Cargando…

The reliability of radiation dose display of a computed tomography scanner

BACKGROUND: Internationally, the typical allowed difference between the measured radiation dose and dose reported by a computed tomography (CT) scanner is ±20 %. The objective is to describe a method in order to analyse this difference in a CT scanner in the Emergency Department of Kanta-Häme Centra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forss, V., Yli-Ollila, H., Vatanen, J., Kölhi, P., Poutanen, V.-P., Palomäki, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8056233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100345
_version_ 1783680610582134784
author Forss, V.
Yli-Ollila, H.
Vatanen, J.
Kölhi, P.
Poutanen, V.-P.
Palomäki, A.
author_facet Forss, V.
Yli-Ollila, H.
Vatanen, J.
Kölhi, P.
Poutanen, V.-P.
Palomäki, A.
author_sort Forss, V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Internationally, the typical allowed difference between the measured radiation dose and dose reported by a computed tomography (CT) scanner is ±20 %. The objective is to describe a method in order to analyse this difference in a CT scanner in the Emergency Department of Kanta-Häme Central Hospital, and to calculate a correction factor for more comparable radiation dose values in further studies. METHODS: Ten intra-day radiation dose measurements were performed with undisturbed setting. Measurement reports on differences between measured and displayed dose were gathered from the vendor maintenance and supervising authority over a 12-year period. Additionally, two in-house measurements were made. A total of 18 datapoints were collected, with some differences in measurement settings. Data were also analysed against imaging parameters, ambient air pressure and time to identify trends or associations in the variation of the discrepancy. RESULTS: Measured doses were generally lower than displayed doses. Differences between displayed and measured doses varied between −3.46 and −0.10 %, with a mean of −1.26 % in the intra-day measurements, and between +4.65 and −17.3 %, with a mean of −7.53 % in the long-term data. There were no trends nor connections in the variations. CONCLUSION: Since the acceptable difference between the radiation dose display and the measured dose is relevant, the average difference for every CT scanner should be determined before radiation dose studies, especially when comparing multiple scanners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8056233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80562332021-04-23 The reliability of radiation dose display of a computed tomography scanner Forss, V. Yli-Ollila, H. Vatanen, J. Kölhi, P. Poutanen, V.-P. Palomäki, A. Eur J Radiol Open Article BACKGROUND: Internationally, the typical allowed difference between the measured radiation dose and dose reported by a computed tomography (CT) scanner is ±20 %. The objective is to describe a method in order to analyse this difference in a CT scanner in the Emergency Department of Kanta-Häme Central Hospital, and to calculate a correction factor for more comparable radiation dose values in further studies. METHODS: Ten intra-day radiation dose measurements were performed with undisturbed setting. Measurement reports on differences between measured and displayed dose were gathered from the vendor maintenance and supervising authority over a 12-year period. Additionally, two in-house measurements were made. A total of 18 datapoints were collected, with some differences in measurement settings. Data were also analysed against imaging parameters, ambient air pressure and time to identify trends or associations in the variation of the discrepancy. RESULTS: Measured doses were generally lower than displayed doses. Differences between displayed and measured doses varied between −3.46 and −0.10 %, with a mean of −1.26 % in the intra-day measurements, and between +4.65 and −17.3 %, with a mean of −7.53 % in the long-term data. There were no trends nor connections in the variations. CONCLUSION: Since the acceptable difference between the radiation dose display and the measured dose is relevant, the average difference for every CT scanner should be determined before radiation dose studies, especially when comparing multiple scanners. Elsevier 2021-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8056233/ /pubmed/33898654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100345 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Forss, V.
Yli-Ollila, H.
Vatanen, J.
Kölhi, P.
Poutanen, V.-P.
Palomäki, A.
The reliability of radiation dose display of a computed tomography scanner
title The reliability of radiation dose display of a computed tomography scanner
title_full The reliability of radiation dose display of a computed tomography scanner
title_fullStr The reliability of radiation dose display of a computed tomography scanner
title_full_unstemmed The reliability of radiation dose display of a computed tomography scanner
title_short The reliability of radiation dose display of a computed tomography scanner
title_sort reliability of radiation dose display of a computed tomography scanner
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8056233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100345
work_keys_str_mv AT forssv thereliabilityofradiationdosedisplayofacomputedtomographyscanner
AT yliollilah thereliabilityofradiationdosedisplayofacomputedtomographyscanner
AT vatanenj thereliabilityofradiationdosedisplayofacomputedtomographyscanner
AT kolhip thereliabilityofradiationdosedisplayofacomputedtomographyscanner
AT poutanenvp thereliabilityofradiationdosedisplayofacomputedtomographyscanner
AT palomakia thereliabilityofradiationdosedisplayofacomputedtomographyscanner
AT forssv reliabilityofradiationdosedisplayofacomputedtomographyscanner
AT yliollilah reliabilityofradiationdosedisplayofacomputedtomographyscanner
AT vatanenj reliabilityofradiationdosedisplayofacomputedtomographyscanner
AT kolhip reliabilityofradiationdosedisplayofacomputedtomographyscanner
AT poutanenvp reliabilityofradiationdosedisplayofacomputedtomographyscanner
AT palomakia reliabilityofradiationdosedisplayofacomputedtomographyscanner