Cargando…

Plague transforms positive effects of precipitation on prairie dogs to negative effects

Rodents characteristically benefit from increased precipitation, especially in typically dry habitats; “good years” of high precipitation improve their forage and water balance. However, Yersinia pestis (plague), a flea-borne pathogen of mammals that was introduced to western North America, has the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biggins, Dean E., Eads, David A., Godbey, Jerry L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8056143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2021.02.006
_version_ 1783680592231006208
author Biggins, Dean E.
Eads, David A.
Godbey, Jerry L.
author_facet Biggins, Dean E.
Eads, David A.
Godbey, Jerry L.
author_sort Biggins, Dean E.
collection PubMed
description Rodents characteristically benefit from increased precipitation, especially in typically dry habitats; “good years” of high precipitation improve their forage and water balance. However, Yersinia pestis (plague), a flea-borne pathogen of mammals that was introduced to western North America, has the greatest negative impact on at least some species of rodents during years of above-average precipitation. In the absence of plague mitigation, negative effects of plague in wet years might overwhelm the otherwise beneficial effects of increased moisture. In Montana and Utah, USA, where plague now occurs enzootically, we investigated the influence of precipitation on finite rates of annual population change (2000–2005) for 3 species of prairie dogs (Cynomys spp.) in replicated plots treated with deltamethrin dust and in non-treated plots for paired comparisons. There was a significant interaction between precipitation and treatment. When we reduced plague vector fleas, prairie dog visual counts tended to increase with increasing precipitation. Simultaneously, there was a negative relationship between counts and precipitation on paired plots where plague was not managed, suggesting that plague transformed and reversed the otherwise beneficial effect of increased precipitation. Are the good years gone for prairie dogs? Even if the good years are not gone, they are perhaps relatively scarce compared to historic times prior to the invasion of plague. This scenario might apply to other ecosystems and may pose broad conservation challenges in western North America.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8056143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80561432021-04-23 Plague transforms positive effects of precipitation on prairie dogs to negative effects Biggins, Dean E. Eads, David A. Godbey, Jerry L. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl Regular Article Rodents characteristically benefit from increased precipitation, especially in typically dry habitats; “good years” of high precipitation improve their forage and water balance. However, Yersinia pestis (plague), a flea-borne pathogen of mammals that was introduced to western North America, has the greatest negative impact on at least some species of rodents during years of above-average precipitation. In the absence of plague mitigation, negative effects of plague in wet years might overwhelm the otherwise beneficial effects of increased moisture. In Montana and Utah, USA, where plague now occurs enzootically, we investigated the influence of precipitation on finite rates of annual population change (2000–2005) for 3 species of prairie dogs (Cynomys spp.) in replicated plots treated with deltamethrin dust and in non-treated plots for paired comparisons. There was a significant interaction between precipitation and treatment. When we reduced plague vector fleas, prairie dog visual counts tended to increase with increasing precipitation. Simultaneously, there was a negative relationship between counts and precipitation on paired plots where plague was not managed, suggesting that plague transformed and reversed the otherwise beneficial effect of increased precipitation. Are the good years gone for prairie dogs? Even if the good years are not gone, they are perhaps relatively scarce compared to historic times prior to the invasion of plague. This scenario might apply to other ecosystems and may pose broad conservation challenges in western North America. Elsevier 2021-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8056143/ /pubmed/33898234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2021.02.006 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Australian Society for Parasitology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Biggins, Dean E.
Eads, David A.
Godbey, Jerry L.
Plague transforms positive effects of precipitation on prairie dogs to negative effects
title Plague transforms positive effects of precipitation on prairie dogs to negative effects
title_full Plague transforms positive effects of precipitation on prairie dogs to negative effects
title_fullStr Plague transforms positive effects of precipitation on prairie dogs to negative effects
title_full_unstemmed Plague transforms positive effects of precipitation on prairie dogs to negative effects
title_short Plague transforms positive effects of precipitation on prairie dogs to negative effects
title_sort plague transforms positive effects of precipitation on prairie dogs to negative effects
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8056143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2021.02.006
work_keys_str_mv AT bigginsdeane plaguetransformspositiveeffectsofprecipitationonprairiedogstonegativeeffects
AT eadsdavida plaguetransformspositiveeffectsofprecipitationonprairiedogstonegativeeffects
AT godbeyjerryl plaguetransformspositiveeffectsofprecipitationonprairiedogstonegativeeffects