 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lacavawilliam evaluatingrecommendersystemsforaidrivenbiomedicalinformatics AT williamsheather evaluatingrecommendersystemsforaidrivenbiomedicalinformatics AT fuweixuan evaluatingrecommendersystemsforaidrivenbiomedicalinformatics AT vitalesteve evaluatingrecommendersystemsforaidrivenbiomedicalinformatics AT srivatsandurga evaluatingrecommendersystemsforaidrivenbiomedicalinformatics AT moorejasonh evaluatingrecommendersystemsforaidrivenbiomedicalinformatics |