Cargando…
Bacterial growth and recovery on hospital biometric devices: effect of two types of disinfectants
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the presence of bacterial contamination on biometric identification devices in a public hospital; identify the species of bacteria implicated in the contamination and assess bacterial recovery after the use of 2 types of disinfectants: alcohol 70% and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33884315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000088 |
_version_ | 1783680458255499264 |
---|---|
author | Norton, Pedro Guimarães, João Tiago Pinho, Paulo Ribeiro, Manuela Martins, Natália Mendes, Carlos Pedro |
author_facet | Norton, Pedro Guimarães, João Tiago Pinho, Paulo Ribeiro, Manuela Martins, Natália Mendes, Carlos Pedro |
author_sort | Norton, Pedro |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the presence of bacterial contamination on biometric identification devices in a public hospital; identify the species of bacteria implicated in the contamination and assess bacterial recovery after the use of 2 types of disinfectants: alcohol 70% and isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine. DESIGN: Before and after trial. SETTING: Public hospital, tertiary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: All existing biometric identification devices in the hospital (n = 20). METHODS: Collection of 2 microbiological samples from the fingerprint reading surface of biometric devices immediately before and after applying the solution with alcohol 70% and in separate time periods with isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine. RESULTS: It have been identified 21 different bacterial species in a total of 78 samples, mostly Staphylococcus epidermidis (32 samples) and S aureus (7 samples). S epidermidis was eliminated in 61.5% of the samples after disinfecting with alcohol 70% and in 92.3% of the samples disinfected with isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine. S aureus was eliminated in 33.3% and 100% of the samples, respectively. We found no bacterial growth in 10% of the devices after disinfection with 70% alcohol and in 78.9% of devices after disinfection with isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine. We also found that there was a decrease in the frequency of species isolated after using both disinfection solutions, although isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine appeared to be more effective. CONCLUSIONS: The biometric identification devices used in this hospital seem to be safe regardless of the products used for its cleaning. The majority of the bacteria found are commensal skin microorganisms. We did not find pathogenic bacteria for immunocompetent individuals, in particular methicillin-resistant S aureus. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8055484 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80554842021-04-20 Bacterial growth and recovery on hospital biometric devices: effect of two types of disinfectants Norton, Pedro Guimarães, João Tiago Pinho, Paulo Ribeiro, Manuela Martins, Natália Mendes, Carlos Pedro Porto Biomed J Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the presence of bacterial contamination on biometric identification devices in a public hospital; identify the species of bacteria implicated in the contamination and assess bacterial recovery after the use of 2 types of disinfectants: alcohol 70% and isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine. DESIGN: Before and after trial. SETTING: Public hospital, tertiary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: All existing biometric identification devices in the hospital (n = 20). METHODS: Collection of 2 microbiological samples from the fingerprint reading surface of biometric devices immediately before and after applying the solution with alcohol 70% and in separate time periods with isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine. RESULTS: It have been identified 21 different bacterial species in a total of 78 samples, mostly Staphylococcus epidermidis (32 samples) and S aureus (7 samples). S epidermidis was eliminated in 61.5% of the samples after disinfecting with alcohol 70% and in 92.3% of the samples disinfected with isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine. S aureus was eliminated in 33.3% and 100% of the samples, respectively. We found no bacterial growth in 10% of the devices after disinfection with 70% alcohol and in 78.9% of devices after disinfection with isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine. We also found that there was a decrease in the frequency of species isolated after using both disinfection solutions, although isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine appeared to be more effective. CONCLUSIONS: The biometric identification devices used in this hospital seem to be safe regardless of the products used for its cleaning. The majority of the bacteria found are commensal skin microorganisms. We did not find pathogenic bacteria for immunocompetent individuals, in particular methicillin-resistant S aureus. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8055484/ /pubmed/33884315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000088 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of PBJ-Associação Porto Biomedical/Porto Biomedical Society. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Norton, Pedro Guimarães, João Tiago Pinho, Paulo Ribeiro, Manuela Martins, Natália Mendes, Carlos Pedro Bacterial growth and recovery on hospital biometric devices: effect of two types of disinfectants |
title | Bacterial growth and recovery on hospital biometric devices: effect of two types of disinfectants |
title_full | Bacterial growth and recovery on hospital biometric devices: effect of two types of disinfectants |
title_fullStr | Bacterial growth and recovery on hospital biometric devices: effect of two types of disinfectants |
title_full_unstemmed | Bacterial growth and recovery on hospital biometric devices: effect of two types of disinfectants |
title_short | Bacterial growth and recovery on hospital biometric devices: effect of two types of disinfectants |
title_sort | bacterial growth and recovery on hospital biometric devices: effect of two types of disinfectants |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33884315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000088 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nortonpedro bacterialgrowthandrecoveryonhospitalbiometricdeviceseffectoftwotypesofdisinfectants AT guimaraesjoaotiago bacterialgrowthandrecoveryonhospitalbiometricdeviceseffectoftwotypesofdisinfectants AT pinhopaulo bacterialgrowthandrecoveryonhospitalbiometricdeviceseffectoftwotypesofdisinfectants AT ribeiromanuela bacterialgrowthandrecoveryonhospitalbiometricdeviceseffectoftwotypesofdisinfectants AT martinsnatalia bacterialgrowthandrecoveryonhospitalbiometricdeviceseffectoftwotypesofdisinfectants AT mendescarlospedro bacterialgrowthandrecoveryonhospitalbiometricdeviceseffectoftwotypesofdisinfectants |