Cargando…
Standard versus eversion-modified double-staple technique for low colorectal anastomoses after resection of rectal cancer
PURPOSE: The double-staple technique, performed as either the standard procedure or after eversion of the rectal stump, is a well-established method of performing low colorectal anastomoses following the resection of rectal cancer. Eversion of the tumor-bearing ano-rectal stump was proposed to allow...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33128593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02174-5 |
_version_ | 1783680477671981056 |
---|---|
author | Illuminati, Giulio Pasqua, Rocco Perotti, Bruno Urciuoli, Paolo Nardi, Priscilla Fratini, Chiara Carboni, Fabio Valle, Mario |
author_facet | Illuminati, Giulio Pasqua, Rocco Perotti, Bruno Urciuoli, Paolo Nardi, Priscilla Fratini, Chiara Carboni, Fabio Valle, Mario |
author_sort | Illuminati, Giulio |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The double-staple technique, performed as either the standard procedure or after eversion of the rectal stump, is a well-established method of performing low colorectal anastomoses following the resection of rectal cancer. Eversion of the tumor-bearing ano-rectal stump was proposed to allow the linear stapler to be fired at a safe distance of clearance from the tumor. We conducted this study to compare the results of the standard versus the eversion-modified double-staple technique. METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective study were 753 consecutive patients who underwent low stapled colorectal anastomosis after resection of rectal cancer. The patients were divided into two groups according to the method of anastomosis used: Group A comprised 165 patients (22%) treated with the modified eversion technique and group B comprised 588 patients (78%) treated with the standard technique. The primary endpoints of the study were postoperative mortality, surgery-related morbidity, the number of sampled lymph nodes in the mesorectum, and late disease-related survival. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality was 1.2% in group A and 1.7% in group B (p = 0.66). Postoperative morbidity was 12% in group A and 11% in group B (p = 0.75). The mean number of sampled lymph nodes in the mesorectum was 23 (range 17–27) in group A and 24 (range 19–29) in group B (p = 0.06). The 5-year disease-related survival was 73% in group A and 74% in group B (p = 0.75). CONCLUSION: The standard and eversion-modified double-staple techniques yield comparable results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8055572 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80555722021-05-05 Standard versus eversion-modified double-staple technique for low colorectal anastomoses after resection of rectal cancer Illuminati, Giulio Pasqua, Rocco Perotti, Bruno Urciuoli, Paolo Nardi, Priscilla Fratini, Chiara Carboni, Fabio Valle, Mario Surg Today Original Article PURPOSE: The double-staple technique, performed as either the standard procedure or after eversion of the rectal stump, is a well-established method of performing low colorectal anastomoses following the resection of rectal cancer. Eversion of the tumor-bearing ano-rectal stump was proposed to allow the linear stapler to be fired at a safe distance of clearance from the tumor. We conducted this study to compare the results of the standard versus the eversion-modified double-staple technique. METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective study were 753 consecutive patients who underwent low stapled colorectal anastomosis after resection of rectal cancer. The patients were divided into two groups according to the method of anastomosis used: Group A comprised 165 patients (22%) treated with the modified eversion technique and group B comprised 588 patients (78%) treated with the standard technique. The primary endpoints of the study were postoperative mortality, surgery-related morbidity, the number of sampled lymph nodes in the mesorectum, and late disease-related survival. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality was 1.2% in group A and 1.7% in group B (p = 0.66). Postoperative morbidity was 12% in group A and 11% in group B (p = 0.75). The mean number of sampled lymph nodes in the mesorectum was 23 (range 17–27) in group A and 24 (range 19–29) in group B (p = 0.06). The 5-year disease-related survival was 73% in group A and 74% in group B (p = 0.75). CONCLUSION: The standard and eversion-modified double-staple techniques yield comparable results. Springer Singapore 2020-10-31 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8055572/ /pubmed/33128593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02174-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Illuminati, Giulio Pasqua, Rocco Perotti, Bruno Urciuoli, Paolo Nardi, Priscilla Fratini, Chiara Carboni, Fabio Valle, Mario Standard versus eversion-modified double-staple technique for low colorectal anastomoses after resection of rectal cancer |
title | Standard versus eversion-modified double-staple technique for low colorectal anastomoses after resection of rectal cancer |
title_full | Standard versus eversion-modified double-staple technique for low colorectal anastomoses after resection of rectal cancer |
title_fullStr | Standard versus eversion-modified double-staple technique for low colorectal anastomoses after resection of rectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Standard versus eversion-modified double-staple technique for low colorectal anastomoses after resection of rectal cancer |
title_short | Standard versus eversion-modified double-staple technique for low colorectal anastomoses after resection of rectal cancer |
title_sort | standard versus eversion-modified double-staple technique for low colorectal anastomoses after resection of rectal cancer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33128593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02174-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT illuminatigiulio standardversuseversionmodifieddoublestapletechniqueforlowcolorectalanastomosesafterresectionofrectalcancer AT pasquarocco standardversuseversionmodifieddoublestapletechniqueforlowcolorectalanastomosesafterresectionofrectalcancer AT perottibruno standardversuseversionmodifieddoublestapletechniqueforlowcolorectalanastomosesafterresectionofrectalcancer AT urciuolipaolo standardversuseversionmodifieddoublestapletechniqueforlowcolorectalanastomosesafterresectionofrectalcancer AT nardipriscilla standardversuseversionmodifieddoublestapletechniqueforlowcolorectalanastomosesafterresectionofrectalcancer AT fratinichiara standardversuseversionmodifieddoublestapletechniqueforlowcolorectalanastomosesafterresectionofrectalcancer AT carbonifabio standardversuseversionmodifieddoublestapletechniqueforlowcolorectalanastomosesafterresectionofrectalcancer AT vallemario standardversuseversionmodifieddoublestapletechniqueforlowcolorectalanastomosesafterresectionofrectalcancer |