Cargando…

Standard versus eversion-modified double-staple technique for low colorectal anastomoses after resection of rectal cancer

PURPOSE: The double-staple technique, performed as either the standard procedure or after eversion of the rectal stump, is a well-established method of performing low colorectal anastomoses following the resection of rectal cancer. Eversion of the tumor-bearing ano-rectal stump was proposed to allow...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Illuminati, Giulio, Pasqua, Rocco, Perotti, Bruno, Urciuoli, Paolo, Nardi, Priscilla, Fratini, Chiara, Carboni, Fabio, Valle, Mario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33128593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02174-5
_version_ 1783680477671981056
author Illuminati, Giulio
Pasqua, Rocco
Perotti, Bruno
Urciuoli, Paolo
Nardi, Priscilla
Fratini, Chiara
Carboni, Fabio
Valle, Mario
author_facet Illuminati, Giulio
Pasqua, Rocco
Perotti, Bruno
Urciuoli, Paolo
Nardi, Priscilla
Fratini, Chiara
Carboni, Fabio
Valle, Mario
author_sort Illuminati, Giulio
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The double-staple technique, performed as either the standard procedure or after eversion of the rectal stump, is a well-established method of performing low colorectal anastomoses following the resection of rectal cancer. Eversion of the tumor-bearing ano-rectal stump was proposed to allow the linear stapler to be fired at a safe distance of clearance from the tumor. We conducted this study to compare the results of the standard versus the eversion-modified double-staple technique. METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective study were 753 consecutive patients who underwent low stapled colorectal anastomosis after resection of rectal cancer. The patients were divided into two groups according to the method of anastomosis used: Group A comprised 165 patients (22%) treated with the modified eversion technique and group B comprised 588 patients (78%) treated with the standard technique. The primary endpoints of the study were postoperative mortality, surgery-related morbidity, the number of sampled lymph nodes in the mesorectum, and late disease-related survival. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality was 1.2% in group A and 1.7% in group B (p = 0.66). Postoperative morbidity was 12% in group A and 11% in group B (p = 0.75). The mean number of sampled lymph nodes in the mesorectum was 23 (range 17–27) in group A and 24 (range 19–29) in group B (p = 0.06). The 5-year disease-related survival was 73% in group A and 74% in group B (p = 0.75). CONCLUSION: The standard and eversion-modified double-staple techniques yield comparable results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8055572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80555722021-05-05 Standard versus eversion-modified double-staple technique for low colorectal anastomoses after resection of rectal cancer Illuminati, Giulio Pasqua, Rocco Perotti, Bruno Urciuoli, Paolo Nardi, Priscilla Fratini, Chiara Carboni, Fabio Valle, Mario Surg Today Original Article PURPOSE: The double-staple technique, performed as either the standard procedure or after eversion of the rectal stump, is a well-established method of performing low colorectal anastomoses following the resection of rectal cancer. Eversion of the tumor-bearing ano-rectal stump was proposed to allow the linear stapler to be fired at a safe distance of clearance from the tumor. We conducted this study to compare the results of the standard versus the eversion-modified double-staple technique. METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective study were 753 consecutive patients who underwent low stapled colorectal anastomosis after resection of rectal cancer. The patients were divided into two groups according to the method of anastomosis used: Group A comprised 165 patients (22%) treated with the modified eversion technique and group B comprised 588 patients (78%) treated with the standard technique. The primary endpoints of the study were postoperative mortality, surgery-related morbidity, the number of sampled lymph nodes in the mesorectum, and late disease-related survival. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality was 1.2% in group A and 1.7% in group B (p = 0.66). Postoperative morbidity was 12% in group A and 11% in group B (p = 0.75). The mean number of sampled lymph nodes in the mesorectum was 23 (range 17–27) in group A and 24 (range 19–29) in group B (p = 0.06). The 5-year disease-related survival was 73% in group A and 74% in group B (p = 0.75). CONCLUSION: The standard and eversion-modified double-staple techniques yield comparable results. Springer Singapore 2020-10-31 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8055572/ /pubmed/33128593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02174-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Illuminati, Giulio
Pasqua, Rocco
Perotti, Bruno
Urciuoli, Paolo
Nardi, Priscilla
Fratini, Chiara
Carboni, Fabio
Valle, Mario
Standard versus eversion-modified double-staple technique for low colorectal anastomoses after resection of rectal cancer
title Standard versus eversion-modified double-staple technique for low colorectal anastomoses after resection of rectal cancer
title_full Standard versus eversion-modified double-staple technique for low colorectal anastomoses after resection of rectal cancer
title_fullStr Standard versus eversion-modified double-staple technique for low colorectal anastomoses after resection of rectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Standard versus eversion-modified double-staple technique for low colorectal anastomoses after resection of rectal cancer
title_short Standard versus eversion-modified double-staple technique for low colorectal anastomoses after resection of rectal cancer
title_sort standard versus eversion-modified double-staple technique for low colorectal anastomoses after resection of rectal cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33128593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02174-5
work_keys_str_mv AT illuminatigiulio standardversuseversionmodifieddoublestapletechniqueforlowcolorectalanastomosesafterresectionofrectalcancer
AT pasquarocco standardversuseversionmodifieddoublestapletechniqueforlowcolorectalanastomosesafterresectionofrectalcancer
AT perottibruno standardversuseversionmodifieddoublestapletechniqueforlowcolorectalanastomosesafterresectionofrectalcancer
AT urciuolipaolo standardversuseversionmodifieddoublestapletechniqueforlowcolorectalanastomosesafterresectionofrectalcancer
AT nardipriscilla standardversuseversionmodifieddoublestapletechniqueforlowcolorectalanastomosesafterresectionofrectalcancer
AT fratinichiara standardversuseversionmodifieddoublestapletechniqueforlowcolorectalanastomosesafterresectionofrectalcancer
AT carbonifabio standardversuseversionmodifieddoublestapletechniqueforlowcolorectalanastomosesafterresectionofrectalcancer
AT vallemario standardversuseversionmodifieddoublestapletechniqueforlowcolorectalanastomosesafterresectionofrectalcancer