Cargando…

Blood Pressure Response and Vascular Function of Professional Athletes and Controls

Workload-indexed blood pressure response (wiBPR) to exercise has been shown to be superior to peak systolic blood pressure (SBP) in predicting mortality in healthy men. Thus far, however, markers of wiBPR have not been evaluated for athletes and the association with vascular function is unclear. We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bauer, Pascal, Kraushaar, Lutz, Hoelscher, Sophie, Weber, Rebecca, Akdogan, Ebru, Keranov, Stanislav, Dörr, Oliver, Nef, Holger, Hamm, Christian W, Most, Astrid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1400-1897
_version_ 1783680436748156928
author Bauer, Pascal
Kraushaar, Lutz
Hoelscher, Sophie
Weber, Rebecca
Akdogan, Ebru
Keranov, Stanislav
Dörr, Oliver
Nef, Holger
Hamm, Christian W
Most, Astrid
author_facet Bauer, Pascal
Kraushaar, Lutz
Hoelscher, Sophie
Weber, Rebecca
Akdogan, Ebru
Keranov, Stanislav
Dörr, Oliver
Nef, Holger
Hamm, Christian W
Most, Astrid
author_sort Bauer, Pascal
collection PubMed
description Workload-indexed blood pressure response (wiBPR) to exercise has been shown to be superior to peak systolic blood pressure (SBP) in predicting mortality in healthy men. Thus far, however, markers of wiBPR have not been evaluated for athletes and the association with vascular function is unclear. We examined 95 male professional athletes (26±5 y) and 30 male controls (26±4 y). We assessed vascular functional parameters at rest and wiBPR with a graded bicycle ergometer test and compared values for athletes with those of controls. Athletes had a lower pulse wave velocity (6.4±0.9 vs. 7.2±1.5 m/s, p=0.001) compared to controls. SBP/Watt slope (0.34±0.13 vs. 0.44±0.12 mmHg/W), SBP/MET slope (6.2±1.8 vs. 7.85±1.8 mmHg/MET) and peak SBP/Watt ratio (0.61±0.12 vs. 0.95±0.17 mmHg/W) were lower in athletes than in controls (p<0.001). The SBP/Watt and SBP/MET slope in athletes were comparable to the reference values, whereas the peak SBP/Watt-ratio was lower. All vascular functional parameters measured were not significantly correlated to the wiBPR in either athletes or controls. In conclusion, our findings indicate the potential use of the SBP/Watt and SBP/MET slope in pre-participation screening of athletes. Further, vascular functional parameters, measured at rest, were unrelated to the wiBPR in athletes and controls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8055378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80553782021-04-21 Blood Pressure Response and Vascular Function of Professional Athletes and Controls Bauer, Pascal Kraushaar, Lutz Hoelscher, Sophie Weber, Rebecca Akdogan, Ebru Keranov, Stanislav Dörr, Oliver Nef, Holger Hamm, Christian W Most, Astrid Sports Med Int Open Workload-indexed blood pressure response (wiBPR) to exercise has been shown to be superior to peak systolic blood pressure (SBP) in predicting mortality in healthy men. Thus far, however, markers of wiBPR have not been evaluated for athletes and the association with vascular function is unclear. We examined 95 male professional athletes (26±5 y) and 30 male controls (26±4 y). We assessed vascular functional parameters at rest and wiBPR with a graded bicycle ergometer test and compared values for athletes with those of controls. Athletes had a lower pulse wave velocity (6.4±0.9 vs. 7.2±1.5 m/s, p=0.001) compared to controls. SBP/Watt slope (0.34±0.13 vs. 0.44±0.12 mmHg/W), SBP/MET slope (6.2±1.8 vs. 7.85±1.8 mmHg/MET) and peak SBP/Watt ratio (0.61±0.12 vs. 0.95±0.17 mmHg/W) were lower in athletes than in controls (p<0.001). The SBP/Watt and SBP/MET slope in athletes were comparable to the reference values, whereas the peak SBP/Watt-ratio was lower. All vascular functional parameters measured were not significantly correlated to the wiBPR in either athletes or controls. In conclusion, our findings indicate the potential use of the SBP/Watt and SBP/MET slope in pre-participation screening of athletes. Further, vascular functional parameters, measured at rest, were unrelated to the wiBPR in athletes and controls. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8055378/ /pubmed/33889714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1400-1897 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Bauer, Pascal
Kraushaar, Lutz
Hoelscher, Sophie
Weber, Rebecca
Akdogan, Ebru
Keranov, Stanislav
Dörr, Oliver
Nef, Holger
Hamm, Christian W
Most, Astrid
Blood Pressure Response and Vascular Function of Professional Athletes and Controls
title Blood Pressure Response and Vascular Function of Professional Athletes and Controls
title_full Blood Pressure Response and Vascular Function of Professional Athletes and Controls
title_fullStr Blood Pressure Response and Vascular Function of Professional Athletes and Controls
title_full_unstemmed Blood Pressure Response and Vascular Function of Professional Athletes and Controls
title_short Blood Pressure Response and Vascular Function of Professional Athletes and Controls
title_sort blood pressure response and vascular function of professional athletes and controls
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1400-1897
work_keys_str_mv AT bauerpascal bloodpressureresponseandvascularfunctionofprofessionalathletesandcontrols
AT kraushaarlutz bloodpressureresponseandvascularfunctionofprofessionalathletesandcontrols
AT hoelschersophie bloodpressureresponseandvascularfunctionofprofessionalathletesandcontrols
AT weberrebecca bloodpressureresponseandvascularfunctionofprofessionalathletesandcontrols
AT akdoganebru bloodpressureresponseandvascularfunctionofprofessionalathletesandcontrols
AT keranovstanislav bloodpressureresponseandvascularfunctionofprofessionalathletesandcontrols
AT dorroliver bloodpressureresponseandvascularfunctionofprofessionalathletesandcontrols
AT nefholger bloodpressureresponseandvascularfunctionofprofessionalathletesandcontrols
AT hammchristianw bloodpressureresponseandvascularfunctionofprofessionalathletesandcontrols
AT mostastrid bloodpressureresponseandvascularfunctionofprofessionalathletesandcontrols