Cargando…

COVID-19 related pancreatic cancer surveillance disruptions amongst high-risk individuals

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 pandemic-related disruptions to EUS-based pancreatic cancer surveillance in high-risk individuals remain uncertain. METHODS: Analysis of enrolled participants in the CAPS5 Study, a prospective multicenter study of pancreatic cancer surveillance in high-risk individuals. RESULTS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katona, Bryson W., Mahmud, Nadim, Dbouk, Mohamad, Ahmad, Nuzhat, Chhoda, Ankit, Dudley, Beth, Hayat, Umar, Kwon, Richard S., Lee, Linda S., Rustgi, Anil K., Ukaegbu, Chinedu, Vasquez, Lisa, Volk, Sarah, Brand, Randall E., Canto, Marcia I., Chak, Amitabh, Farrell, James J., Kastrinos, Fay, Stoffel, Elena M., Syngal, Sapna, Goggins, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33926820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2021.04.005
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: COVID-19 pandemic-related disruptions to EUS-based pancreatic cancer surveillance in high-risk individuals remain uncertain. METHODS: Analysis of enrolled participants in the CAPS5 Study, a prospective multicenter study of pancreatic cancer surveillance in high-risk individuals. RESULTS: Amongst 693 enrolled high-risk individuals under active surveillance, 108 (16%) had an EUS scheduled during the COVID-19 pandemic-related shutdown (median length of 78 days) in the spring of 2020, with 97% of these procedures being canceled. Of these canceled surveillance EUSs, 83% were rescheduled in a median of 4.1 months, however 17% were not rescheduled after 6 months follow-up. Prior history of cancer was associated with increased likelihood of rescheduling. To date no pancreatic cancer has been diagnosed among those whose surveillance was delayed. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 delayed pancreatic cancer surveillance with no adverse outcomes in efficiently rescheduled individuals. However, 1 in 6 high-risk individuals had not rescheduled surveillance, indicating the need for vigilance to ensure timely surveillance rescheduling.