Cargando…
Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in COPD: An Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data
BACKGROUND: The influence of peak inspiratory flow (PIF) on dose delivery from dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and association with treatment efficacy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has not been fully determined. In vitro studies have demonstrated adequate dose delivery thr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33883890 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S291554 |
_version_ | 1783680420885299200 |
---|---|
author | Anderson, Martin Collison, Kathryn Drummond, M Bradley Hamilton, Melanie Jain, Renu Martin, Neil Mularski, Richard A Thomas, Mike Zhu, Chang-Qing Ferguson, Gary T |
author_facet | Anderson, Martin Collison, Kathryn Drummond, M Bradley Hamilton, Melanie Jain, Renu Martin, Neil Mularski, Richard A Thomas, Mike Zhu, Chang-Qing Ferguson, Gary T |
author_sort | Anderson, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The influence of peak inspiratory flow (PIF) on dose delivery from dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and association with treatment efficacy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has not been fully determined. In vitro studies have demonstrated adequate dose delivery through ELLIPTA DPI at PIF ≥30 L/min. This analysis of two clinical trials and a real-world population of COPD patients determined spirometric PIF distribution, and explored the relationship between PIF and outcomes in the trials. METHODS: The replicate Phase IV, 12-week, randomized, double-blind 207608/207609 (NCT03478683/NCT03478696) trials evaluated fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol via ELLIPTA DPI versus budesonide/formoterol+tiotropium in COPD patients. This post hoc analysis assessed spirometric PIF distribution at screening and relationship between PIF and lung function outcomes in the pooled 207608/207609 population. Spirometric PIF distributions in a real-world population of COPD patients were evaluated by retrospective analysis of the Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) database to assess similarities between clinical trial and real-world populations. RESULTS: A total of 1460 (207608/207609) and 3282 (KPNW) patients were included. There was considerable overlap between spirometric PIF distributions for both populations. Overall, 99.7% and 99.8% of the 207608/207609 and KPNW populations, respectively, reported spirometric PIF ≥50 L/min, estimated as equivalent to ELLIPTA PIFR ≥30 L/min. In the 207608/207609 combined analysis, there was no significant interaction between spirometric PIF and treatment for lung function endpoints, indicating treatment effect is independent of PIF. CONCLUSION: Nearly all COPD patients in the 207608/207609 and KPNW populations achieved spirometric PIF values estimated as equivalent to PIFR of ≥30 L/min through the ELLIPTA DPI. Lack of correlation between spirometric PIF at screening and treatment efficacy aligns with consistent dose performance from the ELLIPTA DPI across a wide range of PIFs, achieved by patients with COPD of all severities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8055277 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80552772021-04-20 Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in COPD: An Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data Anderson, Martin Collison, Kathryn Drummond, M Bradley Hamilton, Melanie Jain, Renu Martin, Neil Mularski, Richard A Thomas, Mike Zhu, Chang-Qing Ferguson, Gary T Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: The influence of peak inspiratory flow (PIF) on dose delivery from dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and association with treatment efficacy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has not been fully determined. In vitro studies have demonstrated adequate dose delivery through ELLIPTA DPI at PIF ≥30 L/min. This analysis of two clinical trials and a real-world population of COPD patients determined spirometric PIF distribution, and explored the relationship between PIF and outcomes in the trials. METHODS: The replicate Phase IV, 12-week, randomized, double-blind 207608/207609 (NCT03478683/NCT03478696) trials evaluated fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol via ELLIPTA DPI versus budesonide/formoterol+tiotropium in COPD patients. This post hoc analysis assessed spirometric PIF distribution at screening and relationship between PIF and lung function outcomes in the pooled 207608/207609 population. Spirometric PIF distributions in a real-world population of COPD patients were evaluated by retrospective analysis of the Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) database to assess similarities between clinical trial and real-world populations. RESULTS: A total of 1460 (207608/207609) and 3282 (KPNW) patients were included. There was considerable overlap between spirometric PIF distributions for both populations. Overall, 99.7% and 99.8% of the 207608/207609 and KPNW populations, respectively, reported spirometric PIF ≥50 L/min, estimated as equivalent to ELLIPTA PIFR ≥30 L/min. In the 207608/207609 combined analysis, there was no significant interaction between spirometric PIF and treatment for lung function endpoints, indicating treatment effect is independent of PIF. CONCLUSION: Nearly all COPD patients in the 207608/207609 and KPNW populations achieved spirometric PIF values estimated as equivalent to PIFR of ≥30 L/min through the ELLIPTA DPI. Lack of correlation between spirometric PIF at screening and treatment efficacy aligns with consistent dose performance from the ELLIPTA DPI across a wide range of PIFs, achieved by patients with COPD of all severities. Dove 2021-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8055277/ /pubmed/33883890 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S291554 Text en © 2021 Anderson et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Anderson, Martin Collison, Kathryn Drummond, M Bradley Hamilton, Melanie Jain, Renu Martin, Neil Mularski, Richard A Thomas, Mike Zhu, Chang-Qing Ferguson, Gary T Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in COPD: An Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data |
title | Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in COPD: An Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data |
title_full | Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in COPD: An Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data |
title_fullStr | Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in COPD: An Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in COPD: An Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data |
title_short | Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in COPD: An Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data |
title_sort | peak inspiratory flow rate in copd: an analysis of clinical trial and real-world data |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33883890 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S291554 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andersonmartin peakinspiratoryflowrateincopdananalysisofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata AT collisonkathryn peakinspiratoryflowrateincopdananalysisofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata AT drummondmbradley peakinspiratoryflowrateincopdananalysisofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata AT hamiltonmelanie peakinspiratoryflowrateincopdananalysisofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata AT jainrenu peakinspiratoryflowrateincopdananalysisofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata AT martinneil peakinspiratoryflowrateincopdananalysisofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata AT mularskiricharda peakinspiratoryflowrateincopdananalysisofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata AT thomasmike peakinspiratoryflowrateincopdananalysisofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata AT zhuchangqing peakinspiratoryflowrateincopdananalysisofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata AT fergusongaryt peakinspiratoryflowrateincopdananalysisofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata |