Cargando…

A Bioinformatic Analysis of Correlations between Polymeric Immunoglobulin Receptor (PIGR) and Liver Fibrosis Progression

OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed at investigating the enriched functions of polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (PIGR) and its correlations with liver fibrosis stage. METHODS: PIGR mRNA expression in normal liver, liver fibrosis, hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), and hepatitis virus infection samples was c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yuan, Lu, Wenjun, Chen, Xiaorong, Cao, Yajuan, Yang, Zongguo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5541780
_version_ 1783680442427244544
author Zhang, Yuan
Lu, Wenjun
Chen, Xiaorong
Cao, Yajuan
Yang, Zongguo
author_facet Zhang, Yuan
Lu, Wenjun
Chen, Xiaorong
Cao, Yajuan
Yang, Zongguo
author_sort Zhang, Yuan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed at investigating the enriched functions of polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (PIGR) and its correlations with liver fibrosis stage. METHODS: PIGR mRNA expression in normal liver, liver fibrosis, hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), and hepatitis virus infection samples was calculated in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and Oncomine databases. Enrichment analysis of PIGR-related genes was conducted in Metascape and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). Logistic model and ROC curve were performed to evaluate the correlations between pIgR and liver fibrosis. RESULTS: PIGR mRNA was upregulated in advanced liver fibrosis, cirrhosis compared to normal liver (all p < 0.05). PIGR mRNA was also overexpressed in activated HSCs compared to senescent HSCs, liver stem/progenitor cells, and reverted HSCs (all p < 0.05). Enrichment analysis revealed that PIGR-related genes involved in the defense response to virus and interferon (IFN) signaling. In GEO series, PIGR mRNA was also upregulated by hepatitis virus B, C, D, and E infection (all p < 0.05). After adjusting age and gender, multivariate logistic regression models revealed that high PIGR in the liver was a risk factor for liver fibrosis (OR = 82.2, p < 0.001). The area under curve (AUC), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, and specificity of PIGR for liver fibrosis stage >2 were 0.84, 0.86, 0.7, 0.61, and 0.90. CONCLUSION: PIGR was correlated with liver fibrosis and might involve in hepatitis virus infection and HSC transdifferentiation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8055406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80554062021-04-29 A Bioinformatic Analysis of Correlations between Polymeric Immunoglobulin Receptor (PIGR) and Liver Fibrosis Progression Zhang, Yuan Lu, Wenjun Chen, Xiaorong Cao, Yajuan Yang, Zongguo Biomed Res Int Research Article OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed at investigating the enriched functions of polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (PIGR) and its correlations with liver fibrosis stage. METHODS: PIGR mRNA expression in normal liver, liver fibrosis, hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), and hepatitis virus infection samples was calculated in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and Oncomine databases. Enrichment analysis of PIGR-related genes was conducted in Metascape and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). Logistic model and ROC curve were performed to evaluate the correlations between pIgR and liver fibrosis. RESULTS: PIGR mRNA was upregulated in advanced liver fibrosis, cirrhosis compared to normal liver (all p < 0.05). PIGR mRNA was also overexpressed in activated HSCs compared to senescent HSCs, liver stem/progenitor cells, and reverted HSCs (all p < 0.05). Enrichment analysis revealed that PIGR-related genes involved in the defense response to virus and interferon (IFN) signaling. In GEO series, PIGR mRNA was also upregulated by hepatitis virus B, C, D, and E infection (all p < 0.05). After adjusting age and gender, multivariate logistic regression models revealed that high PIGR in the liver was a risk factor for liver fibrosis (OR = 82.2, p < 0.001). The area under curve (AUC), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, and specificity of PIGR for liver fibrosis stage >2 were 0.84, 0.86, 0.7, 0.61, and 0.90. CONCLUSION: PIGR was correlated with liver fibrosis and might involve in hepatitis virus infection and HSC transdifferentiation. Hindawi 2021-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8055406/ /pubmed/33937393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5541780 Text en Copyright © 2021 Yuan Zhang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Yuan
Lu, Wenjun
Chen, Xiaorong
Cao, Yajuan
Yang, Zongguo
A Bioinformatic Analysis of Correlations between Polymeric Immunoglobulin Receptor (PIGR) and Liver Fibrosis Progression
title A Bioinformatic Analysis of Correlations between Polymeric Immunoglobulin Receptor (PIGR) and Liver Fibrosis Progression
title_full A Bioinformatic Analysis of Correlations between Polymeric Immunoglobulin Receptor (PIGR) and Liver Fibrosis Progression
title_fullStr A Bioinformatic Analysis of Correlations between Polymeric Immunoglobulin Receptor (PIGR) and Liver Fibrosis Progression
title_full_unstemmed A Bioinformatic Analysis of Correlations between Polymeric Immunoglobulin Receptor (PIGR) and Liver Fibrosis Progression
title_short A Bioinformatic Analysis of Correlations between Polymeric Immunoglobulin Receptor (PIGR) and Liver Fibrosis Progression
title_sort bioinformatic analysis of correlations between polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (pigr) and liver fibrosis progression
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5541780
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyuan abioinformaticanalysisofcorrelationsbetweenpolymericimmunoglobulinreceptorpigrandliverfibrosisprogression
AT luwenjun abioinformaticanalysisofcorrelationsbetweenpolymericimmunoglobulinreceptorpigrandliverfibrosisprogression
AT chenxiaorong abioinformaticanalysisofcorrelationsbetweenpolymericimmunoglobulinreceptorpigrandliverfibrosisprogression
AT caoyajuan abioinformaticanalysisofcorrelationsbetweenpolymericimmunoglobulinreceptorpigrandliverfibrosisprogression
AT yangzongguo abioinformaticanalysisofcorrelationsbetweenpolymericimmunoglobulinreceptorpigrandliverfibrosisprogression
AT zhangyuan bioinformaticanalysisofcorrelationsbetweenpolymericimmunoglobulinreceptorpigrandliverfibrosisprogression
AT luwenjun bioinformaticanalysisofcorrelationsbetweenpolymericimmunoglobulinreceptorpigrandliverfibrosisprogression
AT chenxiaorong bioinformaticanalysisofcorrelationsbetweenpolymericimmunoglobulinreceptorpigrandliverfibrosisprogression
AT caoyajuan bioinformaticanalysisofcorrelationsbetweenpolymericimmunoglobulinreceptorpigrandliverfibrosisprogression
AT yangzongguo bioinformaticanalysisofcorrelationsbetweenpolymericimmunoglobulinreceptorpigrandliverfibrosisprogression