Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous rtPA in Ischemic Strokes Due to Small-Vessel Occlusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (iv-rtPA) has been routinely used to treat ischemic stroke for 25 years, following large clinical trials. However, there are few prospective studies on the efficacy and safety of this therapy in strokes attributed to cerebral small vessel disease...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karaszewski, Bartosz, Wyszomirski, Adam, Jabłoński, Bartosz, Werring, David J., Tomaka, Dominika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33641037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12975-021-00890-9
_version_ 1783680478151180288
author Karaszewski, Bartosz
Wyszomirski, Adam
Jabłoński, Bartosz
Werring, David J.
Tomaka, Dominika
author_facet Karaszewski, Bartosz
Wyszomirski, Adam
Jabłoński, Bartosz
Werring, David J.
Tomaka, Dominika
author_sort Karaszewski, Bartosz
collection PubMed
description Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (iv-rtPA) has been routinely used to treat ischemic stroke for 25 years, following large clinical trials. However, there are few prospective studies on the efficacy and safety of this therapy in strokes attributed to cerebral small vessel disease (SVD). We evaluated functional outcome (modified Rankin scale, mRS) and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) using all available data on the effects of iv-rtPA in SVD-related ischemic stroke (defined either using neuroimaging, clinical features, or both). Using fixed-effect and random-effects models, we calculated the pooled effect estimates with regard to excellent and favorable outcomes (mRS=0–1 and 0–2 respectively, at 3 months), and the rate of sICH. Twenty-three studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria, 11 of which were comparative, and there were only 3 randomized clinical trials. In adjusted analyses, there was an increased odds of excellent outcome (adjusted OR=1.53, 95% CI: 1.29–1.82, I2: 0%) or favorable outcome (adjusted OR=1.68, 95% CI: 1.31–2.15,I2: 0%) in patients who received iv-rtPA compared with placebo. Across the six studies which reported it, the incidence of sICH was higher in the treatment group (M-H RR = 8.83, 95% CI: 2.76–28.27). The pooled rate of sICH in patients with SVD administered iv-rtPA was only 0.72% (95% CI: 0.12%–1.64%). We conclude that when ischemic stroke attributed to SVD is considered separately, available data on the effects of iv-rtPA therapy are insufficient for the highest level of recommendation, but it seems to be safe. Although further therapeutic trials in SVD-related ischemic stroke appear to be justified, our findings should not prevent its continued use for this group of patients in clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12975-021-00890-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8055574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80555742021-05-05 Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous rtPA in Ischemic Strokes Due to Small-Vessel Occlusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Karaszewski, Bartosz Wyszomirski, Adam Jabłoński, Bartosz Werring, David J. Tomaka, Dominika Transl Stroke Res Original Article Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (iv-rtPA) has been routinely used to treat ischemic stroke for 25 years, following large clinical trials. However, there are few prospective studies on the efficacy and safety of this therapy in strokes attributed to cerebral small vessel disease (SVD). We evaluated functional outcome (modified Rankin scale, mRS) and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) using all available data on the effects of iv-rtPA in SVD-related ischemic stroke (defined either using neuroimaging, clinical features, or both). Using fixed-effect and random-effects models, we calculated the pooled effect estimates with regard to excellent and favorable outcomes (mRS=0–1 and 0–2 respectively, at 3 months), and the rate of sICH. Twenty-three studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria, 11 of which were comparative, and there were only 3 randomized clinical trials. In adjusted analyses, there was an increased odds of excellent outcome (adjusted OR=1.53, 95% CI: 1.29–1.82, I2: 0%) or favorable outcome (adjusted OR=1.68, 95% CI: 1.31–2.15,I2: 0%) in patients who received iv-rtPA compared with placebo. Across the six studies which reported it, the incidence of sICH was higher in the treatment group (M-H RR = 8.83, 95% CI: 2.76–28.27). The pooled rate of sICH in patients with SVD administered iv-rtPA was only 0.72% (95% CI: 0.12%–1.64%). We conclude that when ischemic stroke attributed to SVD is considered separately, available data on the effects of iv-rtPA therapy are insufficient for the highest level of recommendation, but it seems to be safe. Although further therapeutic trials in SVD-related ischemic stroke appear to be justified, our findings should not prevent its continued use for this group of patients in clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12975-021-00890-9. Springer US 2021-02-28 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8055574/ /pubmed/33641037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12975-021-00890-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Karaszewski, Bartosz
Wyszomirski, Adam
Jabłoński, Bartosz
Werring, David J.
Tomaka, Dominika
Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous rtPA in Ischemic Strokes Due to Small-Vessel Occlusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous rtPA in Ischemic Strokes Due to Small-Vessel Occlusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous rtPA in Ischemic Strokes Due to Small-Vessel Occlusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous rtPA in Ischemic Strokes Due to Small-Vessel Occlusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous rtPA in Ischemic Strokes Due to Small-Vessel Occlusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous rtPA in Ischemic Strokes Due to Small-Vessel Occlusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of intravenous rtpa in ischemic strokes due to small-vessel occlusion: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33641037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12975-021-00890-9
work_keys_str_mv AT karaszewskibartosz efficacyandsafetyofintravenousrtpainischemicstrokesduetosmallvesselocclusionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wyszomirskiadam efficacyandsafetyofintravenousrtpainischemicstrokesduetosmallvesselocclusionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jabłonskibartosz efficacyandsafetyofintravenousrtpainischemicstrokesduetosmallvesselocclusionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT werringdavidj efficacyandsafetyofintravenousrtpainischemicstrokesduetosmallvesselocclusionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tomakadominika efficacyandsafetyofintravenousrtpainischemicstrokesduetosmallvesselocclusionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis