Cargando…

Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in COPD: An Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data

BACKGROUND: The influence of peak inspiratory flow (PIF) on dose delivery from dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and association with treatment efficacy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has not been fully determined. In vitro studies have demonstrated adequate dose delivery thr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, Martin, Collison, Kathryn, Drummond, M Bradley, Hamilton, Melanie, Jain, Renu, Martin, Neil, Mularski, Richard A, Thomas, Mike, Zhu, Chang-Qing, Ferguson, Gary T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33883890
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S291554
_version_ 1783680420885299200
author Anderson, Martin
Collison, Kathryn
Drummond, M Bradley
Hamilton, Melanie
Jain, Renu
Martin, Neil
Mularski, Richard A
Thomas, Mike
Zhu, Chang-Qing
Ferguson, Gary T
author_facet Anderson, Martin
Collison, Kathryn
Drummond, M Bradley
Hamilton, Melanie
Jain, Renu
Martin, Neil
Mularski, Richard A
Thomas, Mike
Zhu, Chang-Qing
Ferguson, Gary T
author_sort Anderson, Martin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The influence of peak inspiratory flow (PIF) on dose delivery from dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and association with treatment efficacy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has not been fully determined. In vitro studies have demonstrated adequate dose delivery through ELLIPTA DPI at PIF ≥30 L/min. This analysis of two clinical trials and a real-world population of COPD patients determined spirometric PIF distribution, and explored the relationship between PIF and outcomes in the trials. METHODS: The replicate Phase IV, 12-week, randomized, double-blind 207608/207609 (NCT03478683/NCT03478696) trials evaluated fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol via ELLIPTA DPI versus budesonide/formoterol+tiotropium in COPD patients. This post hoc analysis assessed spirometric PIF distribution at screening and relationship between PIF and lung function outcomes in the pooled 207608/207609 population. Spirometric PIF distributions in a real-world population of COPD patients were evaluated by retrospective analysis of the Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) database to assess similarities between clinical trial and real-world populations. RESULTS: A total of 1460 (207608/207609) and 3282 (KPNW) patients were included. There was considerable overlap between spirometric PIF distributions for both populations. Overall, 99.7% and 99.8% of the 207608/207609 and KPNW populations, respectively, reported spirometric PIF ≥50 L/min, estimated as equivalent to ELLIPTA PIFR ≥30 L/min. In the 207608/207609 combined analysis, there was no significant interaction between spirometric PIF and treatment for lung function endpoints, indicating treatment effect is independent of PIF. CONCLUSION: Nearly all COPD patients in the 207608/207609 and KPNW populations achieved spirometric PIF values estimated as equivalent to PIFR of ≥30 L/min through the ELLIPTA DPI. Lack of correlation between spirometric PIF at screening and treatment efficacy aligns with consistent dose performance from the ELLIPTA DPI across a wide range of PIFs, achieved by patients with COPD of all severities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8055277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80552772021-04-20 Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in COPD: An Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data Anderson, Martin Collison, Kathryn Drummond, M Bradley Hamilton, Melanie Jain, Renu Martin, Neil Mularski, Richard A Thomas, Mike Zhu, Chang-Qing Ferguson, Gary T Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: The influence of peak inspiratory flow (PIF) on dose delivery from dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and association with treatment efficacy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has not been fully determined. In vitro studies have demonstrated adequate dose delivery through ELLIPTA DPI at PIF ≥30 L/min. This analysis of two clinical trials and a real-world population of COPD patients determined spirometric PIF distribution, and explored the relationship between PIF and outcomes in the trials. METHODS: The replicate Phase IV, 12-week, randomized, double-blind 207608/207609 (NCT03478683/NCT03478696) trials evaluated fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol via ELLIPTA DPI versus budesonide/formoterol+tiotropium in COPD patients. This post hoc analysis assessed spirometric PIF distribution at screening and relationship between PIF and lung function outcomes in the pooled 207608/207609 population. Spirometric PIF distributions in a real-world population of COPD patients were evaluated by retrospective analysis of the Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) database to assess similarities between clinical trial and real-world populations. RESULTS: A total of 1460 (207608/207609) and 3282 (KPNW) patients were included. There was considerable overlap between spirometric PIF distributions for both populations. Overall, 99.7% and 99.8% of the 207608/207609 and KPNW populations, respectively, reported spirometric PIF ≥50 L/min, estimated as equivalent to ELLIPTA PIFR ≥30 L/min. In the 207608/207609 combined analysis, there was no significant interaction between spirometric PIF and treatment for lung function endpoints, indicating treatment effect is independent of PIF. CONCLUSION: Nearly all COPD patients in the 207608/207609 and KPNW populations achieved spirometric PIF values estimated as equivalent to PIFR of ≥30 L/min through the ELLIPTA DPI. Lack of correlation between spirometric PIF at screening and treatment efficacy aligns with consistent dose performance from the ELLIPTA DPI across a wide range of PIFs, achieved by patients with COPD of all severities. Dove 2021-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8055277/ /pubmed/33883890 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S291554 Text en © 2021 Anderson et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Anderson, Martin
Collison, Kathryn
Drummond, M Bradley
Hamilton, Melanie
Jain, Renu
Martin, Neil
Mularski, Richard A
Thomas, Mike
Zhu, Chang-Qing
Ferguson, Gary T
Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in COPD: An Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data
title Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in COPD: An Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data
title_full Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in COPD: An Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data
title_fullStr Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in COPD: An Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data
title_full_unstemmed Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in COPD: An Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data
title_short Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in COPD: An Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data
title_sort peak inspiratory flow rate in copd: an analysis of clinical trial and real-world data
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33883890
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S291554
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonmartin peakinspiratoryflowrateincopdananalysisofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata
AT collisonkathryn peakinspiratoryflowrateincopdananalysisofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata
AT drummondmbradley peakinspiratoryflowrateincopdananalysisofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata
AT hamiltonmelanie peakinspiratoryflowrateincopdananalysisofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata
AT jainrenu peakinspiratoryflowrateincopdananalysisofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata
AT martinneil peakinspiratoryflowrateincopdananalysisofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata
AT mularskiricharda peakinspiratoryflowrateincopdananalysisofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata
AT thomasmike peakinspiratoryflowrateincopdananalysisofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata
AT zhuchangqing peakinspiratoryflowrateincopdananalysisofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata
AT fergusongaryt peakinspiratoryflowrateincopdananalysisofclinicaltrialandrealworlddata