Cargando…
Blood Pressure Response and Vascular Function of Professional Athletes and Controls
Workload-indexed blood pressure response (wiBPR) to exercise has been shown to be superior to peak systolic blood pressure (SBP) in predicting mortality in healthy men. Thus far, however, markers of wiBPR have not been evaluated for athletes and the association with vascular function is unclear. We...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1400-1897 |
_version_ | 1783680436748156928 |
---|---|
author | Bauer, Pascal Kraushaar, Lutz Hoelscher, Sophie Weber, Rebecca Akdogan, Ebru Keranov, Stanislav Dörr, Oliver Nef, Holger Hamm, Christian W Most, Astrid |
author_facet | Bauer, Pascal Kraushaar, Lutz Hoelscher, Sophie Weber, Rebecca Akdogan, Ebru Keranov, Stanislav Dörr, Oliver Nef, Holger Hamm, Christian W Most, Astrid |
author_sort | Bauer, Pascal |
collection | PubMed |
description | Workload-indexed blood pressure response (wiBPR) to exercise has been shown to be superior to peak systolic blood pressure (SBP) in predicting mortality in healthy men. Thus far, however, markers of wiBPR have not been evaluated for athletes and the association with vascular function is unclear. We examined 95 male professional athletes (26±5 y) and 30 male controls (26±4 y). We assessed vascular functional parameters at rest and wiBPR with a graded bicycle ergometer test and compared values for athletes with those of controls. Athletes had a lower pulse wave velocity (6.4±0.9 vs. 7.2±1.5 m/s, p=0.001) compared to controls. SBP/Watt slope (0.34±0.13 vs. 0.44±0.12 mmHg/W), SBP/MET slope (6.2±1.8 vs. 7.85±1.8 mmHg/MET) and peak SBP/Watt ratio (0.61±0.12 vs. 0.95±0.17 mmHg/W) were lower in athletes than in controls (p<0.001). The SBP/Watt and SBP/MET slope in athletes were comparable to the reference values, whereas the peak SBP/Watt-ratio was lower. All vascular functional parameters measured were not significantly correlated to the wiBPR in either athletes or controls. In conclusion, our findings indicate the potential use of the SBP/Watt and SBP/MET slope in pre-participation screening of athletes. Further, vascular functional parameters, measured at rest, were unrelated to the wiBPR in athletes and controls. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8055378 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80553782021-04-21 Blood Pressure Response and Vascular Function of Professional Athletes and Controls Bauer, Pascal Kraushaar, Lutz Hoelscher, Sophie Weber, Rebecca Akdogan, Ebru Keranov, Stanislav Dörr, Oliver Nef, Holger Hamm, Christian W Most, Astrid Sports Med Int Open Workload-indexed blood pressure response (wiBPR) to exercise has been shown to be superior to peak systolic blood pressure (SBP) in predicting mortality in healthy men. Thus far, however, markers of wiBPR have not been evaluated for athletes and the association with vascular function is unclear. We examined 95 male professional athletes (26±5 y) and 30 male controls (26±4 y). We assessed vascular functional parameters at rest and wiBPR with a graded bicycle ergometer test and compared values for athletes with those of controls. Athletes had a lower pulse wave velocity (6.4±0.9 vs. 7.2±1.5 m/s, p=0.001) compared to controls. SBP/Watt slope (0.34±0.13 vs. 0.44±0.12 mmHg/W), SBP/MET slope (6.2±1.8 vs. 7.85±1.8 mmHg/MET) and peak SBP/Watt ratio (0.61±0.12 vs. 0.95±0.17 mmHg/W) were lower in athletes than in controls (p<0.001). The SBP/Watt and SBP/MET slope in athletes were comparable to the reference values, whereas the peak SBP/Watt-ratio was lower. All vascular functional parameters measured were not significantly correlated to the wiBPR in either athletes or controls. In conclusion, our findings indicate the potential use of the SBP/Watt and SBP/MET slope in pre-participation screening of athletes. Further, vascular functional parameters, measured at rest, were unrelated to the wiBPR in athletes and controls. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8055378/ /pubmed/33889714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1400-1897 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Bauer, Pascal Kraushaar, Lutz Hoelscher, Sophie Weber, Rebecca Akdogan, Ebru Keranov, Stanislav Dörr, Oliver Nef, Holger Hamm, Christian W Most, Astrid Blood Pressure Response and Vascular Function of Professional Athletes and Controls |
title | Blood Pressure Response and Vascular Function of Professional
Athletes and Controls |
title_full | Blood Pressure Response and Vascular Function of Professional
Athletes and Controls |
title_fullStr | Blood Pressure Response and Vascular Function of Professional
Athletes and Controls |
title_full_unstemmed | Blood Pressure Response and Vascular Function of Professional
Athletes and Controls |
title_short | Blood Pressure Response and Vascular Function of Professional
Athletes and Controls |
title_sort | blood pressure response and vascular function of professional
athletes and controls |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1400-1897 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bauerpascal bloodpressureresponseandvascularfunctionofprofessionalathletesandcontrols AT kraushaarlutz bloodpressureresponseandvascularfunctionofprofessionalathletesandcontrols AT hoelschersophie bloodpressureresponseandvascularfunctionofprofessionalathletesandcontrols AT weberrebecca bloodpressureresponseandvascularfunctionofprofessionalathletesandcontrols AT akdoganebru bloodpressureresponseandvascularfunctionofprofessionalathletesandcontrols AT keranovstanislav bloodpressureresponseandvascularfunctionofprofessionalathletesandcontrols AT dorroliver bloodpressureresponseandvascularfunctionofprofessionalathletesandcontrols AT nefholger bloodpressureresponseandvascularfunctionofprofessionalathletesandcontrols AT hammchristianw bloodpressureresponseandvascularfunctionofprofessionalathletesandcontrols AT mostastrid bloodpressureresponseandvascularfunctionofprofessionalathletesandcontrols |